Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
A player to be named later? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=22563 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | A player to be named later? |
Can someone explain to me how this works? Is the player decided upon, but not named yet? Is it just a future draft pick? |
Author: | Colonel Angus [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
Sometimes, the player might be injured or something, and they have to wait until he gets off the IL before he can be traded or announced in a trade. That's one reason it's a player to be named later. |
Author: | Keyser Soze [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
They make a list of players they can choose from. Gives them a little more time to do some additional scouting. I believe it's betwen Taylor Green and Lorenzo Cain in the Sabbathia deal. |
Author: | SHARK [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break. |
Author: | RFDC [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
If the player to be named later has to be on the 40 man roster, then there have been a lot of deals done that have broken that rule. A lot of player to be named later turn out to be minor league guys. |
Author: | Colonel Angus [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
SHARK wrote: 670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break. So the Brewers are upgrading from a J.J. to a C.C. |
Author: | Mr. Reason [ Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
SHARK wrote: 670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break. Shark, all of your posts seem strangely "odd" to me. Not "odd" in a subjective way, but "odd" in a structural way. Do you have an explanation for this "oddity"? I don't know if I can sleep until I have an explanation. Please help me. |
Author: | Keyser Soze [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
SHARK wrote: 670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break. Really? Huh. Why would they have to wait for Hardy to be named? I just read that it's between Taylor Green and Michael Brantley. Hardy has been on the market but I would be shocked if he goes as part of this deal. |
Author: | Hawkeye Vince [ Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: A player to be named later? |
Keyser Soze wrote: SHARK wrote: 670 "The SCORE's" Steve Stone mentioned on "Mully & Hanley" this morning that the "player to be named" is the Brewers' J.J. Hardy in the C.C. Sabathia trade. As far as I know, "players to be named" have to be on the 40 man roster, and "Stoney" thinks Hardy is the one headed to Progressive (Formerly Jacobs) Field, probably after the All-Star Break. Really? Huh. Why would they have to wait for Hardy to be named? I just read that it's between Taylor Green and Michael Brantley. Hardy has been on the market but I would be shocked if he goes as part of this deal. I think PTBNL have to occur within a year of the deal so if it was Hardy, it would happen after the season. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |