Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

A player to be named later?
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=22563
Page 1 of 1

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  A player to be named later?

Can someone explain to me how this works? Is the player decided upon, but not named yet? Is it just a future draft pick?

Author:  Colonel Angus [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

Sometimes, the player might be injured or something, and they have to wait until he gets off the IL before he can be traded or announced in a trade. That's one reason it's a player to be named later.

Author:  Keyser Soze [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

They make a list of players they can choose from. Gives them a little more time to do some additional scouting. I believe it's betwen Taylor Green and Lorenzo Cain in the Sabbathia deal.

Author:  SHARK [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break.

Author:  RFDC [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

If the player to be named later has to be on the 40 man roster, then there have been a lot of deals done that have broken that rule. A lot of player to be named later turn out to be minor league guys.

Author:  Colonel Angus [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

SHARK wrote:
670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break.


So the Brewers are upgrading from a J.J. to a C.C.

Author:  Mr. Reason [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

SHARK wrote:
670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break.

Shark, all of your posts seem strangely "odd" to me. Not "odd" in a subjective way, but "odd" in a structural way.
Do you have an explanation for this "oddity"? I don't know if I can sleep until I have an explanation.
Please help me.

Author:  Keyser Soze [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

SHARK wrote:
670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break.


Really? Huh. Why would they have to wait for Hardy to be named? I just read that it's between Taylor Green and Michael Brantley. Hardy has been on the market but I would be shocked if he goes as part of this deal.

Author:  Hawkeye Vince [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: A player to be named later?

Keyser Soze wrote:
SHARK wrote:
670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break.


Really? Huh. Why would they have to wait for Hardy to be named? I just read that it's between Taylor Green and Michael Brantley. Hardy has been on the market but I would be shocked if he goes as part of this deal.


I think PTBNL have to occur within a year of the deal so if it was Hardy, it would happen after the season.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/