I never understood this rule. Yesterday in the Sox game someone on the Indians stole 2nd in the 9th, in a 3 run game. Defensive indifference was called and he wasn't credited with a SB.

I'm not aware of any other sport that does something arbitrary like that with a stat. In basketball if the clock is ticking down in the 4th and one team starts to walk off the floor and someone walks in for an uncontested layup, they still get 2 points. Similarly if someone chucked up a 3 and another guy grabbed the rebound, they still get credited with a rebound.

It was only a 3 run game. I still wouldn't agree with the premise but I could at least understand if it was 14-1 or something. Granted, the run was insignificant, but if they came back and tied or won the game would they retroactively credit them with a steal? Eh, whatever, the whole thing makes no sense to me

The way the White Sox staff holds runners on, you can conclude that 75% of steals against them were subject to this interpretation.

_________________
“Mmmm. Move over, eggs. Bacon just got a new best friend - fudge.”

Same holds true for the Cubs (might even be a little higher).

This rule isn't used very much. If a scorer wanted to be a prick, he could use this every time a base runner wasn't held. Also, no one would ever get credit for a delayed steal.

_________________
You cannot make me care about the WNBA.

Defensive Indifference gets called fairly often when dealing with steals where the catcher doesn't even throw out to second in the late innings. I don't have a problem with it.

The scoring quirk that I do dislike is the dropped third strike business. If you strike out the batter, but he advances to first on a dropped third strike, you shouldn't be credited with a strikeout. StrikeOUT. He's not out. Also, 'reached on error' should be factored into OBP. I think it takes a certain amount of skill to reach on an error sometimes.

_________________