Well this season just continues to get better.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Derosa traded to Cardinals https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=34180 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | crosscheck [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Derosa traded to Cardinals |
The MLB network is reporting it... |
|
| Author: | Old Man River [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
ESPN has it too |
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
I wonder if the country cocksuckers at Wrigley will give him a standing O' now? |
|
| Author: | Old Man River [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Mr. Reason wrote: I wonder if the country cocksuckers at Wrigley will give him a standing O' now? We'll find out in 2 weeks. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Well this season just continues to get better.
|
|
| Author: | crosscheck [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
The Indians received a player to be named later and reliever chris perez... Doesn't sound like that much to me, I thought the indians would have gotten a lot more for him... |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Mr. Reason wrote: I wonder if the country cocksuckers at Wrigley will give him a standing O' now? Hawk Harrelson wrote: No. That is total B.S.!!!
|
|
| Author: | Old Man River [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
crosscheck wrote: The Indians received a player to be named later and reliever chris perez... Doesn't sound like that much to me, I thought the indians would have gotten a lot more for him... All they wanted was one major league arm. Cubs could've probably sent Wells, Marshall, or Samardzija and that would've been fine. I don't see how the Cubs can make moves with the ownership situation the way it is. |
|
| Author: | Keyser Soze [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
The PTBNL will be very interesting (no way it's Brett Wallace) but Perez has great stuff and is a potential closer. Looks like a good deal for both teams. |
|
| Author: | Mr. Hernandez [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
I don't think there was no way that Hendry woulda brought DeRosa back anyway. |
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Hendry's a boob. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Mr. Hernandez wrote: I don't think there was no way that Hendry woulda brought DeRosa back anyway. I have no idea what this statement is actually saying. |
|
| Author: | Jalapenos and More [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
5th team in 6 years. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Jalapenos and More wrote: 5th team in 6 years. Yeah, he's a total clubhouse cancer. A real bad guy. 
|
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Jalapenos and More wrote: 5th team in 6 years. I thought this thread was about DeRosa, not Mr. KerPlunk? |
|
| Author: | Mr. Hernandez [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
spanky wrote: Mr. Hernandez wrote: I don't think there was no way that Hendry woulda brought DeRosa back anyway. I have no idea what this statement is actually saying. It's saying if Hendry would have made a move to re-acquire DeRosa than he would be admitting that he was wrong for trading him in the 1st place. GM's are too proud and never like to admit they were wrong |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Oh. I don't get it. |
|
| Author: | Elmhurst Steve [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
Old Man River wrote: crosscheck wrote: The Indians received a player to be named later and reliever chris perez... Doesn't sound like that much to me, I thought the indians would have gotten a lot more for him... All they wanted was one major league arm. Cubs could've probably sent Wells, Marshall, or Samardzija and that would've been fine. I don't see how the Cubs can make moves with the ownership situation the way it is. Samardzija has a no trade clause, so he couldn't be dealt. Marshall is the lone lefty in the bullpen and Wells has been outstanding. I guess I might have chose Marshall. The shame of it, is that they ever dealt him. Had they NOT signed Bradley, they could have kept DeRosa and still had money to spend. But with the ownership situation not settled, I don't expect any significant additions now either. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
The Cubs' Ryan Theriot is not at all happy that Mark DeRosa is back in the National League Central wearing the St. Louis Cardinals' uniform...If the Cubs don't win it this year, this could be the one move that'll haunt G.M. Jim Hendry & Lou Piniella to a point where he might want to go back to that broadcast booth upstairs after this season. |
|
| Author: | Jalapenos and More [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Derosa traded to Cardinals |
The Indians still get another player from the deal. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|