Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Scott Rolen
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=88405
Page 1 of 2

Author:  redskingreg [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Scott Rolen

First ballot HOF. Not a doubt in my mind.

Author:  Chilli Palmer [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Clearly your home has a gas leak.

Author:  lipidquadcab [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

redskingreg wrote:
First ballot HOF. Not a doubt in my mind.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  312player [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Lets pray for a spark.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

The point is, nobody in his right mind could think Aramis Ramirez was better than Scott Rolen. And Scott Rolen ain't making the Hall of Fame.

Author:  KDdidit [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The point is, nobody in his right mind could think Aramis Ramirez was better than Scott Rolen. And Scott Rolen ain't making the Hall of Fame.

Wait til Bernstein gets on BR and tells you about his similarity scores!

edit:
Hell I'll look it up. Scott Rolen's #1 similarity is...Aramis Ramirez. ARam's is Matt Williams with Rolen #2

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Besides Pujols, Trout, Cabrera, and Jeter... no other active player will ever make the HOF.

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The point is, nobody in his right mind could think Aramis Ramirez was better than Scott Rolen. And Scott Rolen ain't making the Hall of Fame.


Winner Winner Chicken Dinner

Author:  spanky [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Big Chicagoan wrote:
Besides Pujols, Trout, Cabrera, and Jeter... no other active player will ever make the HOF.

You forgot Sale, Abreu, and, of course, Buerhle.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Big Chicagoan wrote:
Besides Pujols, Trout, Cabrera, and Jeter... no other active player will ever make the HOF.


It's way too soon to put Trout in that group. And barring his career being over, Verlander is probably going to make it. And maybe Sabathia too. They're not just going to stop putting starting pitchers in simply because nobody gets enough decisions to make 250 career wins anymore.

Author:  312player [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Big Chicagoan wrote:
Besides Pujols, Trout, Cabrera, and Jeter... no other active player will ever make the HOF.




What? Ortiz
Kershaw
King Felix
ill be back with more soon...Rolen is getting in..bank it

Author:  KDdidit [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Ichiro

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

KDdidit wrote:
Ichiro


Good one, he is definitely in.

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Besides Pujols, Trout, Cabrera, and Jeter... no other active player will ever make the HOF.


It's way too soon to put Trout in that group. And barring his career being over, Verlander is probably going to make it. And maybe Sabathia too. They're not just going to stop putting starting pitchers in simply because nobody gets enough decisions to make 250 career wins anymore.


So is 200 going to be the new benchmark or even lower? If it's 200 then you have to look at a Tim Hudson, Bartolo Colon and Buerhle...

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Besides Pujols, Trout, Cabrera, and Jeter... no other active player will ever make the HOF.


It's way too soon to put Trout in that group. And barring his career being over, Verlander is probably going to make it. And maybe Sabathia too. They're not just going to stop putting starting pitchers in simply because nobody gets enough decisions to make 250 career wins anymore.


So is 200 going to be the new benchmark or even lower? If it's 200 then you have to look at a Tim Hudson, Bartolo Colon and Buerhle...



Most pitchers dominant years will be to small of a window to get in. Look at Lincecum. Verlander's dominant days are done. Felix and Kershaw have the best chance, but they have to stay healthy.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

How good was Maddux then? I believe that he had a 5 year stretch where he had an ERA below 2 and he won at least 15 games for about 17 years in a row.

Author:  312player [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

You can't put a number on wins anymore ...pedro is getting in...he's under 300

Miguel Cabrera is a no doubter..good call on Ichiro.

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Nas wrote:
How good was Maddux then? I believe that he had a 5 year stretch where he had an ERA below 2 and he won at least 15 games for about 17 years in a row.


Great in the regular season but meh in the postseason.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Hank Scorpio wrote:
Nas wrote:
How good was Maddux then? I believe that he had a 5 year stretch where he had an ERA below 2 and he won at least 15 games for about 17 years in a row.


Great in the regular season but meh in the postseason.


You just have to get in.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Big Chicagoan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Besides Pujols, Trout, Cabrera, and Jeter... no other active player will ever make the HOF.


It's way too soon to put Trout in that group. And barring his career being over, Verlander is probably going to make it. And maybe Sabathia too. They're not just going to stop putting starting pitchers in simply because nobody gets enough decisions to make 250 career wins anymore.


So is 200 going to be the new benchmark or even lower? If it's 200 then you have to look at a Tim Hudson, Bartolo Colon and Buerhle...


Most pitchers dominant years will be to small of a window to get in. Look at Lincecum. Verlander's dominant days are done. Felix and Kershaw have the best chance, but they have to stay healthy.


Well, yeah, staying healthy is the whole ballgame. But Verlander has a head start on someone like Kershaw, who could easily have a career ending injury tomorrow. He's already at 150 wins and has been the best pitcher in his league over the last ten years. He's going to have over 2000 strikeouts. Kershaw is going to do those things too if he stays on the field. But that's a big "if" these days. I can make a lot better case for Verlander than I could for guys like Buehrle and Colon. I'm just not sure how the voters are going to adjust to the new paradigms. It can't be that no starting pitchers ever make it in again.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

312player wrote:
You can't put a number on wins anymore ...pedro is getting in...he's under 300

Miguel Cabrera is a no doubter..good call on Ichiro.


There was never a strict numbers requirement on wins. Bob Gibson won 251 games. But a career looks different these days. I'm not sure Verlander's 170 wouldn't relate to Gibson's 250.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Why does it seem like the best pitchers can't stay healthy?

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


Well, yeah, staying healthy is the whole ballgame. But Verlander has a head start on someone like Kershaw, who could easily have a career ending injury tomorrow. He's already at 150 wins and has been the best pitcher in his league over the last ten years. He's going to have over 2000 strikeouts. Kershaw is going to do those things too if he stays on the field. But that's a big "if" these days. I can make a lot better case for Verlander than I could for guys like Buehrle and Colon. I'm just not sure how the voters are going to adjust to the new paradigms. It can't be that no starting pitchers ever make it in again.


I think what you are going to find is that very few people will be getting into the HOF in the next 20-30 years.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Nas wrote:
Why does it seem like the best pitchers can't stay healthy?


I heard Stone last week blaming the lowering of the mound and the fact that it's so much more difficult to throw an effective curve so several generations of pitchers have relied upon sliders and cutters which put much more stress on the arm. As good a theory as any.

Author:  Apologist [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 7:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

I don't think it's a coincidence the best curveballs in the game happen to belong to the best pitchers. Kershaw, Wainwright, Jose Fernandez, King Felix.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 7:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Apologist wrote:
I don't think it's a coincidence the best curveballs in the game happen to belong to the best pitchers. Kershaw, Wainwright, Jose Fernandez, King Felix.


Half of your list had Tommy John surgery.

Author:  Apologist [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 8:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Nas wrote:
Apologist wrote:
I don't think it's a coincidence the best curveballs in the game happen to belong to the best pitchers. Kershaw, Wainwright, Jose Fernandez, King Felix.


Half of your list had Tommy John surgery.

Your point? A similar percentage of legendary pitchers would have had TJS in their respective eras of dominance as well, if Tommy John surgery had existed. Guys who throw 200+ (300+ back in the day) frames every year, are eventually going to blow out their arms. A well-thrown curve is probably less stressful on the elbow, shoulder, and arm in general than the splitter, cutter, and especially the slider. The guys I mentioned all have slider, but it's generally not their breaking ball of choice (the big looping Uncle Charlie). We are fast approaching a point where all pitchers who have an 6-10+ year career will eventually go under the knife.

Author:  Apologist [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 8:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

All that aside, I believe Rolen has a case, but won't get in. Rolen, before the hard turfs in Philly contributed to his back problems that would derail his career-- was the best all around 3B in the game since Schmidt.

Beltre will get in eventually. Aramis Ramirez has no chance.

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 8:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Troy Tulowitzki (if he stays healthy) and Konerko have a chance

Author:  Nas [ Tue Aug 12, 2014 8:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Scott Rolen

Apologist wrote:
Nas wrote:
Apologist wrote:
I don't think it's a coincidence the best curveballs in the game happen to belong to the best pitchers. Kershaw, Wainwright, Jose Fernandez, King Felix.


Half of your list had Tommy John surgery.

Your point? A similar percentage of legendary pitchers would have had TJS in their respective eras of dominance as well, if Tommy John surgery had existed. Guys who throw 200+ (300+ back in the day) frames every year, are eventually going to blow out their arms. A well-thrown curve is probably less stressful on the elbow, shoulder, and arm in general than the splitter, cutter, and especially the slider. The guys I mentioned all have slider, but it's generally not their breaking ball of choice (the big looping Uncle Charlie). We are fast approaching a point where all pitchers who have an 6-10+ year career will eventually go under the knife.


That most of the great pitchers today get hurt unlike they did when I was growing up. Greg Maddux and Roger Clemens didn't need Tommy John even though they pitched many more innings. If you're great today there is a good chance your arm will fall off.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/