Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

This San Diego Padres thing
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=92088
Page 1 of 1

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Mon Feb 09, 2015 10:49 am ]
Post subject:  This San Diego Padres thing

Crazy off-season. It probably wont work out (in the first year at least) but it should be very interesting.

Ian Kennedy is still a good pitcher. Now they have Shields. If Cashner stays healthy (If Prior stays healthy) they'll have a nice rotation.



The Padres’ offseason moves may not guarantee the playoffs, but they certainly guarantee enthusiasm
Craig Calcaterra Feb 9, 2015, 9:00 AM EST
19 Comments
San Diego Padres Logo
The Padres had had a busy winter already, but the signing of James Shields last night pushes it toward the ridiculous. If they get Cole Hamels, everyone in San Diego may plotz. Heck, they may plotz anyway after acquiring Matt Kemp, Derek Norris, Justin Upton, Wil Myers, Brandon Morrow Will Middlebrooks, Shawn Kelley, Brandon Maurer Josh Johnson and now Shields. It’s a totally different team than it was last year.

Is it a better team? Almost certainly. Even if Matt Kemp continues to have injury issues and Justin Upton remains the good-but-not-as-good-as-people-thought-he’d-one-day-be player from his early days in Arizona, the offense is improved. If Kemp looks like he did in the second half last year and Wil Myers rebounds to his rookie form, all bets are off. Shields provides them with a near-certain 200+ above average and, occasionally, excellent innings. The team is much stronger than it’s been.

That doesn’t mean Padres fans should start setting aside money for playoff ticket deposits yet, of course. There are a lot of uncertainties here. The new hitters conquering Petco Park is not a given, even if they are healthy. Shields has a lot of miles on the odometer. The Padres were just a 77-win team last year and, as history has shown, making 15-20 game improvements in a single season is not an easy trick. Ask the 2013 Blue Jays and 2012 Marlins how adding a bunch of big pieces in a single offseason can go.

But there is definitely reason for excitement in San Diego. For one thing, all of these additions came at a relatively limited cost. The Padres did not give up any of their top prospects to acquire the talent they got and, even if you include Shields’ deal, none of the financial outlays for the new players are particularly crazy. The future has not been mortgaged for a one-year improvement. Indeed, this could just be a year in which the Padres makes a nice little competitive surge that gets the fan base excited with a more traditional and sustained improvement on the horizon.

And that’s pretty key with this franchise. The fan base excitement. The Padres have had some successful seasons over the years, but they were somewhat isolated and never came by virtue of ownership opening up the safe and truly investing in the team. Before this offseason, their biggest-ever free agent deal was Joaquin Freakin’ Benoit, for crying out loud.

A lot of Padres fans I know — some I met as recently as back in December at the Winter Meetings — would’ve never believed that the team would be as active in the offseason as they have been this year. That Padres brass would do the sorts of things to stir up some excitement and get the Padres faithful to shell out for tickets and merch with the level of enthusiasm they are likely to this spring.

Maybe what the Padres did this winter is not enough to make the playoffs — the Giants and Dodgers aren’t going anywhere any time soon, after all — but they have certainly taken some much needed steps to kick up some excitement in San Diego.

Author:  RFDC [ Mon Feb 09, 2015 10:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This San Diego Padres thing

They will have a fire sale before too long.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Mon Feb 09, 2015 11:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This San Diego Padres thing

RFDC wrote:
They will have a fire sale before too long.

That's what people said about the Dodgers when they made the Boston trade.

San Diego isnt LA but we'll see

Author:  RFDC [ Mon Feb 09, 2015 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This San Diego Padres thing

rogers park bryan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
They will have a fire sale before too long.

That's what people said about the Dodgers when they made the Boston trade.

San Diego isnt LA but we'll see

yeah they aren't LA and they aren't the Marlins.

But they are closer to being the Marlins than the Dodgers IMO.

I think they will try to compete this year and if it does not go well you may see a fire sale the next year.

I hope I am wrong, I would like to see someone other than the Giants and Dodgers be good in the West.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Mon Feb 09, 2015 11:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This San Diego Padres thing

These "dream team" plug every hole in one offseasons don't usually yield instant results. Hmmmm

Author:  Chus [ Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This San Diego Padres thing

Shields and Myers were traded for one another. Now, they are teammates somewhere else.

Author:  Hussra [ Mon Feb 09, 2015 7:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This San Diego Padres thing

Assembling the roster Maddon wants when he returns to San Diego in 2 years.

Author:  RFDC [ Sat Jul 11, 2015 6:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This San Diego Padres thing

Quote:
Padres Notes: Shields, Kimbrel, Grandal
By Charlie Wilmoth [July 11, 2015 at 1:56pm CDT]
Despite a disappointing 39-49 season thus far, the Padres aren’t planning a complete rebuild, Dennis Lin of the San Diego Union-Tribune writes. “We think we’re smarter to put all of our energy into competing year after year after year,” says Padres lead investor Peter Seidler. “We think that’s what the fans want, we think that’s what San Diego wants, and we know that’s what we want.” The Padres’ plans also won’t be dictated by the fact that they host next year’s All-Star Game either, however. “I think ultimately, we’re going to make decisions that are for the best of the franchise and not say, ‘Hey, we have to be at this point because we have the All-Star Game in San Diego next year,'” says GM A.J. Preller. The Padres have a few key players set for free agency after the season, including Justin Upton, Ian Kennedy and Will Venable. Many of their other key players, though, including James Shields, Craig Kimbrel, Tyson Ross, Andrew Cashner, Derek Norris, Yonder Alonso, Wil Myers and Matt Kemp, are under control beyond this season, so they could conceivably make another run at contention next year. That could be tricky, however, given the talent they parted with to acquire many of those players. Here’s more out of San Diego.

Some in the Padres organization believe the team should trade Shields this summer, promoting him as a lower-cost option than Cole Hamels, ESPN’s Buster Olney writes (subscription only). There’s also belief within the organization that they should consider trading Kimbrel as well. Olney suggests Shields (who will make $21MM in each of the next three seasons, plus a $2MM buyout or a $16MM option in 2019) could make sense for the Cubs, Blue Jays or Dodgers. If the Padres were to trade players like Shields and Kimbrel, though, the question would be how they would explain such an abrupt change of course to their fan base.
Catcher Yasmani Grandal feels the Padres didn’t handle him well, Matt Calkins of the Union-Tribune writes. The team had Andrew Cashner, Tyson Ross and Ian Kennedy all pitch to Rene Rivera, leaving Grandal without enough playing time to find a rhythm at the plate. Grandal thought Padres pitchers should be throwing inside early in counts, and the pitchers disagreed. Also, his 2013 PED suspension might have led to further distrust in the Padres clubhouse. This season, Grandal has hit .276/.398/.519 and framed pitches well after heading to the Dodgers in the Kemp deal, while Padres pitchers have struggled.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/