It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 11:54 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 453 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Did I miss something? I thought the Cubs won last night. :scratch:

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43550
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Did I miss something? I thought the Cubs won last night. :scratch:

Whoever wins, we lose.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Did I miss something? I thought the Cubs won last night. :scratch:

I didn't say they lost.
But they did need a 4 out save from marmol in order to recover from the bad bullpen that they wanted to save for today to back up a pitcher expected to be not good.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43550
Darkside wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Did I miss something? I thought the Cubs won last night. :scratch:

I didn't say they lost.
But they did need a 4 out save from marmol in order to recover from the bad bullpen that they wanted to save for today to back up a pitcher expected to be not good.

Goose Gossage used to get 3 innings saves all the time. The bullpen needs to nut up.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
immessedup17 wrote:
OH NO A FOUR OUT SAVE SO UNCOMMON PANIC PANIC PANIC

Take it easy there little guy.
We're not concerned at all with the rising usage and pitch counts of the only real asset to this bullpen/team in general?
Marmol is the best thing they got going.
And also, since you missed the whole point, they overtax the back end of the bullpen because they needed him to recover from the bullpen blowing a lead in a game in which they didn't want to overtax the bullpen to save it for the next day in which they expect to need to overtax teh bullpen.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Douchebag wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Did I miss something? I thought the Cubs won last night. :scratch:

I didn't say they lost.
But they did need a 4 out save from marmol in order to recover from the bad bullpen that they wanted to save for today to back up a pitcher expected to be not good.

Goose Gossage used to get 3 innings saves all the time. The bullpen needs to nut up.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I guess I missed all the games where Gossage threw like Marmol does.
How did I miss those? DAMNIT!

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Darkside wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Did I miss something? I thought the Cubs won last night. :scratch:

I didn't say they lost.
But they did need a 4 out save from marmol in order to recover from the bad bullpen that they wanted to save for today to back up a pitcher expected to be not good.


I was just pointing out that you said you cared about winning today and worrying about tomorrow tomorrow. Quade left Dempster in as long as he did because outside of Marmol and Marshall I dont think he trusts anyone in the bullpen. He was trying to win that game, unfortunately Dempster didnt do him any favors.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Oh and to make it CLEAR!
I don't advocate firing Quade... but he's being exposed for what he is early this season I think.
ANYWAY, might as well have Quade, because this team even with awesome coaching/managing is still a .500 team at best.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Did I miss something? I thought the Cubs won last night. :scratch:

I didn't say they lost.
But they did need a 4 out save from marmol in order to recover from the bad bullpen that they wanted to save for today to back up a pitcher expected to be not good.


I was just pointing out that you said you cared about winning today and worrying about tomorrow tomorrow. Quade left Dempster in as long as he did because outside of Marmol and Marshall I dont think he trusts anyone in the bullpen. He was trying to win that game, unfortunately Dempster didnt do him any favors.

Right. You're getting close to what I was trying to say... the reason Demp was in was to save the bullpen. But his being in meant that the bullpen was used more heavily than they would have liked to. Leaving Demp in as long as they did meant having their strongest presence in the bullpen get overextended, or shall I say throwing longer and more pitches than they would have liked. Turn that gave over to the pen in the 7th with a 4 run lead and maybe you don't even NEED Marmol yesterday.
He managed himself all back asswards in that game.
In my opinion.
But I don't want him farrd!

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
immessedup17 wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Oh and to make it CLEAR!
I don't advocate firing Quade... but he's being exposed for what he is early this season I think.
ANYWAY, might as well have Quade, because this team even with awesome coaching/managing is still a .500 team at best.


So you're saying .500 either way? Got it.

I would more or less be shocked if the Cubs win 82 games this year. I don't think that's even a realistic goal.
I could be pleasantly surprised. But I doubt it. What I'm saying is that Quade certainly won't manage them into winning any games that they wouldn't have won on talent.

NEWS ITEM: Quade to review signals today!!!

That's the sign of a well managed team folks. :?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Darkside wrote:
Right. You're getting close to what I was trying to say... the reason Demp was in was to save the bullpen. But his being in meant that the bullpen was used more heavily than they would have liked to. Leaving Demp in as long as they did meant having their strongest presence in the bullpen get overextended, or shall I say throwing longer and more pitches than they would have liked. Turn that gave over to the pen in the 7th with a 4 run lead and maybe you don't even NEED Marmol yesterday.
He managed himself all back asswards in that game.
In my opinion.
But I don't want him farrd!


I see what you are saying but in my opinion I think a tired Dempster is better than the non-Marmol part of their bullpen at this point. That opinion was proved wrong this time but I dont know if it was a bad idea. You didnt want to have to use Marmol or Marshall but Dempster shit the bed and forced your hand.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
immessedup17 wrote:
I think every discussion regarding Quade's ability to manage should be prefaced with the statement that he is entering this 2nd full week as a big league manager.

Every manager in the history of baseball, Hall-of-Famers or one-and-doner's alike, probably have...interesting first seasons.

Ok, we can discuss the merit of having a complete rookie coach the 5th most expensive team in the league.
Personally, I don't really think that it's a great idea learning on the job in one of the hottest sports markets in the United States. Of course that's not Quade's fault, but true regardless.
And by the time you are managing a MLB team, there's no 11 day "I can't believe they expect things of me" ramp.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
quade was the cheapest option and he will be gone with hendry very soon, castro is the only reason to even tune in an watch this train wreck..80 wins in this division is not difficult..the fun starts when the schedule gets harder i anticipate some long losing streaks starting in may when the schedule begins to get harder..quade is in over his head and it will show, this team is no damn good

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Right. You're getting close to what I was trying to say... the reason Demp was in was to save the bullpen. But his being in meant that the bullpen was used more heavily than they would have liked to. Leaving Demp in as long as they did meant having their strongest presence in the bullpen get overextended, or shall I say throwing longer and more pitches than they would have liked. Turn that gave over to the pen in the 7th with a 4 run lead and maybe you don't even NEED Marmol yesterday.
He managed himself all back asswards in that game.
In my opinion.
But I don't want him farrd!


I see what you are saying but in my opinion I think a tired Dempster is better than the non-Marmol part of their bullpen at this point. That opinion was proved wrong this time but I dont know if it was a bad idea. You didnt want to have to use Marmol or Marshall but Dempster shit the bed and forced your hand.

My beef is that Demp HAD to be really fucking tired going into that 7th. Ramirez' boner cost him 16 extra pitches at the end of the 6th. You gotta know your players better as a manager.
This one, along with the missed signals games, go as a -1 each on his record as a manager. Of the games they won, I don't think I saw a managing decision really affect the outcome to give him a +1. In other words, hes managed his teams into more losses than wins, overall record aside.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Quade isn't in this position to win a championship now.
What he is however is:

1.Cheap
2.Not Lou
3.There to develop young players
4.There to instill a work ethic and a focus on fundamentals
5.There to get this team from point a to point b while shitty contracts expire.

When, if ever, this team is ready to contend he will not be the one leading them most likely.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
immessedup17 wrote:
Who cares about the Cubs payroll? The payroll for 2011 was not decided in 2011, or even 2010. This payroll was largely based on past mistakes. The team is not contending for anything this year...so being able to develop a possibly good manager at the same time you're already developing hopefully good players is perfectly acceptable.

Who cares?
The owner for one. He's nervous. What do you think a businessman will do with a team when they have high payroll, a bad record, and the lowest attendance in 10 years? Do you think honestly that with sagging interest in the club from the public he's going to do what TT did? Just blow more money into the team?
Who cares? You should dude. You should care that they got no real chance of winning anything, an owner beginning to lose his ass and a manager who doesn't really appear to have a handle on the job.
The window is closed for quite some time in my opinion, and this is just the beginning of a period of suck.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43550
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Quade isn't in this position to win a championship now.
What he is however is:

1.Cheap
2.Not Lou
3.There to develop young players
4.There to instill a work ethic and a focus on fundamentals
5.There to get this team from point a to point b while shitty contracts expire.

When, if ever, this team is ready to contend he will not be the one leading them most likely.

+5

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Quade made the right call leaving Dempster in as long as he did. The fact that the decision ultimately backfired is just called baseball.

Considering Houston's offense, James Russell starting today and the lead you had,, Quade needed to give Demp a chance to finish out the inning. I don't blame him for this one bit.

Byrd's stolen base attempt remains as a -1 though

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:26 pm
Posts: 1564
If the Cubs are so concerned about overtaxing the bullpen, why are they going with this idea of starting Russell for 3 innings or so then the parade of relievers after that. Bring up someone from AAA to start and have him go five innings or so. If you need to sacrifice a game, then sacrifice today's game. Then have your bullpen somewhat rested for wednesday so you can maybe take a series.

The last thing I want to hear Wednesday is the old, "well the bullpen is worn out and some arms aren't available."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I cant wait to bump this thread when they win the division. 8)

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 3351
Location: Far East 'burbs.
pizza_Place: Pasaro's, St. Joe, MI.
How is Quade an unknown, rookie manager? What about the games he managed last year? I'm not advocating firing him, either, nor will I be surprised by any managing mistakes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Northside_Dan wrote:
Quade made the right call leaving Dempster in as long as he did. The fact that the decision ultimately backfired is just called baseball.

Considering Houston's offense, James Russell starting today and the lead you had,, Quade needed to give Demp a chance to finish out the inning. I don't blame him for this one bit.

Byrd's stolen base attempt remains as a -1 though

You make an excellent point and I totally get where you're coming from. I disagree with you because fundamentally, I think you play the game in front of you and then worry about the next day. Maybe in late July or later you start worrying about saving pen guys for tomorrow.
That being said I don't like Marmol being needed for 4 out saves. That's got bad news written all over it. Fuckin pens got a couple guys that Quade will not put in even under desperation situations. They're only coming in under mopup rules. That's certainly not Quade's fault, but it don't help him none either.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
On this Dempster decision.......If he has 102 through 8 then I leave him in for the 9th. He had 102 through 6 though, which means he was laboring. I wouldn't have pushed it right now. He wasn't very sharp in his first 2 starts so a nice 6 inning 1 run game would be good to get under his belt right now. In the end this means nothing and they won they game anyways. My bigger concern is why are they going with this stupid bad bullpen pitcher day? Just bring up Diamond already. The I cubs will survive without him for a few days.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
On this Dempster decision.......If he has 102 through 8 then I leave him in for the 9th. He had 102 through 6 though, which means he was laboring. I wouldn't have pushed it right now. He wasn't very sharp in his first 2 starts so a nice 6 inning 1 run game would be good to get under his belt right now. In the end this means nothing and they won they game anyways. My bigger concern is why are they going with this stupid bad bullpen pitcher day? Just bring up Diamond already. The I cubs will survive without him for a few days.

Right.
Don't forget, he didn't cruise through the 6th either. I think he threw over 25 in the 6th... maybe more. I read he threw 16 after the error.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Both UMN and Darko make good points.

I think you have to trust that Dempster is a veteran and that he understands the situation the team is in with Wells/Cash on the DL. He was definitely laboring, but hopefully he won't take the additional runs as a hit on his confidence since he does have a track record of being a moderately effective starting pitcher.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
The current situation with the Cubs is they have an owner who has no business owning the team...a GM who has no business being the GM...& a Manager who has no business being the Manager. Other than that, everything's great!

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Scorehead wrote:
The current situation with the Cubs is they have an owner who has no business owning the team...a GM who has no business being the GM...& a Manager who has no business being the Manager. Other than that, everything's great!


I only agree with one of these statements.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Northside_Dan wrote:
I think you have to trust that Dempster is a veteran and that he understands the situation the team is in with Wells/Cash on the DL. He was definitely laboring, but hopefully he won't take the additional runs as a hit on his confidence since he does have a track record of being a moderately effective starting pitcher.

Here's an interesting split...
ERA by inning (career)
1st 5.14
2nd 3.11
3rd 4.52
4th 4.57
5th 5.44 :shock:
6th 4.02
7th 5.11

Now I think that his inflated 5th inning shows that he gets gassed around then as a starter... I think his lower 6th inning shows more bullpen stats than starter stats... but wow he likes to get behind early huh?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
The current situation with the Cubs is they have an owner who has no business owning the team...a GM who has no business being the GM...& a Manager who has no business being the Manager. Other than that, everything's great!


I only agree with one of these statements.


You'll come around on Ricketts & Quade.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Quade
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Hey Quade, do you think you need to make a pitching change? Maybe get a guy ready in the bullpen? Learned that one yet??


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 453 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group