Just to be clear, I voted with the minority.
I suppose I could replace "with" with "for", but that'd be sexist.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Which one of these posts was more insulting? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=74404 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Rod [ Mon Oct 29, 2012 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which one of these posts was more insulting? |
I can't say for sure, but they were both correct. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which one of these posts was more insulting? |
It's generally not insulting if you're accurately describing a person, particularly when based at least partially on observable facts. |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which one of these posts was more insulting? |
Not nearly as insulting as OKC saying Kevin Martin is better than James Harden. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which one of these posts was more insulting? |
Just to be clear, I voted with the minority. I suppose I could replace "with" with "for", but that'd be sexist.
|
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which one of these posts was more insulting? |
Keeping Score wrote: I'm staying out of this. Asshole. 
|
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which one of these posts was more insulting? |
Keeping Score wrote: I'm staying out of this. Keeeping Score......I'm keeping you in my inner circle 
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which one of these posts was more insulting? |
I'm with OKC. Fuck these old guys. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|