Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Hitting?
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=114441
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Nas [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Hitting?

There were 11k fewer balls put in play this year than there were a decade ago, more strikeouts than hits for the first time ever and the fewest hits in 50 years. This sounds like a MAJOR issue.

Author:  312player [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

More guys gotta lay bunts down against the shift, that's what will stop Defenses from loading up the right side. And choke up when ya get 2 strikes..wtf

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Small, fast players are a thing of the past. Tall, muscular dudes are how shit rolls now. Grip it and rip it.

Author:  Hussra [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Image

Author:  America [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

The league is lost in space. They are obsessed with shortening the games and the solution is right in front of them.

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

For those who have followed the debate over switching to an electronic strike zone, I have a question: do the errors predominantly favor the hitter (i.e., human umps are calling too many actual strikes as balls) or vice versa?

Author:  Nas [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Hussra wrote:
Image


Boom or bust

Author:  Nas [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Jaw Breaker wrote:
For those who have followed the debate over switching to an electronic strike zone, I have a question: do the errors predominantly favor the hitter (i.e., human umps are calling too many actual strikes as balls) or vice versa?


I think far more balls are being called strikes.

Author:  America [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

It's hard to tell how it would play out.

The issue really is that the meaning of balls and strikes has been lost. The reason the count exists is so pitchers don't throw pitches that are utterly unhittable. I'm not talking about a nasty slider or fastball, I'm talking a ball launched over a batter's head. Balls and strikes are there to keep the fight a fair one for batters.

Now it's becoming such a mundane but overwhelmingly important battleground where an easily hittable pitch delivered 1cm to the outside of what is really an arbitrary and imaginary box is declared unhittable and the pitcher in penalized for it. It won't be hard to get batters to start swinging again if you change the terms of the pitches they are expected to swing at.

A good eye is a skill. I am not saying those who can discern what is a ball or strike are untalented, but it's so boring to watch and so slow...it just doesn't belong in the game.

Author:  America [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

It's wild how 5 years ago I would have told you baseball was humming along nicely while the NFL was in existential crisis. Now the script feels flipped.

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Nas wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
For those who have followed the debate over switching to an electronic strike zone, I have a question: do the errors predominantly favor the hitter (i.e., human umps are calling too many actual strikes as balls) or vice versa?


I think far more balls are being called strikes.


That surprises me as it seems batters are taking borderline pitches at a record clip, even on 0-2 counts. I'd think that wouldn't happen so much if they were consistently getting burned by umps.

Author:  newper [ Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Big Chicagoan wrote:
Small, fast players are a thing of the past.

Team speed? For Christ's sake....

Author:  good dolphin [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

America wrote:
It's hard to tell how it would play out.

The issue really is that the meaning of balls and strikes has been lost. The reason the count exists is so pitchers don't throw pitches that are utterly unhittable. I'm not talking about a nasty slider or fastball, I'm talking a ball launched over a batter's head. Balls and strikes are there to keep the fight a fair one for batters.

Now it's becoming such a mundane but overwhelmingly important battleground where an easily hittable pitch delivered 1cm to the outside of what is really an arbitrary and imaginary box is declared unhittable and the pitcher in penalized for it. It won't be hard to get batters to start swinging again if you change the terms of the pitches they are expected to swing at.

A good eye is a skill. I am not saying those who can discern what is a ball or strike are untalented, but it's so boring to watch and so slow...it just doesn't belong in the game.


Contrearas wildly celebrated a walk the other day

Author:  pittmike [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Make the zone bigger. Make them pay the price for sitting on home run pitches.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

good dolphin wrote:
America wrote:
It's hard to tell how it would play out.

The issue really is that the meaning of balls and strikes has been lost. The reason the count exists is so pitchers don't throw pitches that are utterly unhittable. I'm not talking about a nasty slider or fastball, I'm talking a ball launched over a batter's head. Balls and strikes are there to keep the fight a fair one for batters.

Now it's becoming such a mundane but overwhelmingly important battleground where an easily hittable pitch delivered 1cm to the outside of what is really an arbitrary and imaginary box is declared unhittable and the pitcher in penalized for it. It won't be hard to get batters to start swinging again if you change the terms of the pitches they are expected to swing at.

A good eye is a skill. I am not saying those who can discern what is a ball or strike are untalented, but it's so boring to watch and so slow...it just doesn't belong in the game.


Contrearas wildly celebrated a walk the other day

He actually does that (bat throw) frequently when it's an important to get on base situation.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Which is fine, but then in turn Cubs players (Baez) cannot bitch about opposing teams flipping their bats or celebrating after a win.

Author:  America [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

How do you make the zone larger without totally imbalancing in favor of pitchers though? I dont have a problem with the runs being scored now, just the glacial pace and boring unwatchability of guys coming up to the plate intent on taking a walk.

Author:  Keyser Soze [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Pitchers are really good. Hitting is really hard.

Author:  pittmike [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Keyser Soze wrote:
Pitchers are really good. Hitting is really hard.


Especially when you strategize to not swing the bat.

Author:  Keyser Soze [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

It’s a better strategy than swinging at a pitch they can’t hit.

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

I think part of it is the new wave of hard throwers...they throw 98+ and miss a lot of bats, but that almost always comes with more wildness and more walks.

At some point, the height of the mound and even the 60.5' distance may need to be re-examined. We may be reaching the tipping point where the reaction time of even the best batters won't be fast enough. Ironically, I think that's what helped Baez this year...I got the sense he gave up trying to react to pitches and just decided before the pitch whether he was going to swing or not.

Author:  pittmike [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Keyser Soze wrote:
It’s a better strategy than swinging at a pitch they can’t hit.


You know what I mean with the Cub Way and other teams stressing do not swing at first pitch etc. Get the starters out of the game etc.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Part of this is bullpens that have guys firing 97 coming in to pitch in the 5th and 6th inning.

As time goes on, the 4 complete games by the Sox in the '05 ALCS is becoming more and more of a historic feat. In twenty years, its going to seem impossible that something like that ever happened.

Author:  Nas [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Part of this is bullpens that have guys firing 97 coming in to pitch in the 5th and 6th inning.

As time goes on, the 4 complete games by the Sox in the '05 ALCS is becoming more and more of a historic feat. In twenty years, its going to seem impossible that something like that ever happened.


I agree.

Author:  America [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

A possible way to rebalance expanding the zone is to give teams 3 pitching changes per 9 inning game (with a new pitching change in extra's and every 3 innings after) and making 3 BB's an automatic ejection. Similar to the foul limit.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

America wrote:
A possible way to rebalance expanding the zone is to give teams 3 pitching changes per 9 inning game (with a new pitching change in extra's and every 3 innings after) and making 3 BB's an automatic ejection. Similar to the foul limit.
Or I could sleep in the park! You could knock these walls down, make it an eight room luxury suite.

Author:  America [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

I used to be a "the game is fine the way it is!" person but shit's gotten way out of hand.

Author:  Nas [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

America wrote:
I used to be a "the game is fine the way it is!" person but shit's gotten way out of hand.


It was. The launch angle crap is responsible for this.

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

America wrote:
A possible way to rebalance expanding the zone is to give teams 3 pitching changes per 9 inning game (with a new pitching change in extra's and every 3 innings after) and making 3 BB's an automatic ejection. Similar to the foul limit.


I like your concept about an ejection after x number of BB, though I would think you would need to incorporate that with an electronic zone. The good thing about that idea is it doesn't fundamentally change the rules/stats for historical purposes the same way moving the mound or other ideas would.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitting?

pittmike wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
It’s a better strategy than swinging at a pitch they can’t hit.


You know what I mean with the Cub Way and other teams stressing do not swing at first pitch etc. Get the starters out of the game etc.

That's pretty much gone now with the rise of dominant bullpens.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/