Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Babe Ruth would suck
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=115498
Page 1 of 5

Author:  Nas [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Babe Ruth would suck

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/2550 ... -babe-ruth

Author:  Douchebag [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Old.

Slow.

White.

Bad.

Author:  tommy [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Quote:
In a 22-year career, Ruth batted .342 with 714 homers. He is the all-time leader in slugging percentage at .690 and OPS at 1.164.

And Ruth likely could strike out Ottavino every time. The left-hander started his career as a pitcher with the Boston Red Sox, winning 20 games twice and posting a career 2.28 ERA. He won two games in the 1918 World Series when the Red Sox beat the Chicago Cubs in six games.

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

I saw this earlier. Baseball players tend to be morons so this isn't surprising.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Douchebag wrote:
Old.

Slow.

White.

Bad.
My favorite Godfathers song.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Ottavino is an idiot. Ruth would go 3 for 4 against him and strike his dopey ass out four times.

Author:  Brick [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Douchebag wrote:
Old.

Slow.

White.

Bad.


Yep!

FavreFan wrote:
I saw this earlier. Baseball players tend to be morons so this isn't surprising.


It's not just baseball players. MANY athletes feel the same way.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

FavreFan wrote:
I saw this earlier. Baseball players tend to be morons so this isn't surprising.


:lol: Don't get butthurt because someone is mocking your precious in another thread.

I'll grant you one thing though, the idea that Ottavino would dominate Ruth is far more ridiculous than believing the moon landing never happened.

Author:  tommy [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Old.

Slow.

White.

Bad.
My favorite Godfathers song.

:lol: :lol: :lol: I didn't think you were that old...

Author:  tommy [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Douchebag wrote:
Old.

Slow.

White.

Bad.


I wonder about that....

Author:  Rod [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.



No. Babe Ruth when he was in his 20s (not his late 30s like most of the photos and newsreels that are available) would kick the living shit out of Adam Ottavino just the way he was.

Author:  GoldenJet [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

tommy wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Old.

Slow.

White.

Bad.
My favorite Godfathers song.

:lol: :lol: :lol: I didn't think you were that old...


Great fucking band!

Author:  Nas [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.



No. Babe Ruth when he was in his 20s, (not his late 30s like most of the photos and newsreels that are available) would kick the living shit out of Adam Ottavino just the way he was.


It wouldn't change in his 30's either

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I saw this earlier. Baseball players tend to be morons so this isn't surprising.


:lol: Don't get butthurt because someone is mocking your precious in another thread.


Not even sure what you're referencing but I mean, come on, baseball players are idiots, generally speaking.

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.



No. Babe Ruth when he was in his 20s (not his late 30s like most of the photos and newsreels that are available) would kick the living shit out of Adam Ottavino just the way he was.


Yeah Babe Ruth with today’s training and medicine would hit 80 HRs a season. He wouldn’t be out whoring, eating, smoking and drinking all night and waking up and going to a play a true doubleheader the next day.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

He would still probably be whoring, but I agree with your overall point.


Anyway, forget the hitting. Babe Ruth actually was a better pitcher than Ottavino could even dream to be.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I saw this earlier. Baseball players tend to be morons so this isn't surprising.


:lol: Don't get butthurt because someone is mocking your precious in another thread.


Not even sure what you're referencing but I mean, come on, baseball players are idiots, generally speaking.

C’mon man I’m sure they open mail and drink coffee in the clubhouse just like their genius NBA counterparts

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Frank Coztansa wrote:
He would still probably be whoring, but I agree with your overall point.


Anyway, forget the hitting. Babe Ruth actually was a better pitcher than Ottavino could even dream to be.


Yeah but I’ve read even now in the NBA, you see that road teams have a higher winning percentage due to Tinder/dating sites getting them quick access to strange while on the road vs having to go out and find them at the club. At least that’s the working theory. Hahaha

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Strange is such a goofy term for pussy.

Author:  Brick [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.



No. Babe Ruth when he was in his 20s (not his late 30s like most of the photos and newsreels that are available) would kick the living shit out of Adam Ottavino just the way he was.
That swing is very slow for a MLB player now. He would have to adjust it. I think he would but if we are talking about a time machine putting Babe Ruth into Yankee Stadium and saying "Go hit a home run" then he gets crushed. If he had time to make those adjustments that are now needed to compete I think he would easily.

I view it similarly how people say "Jordan wasn't a great three point shooter!" like he somehow couldn't extend his range. Ruth would have dominated but the exact type of player he was back then would struggle today.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.



No. Babe Ruth when he was in his 20s (not his late 30s like most of the photos and newsreels that are available) would kick the living shit out of Adam Ottavino just the way he was.


Yeah Babe Ruth with today’s training and medicine would hit 80 HRs a season. He wouldn’t be out whoring, eating, smoking and drinking all night and waking up and going to a play a true doubleheader the next day.


He would still be a whore.

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Of course he would only hit .140 with 8 homers...he’d be 120 years old.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.



No. Babe Ruth when he was in his 20s (not his late 30s like most of the photos and newsreels that are available) would kick the living shit out of Adam Ottavino just the way he was.
That swing is very slow for a MLB player now. He would have to adjust it. I think he would but if we are talking about a time machine putting Babe Ruth into Yankee Stadium and saying "Go hit a home run" then he gets crushed. If he had time to make those adjustments that are now needed to compete I think he would easily.

I view it similarly how people say "Jordan wasn't a great three point shooter!" like he somehow couldn't extend his range. Ruth would have dominated but the exact type of player he was back then would struggle today.
I agree . When you allow for inflation, the guys in 1927 only threw 79 mph unlike the 100 mph he wouldn’t get around on today .

Author:  Regular Reader [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

tommy wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Old.

Slow.

White.

Bad.


I wonder about that....


Some have said... :lol:

Author:  Nas [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

He was swinging a maple tree.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

badrogue17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's technically right but it's also technically right that I know far more about science than Issac Newton.

If we let Babe Ruth get up to speed he wouldn't look like that either.



No. Babe Ruth when he was in his 20s (not his late 30s like most of the photos and newsreels that are available) would kick the living shit out of Adam Ottavino just the way he was.
That swing is very slow for a MLB player now. He would have to adjust it. I think he would but if we are talking about a time machine putting Babe Ruth into Yankee Stadium and saying "Go hit a home run" then he gets crushed. If he had time to make those adjustments that are now needed to compete I think he would easily.

I view it similarly how people say "Jordan wasn't a great three point shooter!" like he somehow couldn't extend his range. Ruth would have dominated but the exact type of player he was back then would struggle today.
I agree . When you allow for inflation, the guys in 1927 only threw 79 mph unlike the 100 mph he wouldn’t get around on today .


But it would be a heavy 79.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That swing is very slow for a MLB player now.
:lol: What? How do we know that? The film technology back then was garbage. From the footage I've seen, he looks like Rickey Henderson sprinting around the bases.

Author:  GoldenJet [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Strange is such a goofy term for pussy.


Because it's not a term for pussy...it's short for "strange pussy" as in different from the one you're used to at home.

You did already know that, right?

Author:  Brick [ Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Babe Ruth would suck

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That swing is very slow for a MLB player now.
:lol: What? How do we know that? The film technology back then was garbage. From the footage I've seen, he looks like Rickey Henderson sprinting around the bases.
Are you saying that all film technology was in slow motion back then? If so, then I don't really understand the last sentence.

Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/