Well one thing you have realize is that the essence of what the Hall of Fame is can only be determined by people who have already been voted into the Hall of Fame, or are voters. I am both, and my perspective on either side of the spectrum comes from the idea that when you have something added in baseball, you have to count what it is as it as, as we talk about "saves".
Now, with John Smoltz, he has a lot of career saves, but what I do is look back on my time with the Machine, and wonder--how many games did I save? I most likely saved over a hundred games as well. You also look at the wins that John Smoltz had. He had over two hundred. I most likely accounted for about the same amount of games, maybe more. So in that regard, yes, he is a Hall of Famer.
But to be on a first ballot, you can't just win and save games to be voted in that easily. You have to have done all the small things, and John Smoltz was never counted on for that. That is unfortunate for him because he was a great pitcher. But he is not a first ballot Hall of Famer.
_________________ Second is better than first when speaking in terms of basemen, and more specifically, me.
|