It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:07 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 1:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Joe Sheehan wrote:
With MLB defenses being as good as they are, strikeouts are not much worse in value than the average ball in play. Statistically speaking, the payoff for having a "two-strike approach" and simply getting the bat on the ball when behind in the count just isn't worth the investment.


If the BABIP on all balls in play is around .300, how can this be true?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
he would say being mr slappy lowers babip way down and only marginally reduces chance of striking out. I mean why not just be mr slappy all the time if its such a good idea. how's that work for darwin barney?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
That lucky son of a bitch Miguel Cabrera had a .346 Bapip coming into this year



Bapip is useful just to check if there's an extreme situation above 400 below 220


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
supports sheehan's argument. if you crush the ball your babip will be higher.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 10:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
supports sheehan's argument. if you crush the ball your babip will be higher.


I'm not sure that's true. I think BABIP is very high on bunt attempts. Of course, it probably wouldn't be if every guy bunted every time. But yeah, a guy who hits a lot of hard line shots is going to have a higher BABIP than a guy who pops up a lot.

Anyway, unless the percentage of safe on dropped third strikes is higher than 30%, Sheehan is just wrong. It's a case of simply spouting one SABRmetric argument while ignoring another. Very bernsteinian. No wonder li'l danny likes him so much.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I think he made a flippant comment which may or may not be true. He should back it up with evidence. However, I could easily believe it IS true. Do you want Abreu gripping and ripping 0-2 or do you want him slapping a grounder to second?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 10:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
I think he made a flippant comment which may or may not be true. He should back it up with evidence. However, I could easily believe it IS true. Do you want Abreu gripping and ripping 0-2 or do you want him slapping a grounder to second?


I think that's situational. I'm sure you would agree with that.

Anyway, I don't really think that your elite power hitters are the issue here. Those types have always struck out at relatively high rates. The fact that they didn't is what made guys like Williams and DiMaggio so special.

The fact that pretty much nobody has a two-strike approach that is a big factor in the huge strikeout totals we're seeing currently. Wouldn't you like to see Beckham or Alexei choke up and put the ball in play rather than flailing away at a two strike pitch?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I don't know the answer to that question. If there's a man on third, one out, yes, just slap the ball. Otherwise (??) I dunno.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Joe Sheehan wrote:
With MLB defenses being as good as they are, strikeouts are not much worse in value than the average ball in play. Statistically speaking, the payoff for having a "two-strike approach" and simply getting the bat on the ball when behind in the count just isn't worth the investment.


If the BABIP on all balls in play is around .300, how can this be true?

Matt Carpenter earned himself a shiny new contract worth a lot of paper, due in large part to his two-strike approach...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group