It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 6:31 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 351 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
stoneroses86 wrote:
Unless I am incorrectly reading the MLB Standings Grid, I think the American League Central was 73 - 101 against the American League West.

I believe that only the White Sox had a winning record against West teams. They were 20 - 12.



You could be right. I didn't look it up. I just assumed that they couldn't overcome the giant swing the Sox gave them. That's a good reason to believe the West is better.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:41 am
Posts: 817
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
Unless I am incorrectly reading the MLB Standings Grid, I think the American League Central was 73 - 101 against the American League West.

I believe that only the White Sox had a winning record against West teams. They were 20 - 12.



You could be right. I didn't look it up. I just assumed that they couldn't overcome the giant swing the Sox gave them. That's a good reason to believe the West is better.


I've noticed you prefer to debate off of your gut feeling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Makaveli wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
Unless I am incorrectly reading the MLB Standings Grid, I think the American League Central was 73 - 101 against the American League West.

I believe that only the White Sox had a winning record against West teams. They were 20 - 12.



You could be right. I didn't look it up. I just assumed that they couldn't overcome the giant swing the Sox gave them. That's a good reason to believe the West is better.


I've noticed you prefer to debate off of your gut feeling.



Not really. I wasn't debating. I made a bad assumption. I'm not arguing about it.

We all have access to Google.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
This all just seems so simple to me. If you win the triple crown and your team is in contention for the playoffs you are the MVP.

I get Trout is great and has wonderful numbers and all that, but just not enough this year.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
RFDC wrote:
This all just seems so simple to me. If you win the triple crown and your team is in contention for the playoffs you are the MVP.

I get Trout is great and has wonderful numbers and all that, but just not enough this year.


You are an ignorant slut

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
If you were a Tigers fan and you could swap Cabrera out for Trout right now before the playoffs begin, would you do it?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
Northside_Dan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
This all just seems so simple to me. If you win the triple crown and your team is in contention for the playoffs you are the MVP.

I get Trout is great and has wonderful numbers and all that, but just not enough this year.


You are an ignorant slut


True, but what does that have to do with this?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you were a Tigers fan and you could swap Cabrera out for Trout right now before the playoffs begin, would you do it?


For just this playoffs? No.

If for the remainder of their careers, then obviously yes.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:48 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
RFDC wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you were a Tigers fan and you could swap Cabrera out for Trout right now before the playoffs begin, would you do it?


For just this playoffs? No.

If for the remainder of their careers, then obviously yes.



And don't even think it's obvious then. Maybe less so. Cabrera is a great player, a likely Hall of Famer. Trout is a guy who has had one year. But yeah, I was talking about right now, this season. If a guy is more valuable, shouldn't be a no-brainer that you would take him? I can't see how you could possibly take Trout over Cabrera.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
Makaveli wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
Unless I am incorrectly reading the MLB Standings Grid, I think the American League Central was 73 - 101 against the American League West.

I believe that only the White Sox had a winning record against West teams. They were 20 - 12.


So you agree that the 2012 version of Mickey Mantle should be MVP?

I disagree with your premise, but agree with your conclusion.

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I just like that this debate has gotten Boers to disagree with Bernsie. Boers usually wins in these rare times.

Cabrera will and should win MVP.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:51 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
I just like that this debate has gotten Boers to disagree with Bernsie. Boers usually wins in these rare times.

Cabrera will and should win MVP.



I'm not listening, but I assume bernstein is beating him over the head with WAR.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
For you Cabrera backers, if he was a DH, would you still vote for him to get the MVP?


Bottom line for me is, Trout is an all around better player. Maybe not in 3 categories, but in all of them that matter to winning a baseball game, he had a better year. Really hard to dispute that. Hell, even Trout's offensive WAR is higher than Miggy's.


I would rather have Trout right now, if I were the Tigers. His defense, his baserunning, steals, etc make him more valuable all around.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
For you Cabrera backers, if he was a DH, would you still vote for him to get the MVP?



Probably more so. He'd be even more valuable without his shitty defense.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
For you Cabrera backers, if he was a DH, would you still vote for him to get the MVP?



Probably more so. He'd be even more valuable without his shitty defense.


So you discredit for bad defense, but don't credit for good defense?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I just like that this debate has gotten Boers to disagree with Bernsie. Boers usually wins in these rare times.

Cabrera will and should win MVP.



I'm not listening, but I assume bernstein is beating him over the head with WAR.

I was half listening. I think it came up but it wasnt the crux of the debate. The only part I heard clearly was Bernsie saying RBIs don't matter when talking about an individual players value, and Boers using his own logic against him to say that runs scored doesn't really matter then. Bernsie half agreed and they moved on.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
For you Cabrera backers, if he was a DH, would you still vote for him to get the MVP?



Probably more so. He'd be even more valuable without his shitty defense.


So you discredit for bad defense, but don't credit for good defense?


I think defense on the outfield corners is rather inconsequential. If he's in center everyday, it means a little more. I was really just making a joke though. Cabrera is a superior hitter.

If you're going to have DH as a position, I don't think it's fair to deduct points because that's the position a guy plays. His 4.5 at-bats a game or whatever the number is carry far more weight than the 3 balls that come to a guy at third, most of which everyone handles anyway.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
OK. Somebody should never get "plus points" for being the DH. Yes Cabrerea is a butcher, but at least he's "good" enough to be out there. Not his fault the manager put him in the field. DH's should automatically get the worst possible defensive grade, like -25 runs.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79584
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I just like that this debate has gotten Boers to disagree with Bernsie. Boers usually wins in these rare times.

Cabrera will and should win MVP.



I'm not listening, but I assume bernstein is beating him over the head with WAR.

I was half listening. I think it came up but it wasnt the crux of the debate. The only part I heard clearly was Bernsie saying RBIs don't matter when talking about an individual players value, and Boers using his own logic against him to say that runs scored doesn't really matter then. Bernsie half agreed and they moved on.



In fact, runs scored and runs driven in matter more than anything else. It's a conversation like that that shows just how advanced stats have caused some morons to lose sight of the actual game.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think defense on the outfield corners is rather inconsequential. If he's in center everyday, it means a little more.


Sabr guys will tell you this is wrong and I agree with them. A guy with a pus arm will get run on all day. A butcher will let balls get past and its off to the races.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I just like that this debate has gotten Boers to disagree with Bernsie. Boers usually wins in these rare times.

Cabrera will and should win MVP.



I'm not listening, but I assume bernstein is beating him over the head with WAR.

I was half listening. I think it came up but it wasnt the crux of the debate. The only part I heard clearly was Bernsie saying RBIs don't matter when talking about an individual players value, and Boers using his own logic against him to say that runs scored doesn't really matter then. Bernsie half agreed and they moved on.



In fact, runs scored and runs driven in matter more than anything else. It's a conversation like that that shows just how advanced stats have caused some morons to lose sight of the actual game.


What Dan has said in the past about runs and RBI is that they're out of the hitter's control. They're dependant on other players.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I just like that this debate has gotten Boers to disagree with Bernsie. Boers usually wins in these rare times.

Cabrera will and should win MVP.



I'm not listening, but I assume bernstein is beating him over the head with WAR.

I was half listening. I think it came up but it wasnt the crux of the debate. The only part I heard clearly was Bernsie saying RBIs don't matter when talking about an individual players value, and Boers using his own logic against him to say that runs scored doesn't really matter then. Bernsie half agreed and they moved on.



In fact, runs scored and runs driven in matter more than anything else. It's a conversation like that that shows just how advanced stats have caused some morons to lose sight of the actual game.

I'm pretty sure that's what Boers was getting at, or trying to at least. He brought up how it really is inconsequential how many people got in scoring position in front of Cabrera. Cabrera got them in. How many times in September did White Sox fans want a "lucky" guy like Cabrera to drive in runs with RISP?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Boy I don't know what is more riveting around here today....Triple Crown vs WAR in this thread or the Mitt vs Obama thread. I miss the shitty Cubs already. When does basketball start.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Last edited by Phil McCracken on Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I just like that this debate has gotten Boers to disagree with Bernsie. Boers usually wins in these rare times.

Cabrera will and should win MVP.



I'm not listening, but I assume bernstein is beating him over the head with WAR.

I was half listening. I think it came up but it wasnt the crux of the debate. The only part I heard clearly was Bernsie saying RBIs don't matter when talking about an individual players value, and Boers using his own logic against him to say that runs scored doesn't really matter then. Bernsie half agreed and they moved on.



In fact, runs scored and runs driven in matter more than anything else. It's a conversation like that that shows just how advanced stats have caused some morons to lose sight of the actual game.


You just don't get it, and you obviously don't care to because you are too smart for this. It's not that they do or don't matter. It's how they matter in the conversation about a single, particular player's value.

Runs, like RBI, are dependent on teammates. IE, it's not as indicative of a single player's value, as stats that are more directly correlated with that specific player. Like HRs, SBs, fielding, AVG, slugging, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
stoneroses86 wrote:
Unless I am incorrectly reading the MLB Standings Grid, I think the American League Central was 73 - 101 against the American League West.

I believe that only the White Sox had a winning record against West teams. They were 20 - 12.


There you go using facts again. Didn't you read JORR's "pretty sure" response? That trumps all the "facts" of which you speak.

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Maybe not in 3 categories, but in all of them that matter to winning a baseball game, he had a better year.


What? You're discounting those three categories how? Average, HR, and RBI don't matter when it comes to winning a ball game?

Fucking Apple fanboys...can't be objective about anything.


What? I said Miguel was better in 3 categories. Trout was better when you consider all categories. How hard is that to understand?


Shut up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Maybe not in 3 categories, but in all of them that matter to winning a baseball game, he had a better year.


What? You're discounting those three categories how? Average, HR, and RBI don't matter when it comes to winning a ball game?

Fucking Apple fanboys...can't be objective about anything.

Is the Wisconsin football program the greatest football program in the history of the NCAA? Is Lee Evans the best WR ever?


WTF are you talking about? Did you bump your head?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Bucky Chris wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Maybe not in 3 categories, but in all of them that matter to winning a baseball game, he had a better year.


What? You're discounting those three categories how? Average, HR, and RBI don't matter when it comes to winning a ball game?

Fucking Apple fanboys...can't be objective about anything.

Is the Wisconsin football program the greatest football program in the history of the NCAA? Is Lee Evans the best WR ever?


WTF are you talking about? Did you bump your head?



:lol:


Boat ..........................................................................IMU

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Maybe not in 3 categories, but in all of them that matter to winning a baseball game, he had a better year.

This quote cannot be misread in its meaning.

You say Miggy was better in three categories...but those categories don't come into player when attempting to win a baseball game.

What happens to a team that has its hitters bat .150 with no homers and 1 RBI.

They don't win.


WHAT!?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
immessedup17 wrote:
Miguel Cabrera was more valuable, because he had more impact on his team than Mike Trout had for the Angels. He was the guy on a playoff team. Mike Trout was the guy on a team that missed the playoffs.



The playoff thing is a really terrible argument to make for Cabrera.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 351 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group