Wow, my memory was off, I didn't realize his thoughts were that bad.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Robinson Cano https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=81983 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Northside_Dan [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Robinson Cano |
Reportedly wants 10 years 300 million. Go home son, you're drunk. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Somebody will end up giving him 8-10 years at $250mil. I just hope its not the White Sox. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Northside_Dan wrote: Reportedly wants 10 years 300 million. Go home son, you're drunk. His gifted agent, GENIUS! They know who he is and about how much, no need to out the price tag out there. Just limited your market. Nice work |
|
| Author: | Jaw Breaker [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Great player, but my guess is he'll get no more than 6 x $24m. His official age is 31 (this October), so he's probably 34. |
|
| Author: | Bucky Chris [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
I think it makes sense to hype your client, and if you can get him above value, it's going to bring more clients. But Jay-Z is making a mistake here. I don't think he will even get $250mm. I wouldn't be shocked if the contract is $200mm. It's just going to make Jay-Z look bad when he doesn't get anywhere near $300mm. Trout is worth $300mm, Harper probably too. Not Cano. |
|
| Author: | Apologist [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Teams are getting an extra cut of the TV contracts next year, ~$30M per team. That probably has been factored into a few teams already and escalated some signings. Still, it only takes 1 drunk owner... i guess he stays in NY, in the 8/$27 range |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
With where the Yankees are, I don't think they can afford to let him go. |
|
| Author: | Bucky Chris [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Yankees reportedly offered him $168mm. They are faaaarrrr apart. Edit: this was earlier this year |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Bucky Chris wrote: Yankees reportedly offered him $168mm. They are faaaarrrr apart. Edit: this was earlier this year Depending on other offers tendered (or not), it might not seem as far apart in January as it does now. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Bucky Chris wrote: Yankees reportedly offered him $168mm. They are faaaarrrr apart. Edit: this was earlier this year Bigfan said the Cubs could get this done for 5 Years/$100 Million |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
| Wow, my memory was off, I didn't realize his thoughts were that bad. |
|
| Author: | conns7901 [ Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Unless hes got some good HGH no way in hell is he worth even 200 for ten years. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 8:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Douchebag wrote: Bucky Chris wrote: Yankees reportedly offered him $168mm. They are faaaarrrr apart. Edit: this was earlier this year Bigfan said the Cubs could get this done for 5 Years/$100 Million |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
bigfan wrote: Northside_Dan wrote: Reportedly wants 10 years 300 million. Go home son, you're drunk. His gifted agent, GENIUS! They know who he is and about how much, no need to out the price tag out there. Just limited your market. Nice work All agents do this. I'm sure you remember the A-Rod and Pujols negotiations. Robinson Cano you coming with me... |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
He has really nice numbers playing one of the lower impact defensive positions in the game. I have no idea what that is worth these days |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
good dolphin wrote: He has really nice numbers playing one of the lower impact defensive positions in the game. I have no idea what that is worth these days Historically 2nd basemen (not on steroids) dramatically decline after 32. I would pass but considering Pedroia just got $100M someone will give Cano at least $200M. |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Dodgers need a second baseman. Should have no problem getting money from them. Back up plan would be the Mariners if he only cared about money. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Big Chicagoan wrote: Dodgers need a second baseman. Should have no problem getting money from them. Back up plan would be the Mariners if he only cared about money. I know the Dodgers print money but even they have to have a limit unless they win the WS. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Nas wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Dodgers need a second baseman. Should have no problem getting money from them. Back up plan would be the Mariners if he only cared about money. I know the Dodgers print money but even they have to have a limit unless they win the WS. Mattingly, unlimited funds, all star team It just fits |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
immessedup17 wrote: I'd give him 4 years at $22-23M a year. No more years, no more money. I would rather spend that $23 million a year on 2, maybe 3, players that would help me win.
|
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
rogers park bryan wrote: Nas wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Dodgers need a second baseman. Should have no problem getting money from them. Back up plan would be the Mariners if he only cared about money. I know the Dodgers print money but even they have to have a limit unless they win the WS. Mattingly, unlimited funds, all star team It just fits Yep. Donny Baseball will have a budding dynasty on his hands. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
Terry's Peeps wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Nas wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Dodgers need a second baseman. Should have no problem getting money from them. Back up plan would be the Mariners if he only cared about money. I know the Dodgers print money but even they have to have a limit unless they win the WS. Mattingly, unlimited funds, all star team It just fits Yep. Donny Baseball will have a budding dynasty on his hands. Magic is giving every player "the antidote" |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
immessedup17 wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: immessedup17 wrote: I'd give him 4 years at $22-23M a year. No more years, no more money. I would rather spend that $23 million a year on 2, maybe 3, players that would help me win.2B is a tough position to get a ton of production out of. Which is why his value is higher than if he were an OF. Believe me, I want the Cubs to focus almost all of their free agent dollars on pitching in the next few years. Especially given the position player prospects the Cubs have. But it is hard to not give Cano a passing thought. 2B has not been good for the Cubs. Maybe, if that is where Baez ends up, it'll be different. Right now in about 450 more AB's,Cano has 16 more HR's then Donnie Murphy. He is batting .313,Murph is at .259. So if Murphy played 2nd all year he might have about the same number of HR's for about 29 million dollars cheaper. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
immessedup17 wrote: I can't believe for a minute you tried to seriously attempt making that comparison. I agree.Mr Pasta would have been better off comparing Murphy to Mike Trout. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Robinson Cano |
immessedup17 wrote: Almost as dumb as comparing Brett Jackson to Mike Trout. Gall. What I am comparing is dollars for value. No shit,Cano is better then Murphy. My question is he 29 million dollars a season better. I'm pretty sure the answer is no. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|