| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Matt Cain https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=68807 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | kujoe_7 [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Matt Cain |
Cain Expected To Sign Five-Year Deal By Ben Nicholson-Smith [April 2 at 1:41pm CST] The Giants will sign right-hander Matt Cain to an extension "in the neighborhood of" five years and $110MM by Opening Day, two sources tell John Shea of the San Francisco Chronicle (on Twitter). |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
Better than Lincecum for the long haul. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
rogers park bryan wrote: Better than Lincecum for the long haul. FavreFan vibe. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
spmack wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Better than Lincecum for the long haul. FavreFan vibe. Where did he mention Tin Duncan? |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
spmack wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Better than Lincecum for the long haul. FavreFan vibe. No way, look at the numbers. There not as far off as you'd think. I dont trust Lincecum's slingshot motion either. Over the last two seasons, Cain has matched Lincecum's numbers. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
rogers park bryan wrote: spmack wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Better than Lincecum for the long haul. FavreFan vibe. No way, look at the numbers. There not as far off as you'd think. I dont trust Lincecum's slingshot motion either. Over the last two seasons, Cain has matched Lincecum's numbers. Except the one that counts. He's under .500 for his career supported by the same offense as Lincecum. Maybe he just isn't a winning pitcher. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
Lincecum was 12-13 last year. Cain was 12-11 Also, Cain lasts longer in games and some of those losses went to RP in Lincecum's starts. Im with you, JORR that wins DO have value, but I would hardly call them the only stat that matters. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
rogers park bryan wrote: Lincecum was 12-13 last year. Cain was 12-11 Also, Cain lasts longer in games and some of those losses went to RP in Lincecum's starts. Im with you, JORR that wins DO have value, but I would hardly call them the only stat that matters. Well, ultimately they're the only stat that matters. I suppose if you're the guy in the position of possibly signing a pitcher to a long term deal or you're interested in drafting him for your fantasy team, all kinds of other numbers might lead you to believe his results will be better in the future. There are pitchers that pitch just good enough to lose. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Matt Cain |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: . There are pitchers that pitch just good enough to lose. No doubt. I dont think that applies to Cain though. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|