It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 7:53 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
W_Z wrote:
what does that have to do with the bulls? did you think i was taking a shot or something? like you usually do?

TM - rose is averaging 27 pts, 6.8 assists in the playoffs. that's not bad. i think he took over the first 2 pacers games and practically won them himself, too.


I'm not saying he's been bad, just that he hasn't played at a high enough level to take the Bulls to the NBA Finals--or maybe even beyond the 2nd round of the playoffs. Has he looked like the League MVP to you so far in the playoffs?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 7:59 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Q.Bovifs wrote:

If Rose didn't get hurt at the end, I would say it was a one-time thing.

Now, we are in big trouble. Absent chemical or hormonal/supplemental assistance, shredded tendons and ligaments just don't heal in the time we have left in the playoffs.

It IS possible that CJ could step up his game and the rest of the team could power home a series win, but that won't be enough if we were to make it to the next round. :(

Ronnie Brewer's thumb is injury 1B - he hasn't been as explosive or grabbbsy since.

And I think it is time to switch Boozer and Taj in the rotation - this time just to offset Joakim's absence on D. Seems like his old teammate has his number and intimidates him. Horford was top dog back in the day. Some Scottie & MJ type mental shit.


The Bulls didn't simply get "outshot"--their defense was abysmal in many instances.

What are you talking about with regard to "shredded tendons and ligaments" Are you referring to Rose's twisted ankle? Where has it been reported that his injury is as severe as you intimate?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
i just think rose can not do it alone, noah gets the ball past the free throw line and the offense stops..the def steps away and he has to pass it right back..bogans is not a threat to score and boozer has been under performing in the post season..rose can not do it with him and deng having to take almost every shot.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:04 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
312player wrote:
i just think rose can not do it alone, noah gets the ball past the free throw line and the offense stops..the def steps away and he has to pass it right back..bogans is not a threat to score and boozer has been under performing in the post season..rose can not do it with him and deng having to take almost every shot.


Agreed.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43581
Tall Midget wrote:
W_Z wrote:
what does that have to do with the bulls? did you think i was taking a shot or something? like you usually do?

TM - rose is averaging 27 pts, 6.8 assists in the playoffs. that's not bad. i think he took over the first 2 pacers games and practically won them himself, too.


I'm not saying he's been bad, just that he hasn't played at a high enough level to take the Bulls to the NBA Finals--or maybe even beyond the 2nd round of the playoffs. Has he looked like the League MVP to you so far in the playoffs?

He lived at the free-throw line in the first 4 games of the Indiana series. That's the reason his numbers were so good in the first round. I agree with TM, Rose has been mostly a disappointment so far in the playoffs.

And I agree with Panther about the Brewer injury. That guy is a force at the defensive end, and he hasn't done squat since hurting the thumb.

I'm not in full panic mode yet, but now they're in a must-win situation going into game 2, and you don't want to be in a situation like that so early in the series. I wouldn't say that the defense was terrible yesterday, Atlanta just seemed to be knocking down all of their tough shots. There really isn't anyway to defend 20 foot fall-away jumpers. Atlanta should come back down to earth a bit in Game 2.

As for the Rose injury, it didn't look too bad, but what the hell was he doing there? It was a 4 possession game at that point with about 8 seconds left, and he's getting up in someone's grill? The game was over, and the star player just hurt himself. Plus, what Rose did is kinda bush-league IMO.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43581
Q.Bovifs wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Plus, what Rose did is kinda bush-league IMO.

What did he do that was Bush-League?

You don't get up in someone's grill when the game is clearly over. There was less than 10 seconds left, and it was a 4 posession game.

A similar story happened last week with Patty Mills from the Trailblazers, and he got ripped by some people for it. Him and another teammate were pressuring the Mavs' PG with an 11 point deficit and 15 seconds left, and he got laid out by a screen. IMO, this situation was even worse because there was even less time on the clock.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:36 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Q.Bovifs wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Q.Bovifs wrote:

If Rose didn't get hurt at the end, I would say it was a one-time thing.

Now, we are in big trouble. Absent chemical or hormonal/supplemental assistance, shredded tendons and ligaments just don't heal in the time we have left in the playoffs.

It IS possible that CJ could step up his game and the rest of the team could power home a series win, but that won't be enough if we were to make it to the next round. :(

Ronnie Brewer's thumb is injury 1B - he hasn't been as explosive or grabbbsy since.

And I think it is time to switch Boozer and Taj in the rotation - this time just to offset Joakim's absence on D. Seems like his old teammate has his number and intimidates him. Horford was top dog back in the day. Some Scottie & MJ type mental shit.


The Bulls didn't simply get "outshot"--their defense was abysmal in many instances.

What are you talking about with regard to "shredded tendons and ligaments" Are you referring to Rose's twisted ankle? Where has it been reported that his injury is as severe as you intimate?

What do you think the mechanism of a twisted/sprained ankle are?

The joint doesn't go that way unless ligaments are compromised.

Each time it "gives", that is a novel injury and more tissue damage. Complete rupture is the next step.

Image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprained_ankle

A sprained ankle, also known as an ankle sprain, twisted ankle, rolled ankle, ankle injury or ankle ligament injury, is a common medical condition where one or more of the ligaments of the ankle is torn or partially torn.


First, you claimed that both tendons and ligaments were "shredded," not just his ligaments. Second, sprains vary in their severity. Rose's sprain yesterday looked minor to me, so I think your diagnosis of "shredded" ligaments is an exaggeration. Anyone who's ever played a sport has rolled an ankle and been fine in the next day or two, if not in less time. Some sprains heal quickly, others' don't.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Last edited by Tall Midget on Tue May 03, 2011 8:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43581
Is this the same ankle he injured against Indiana?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57250
Interesting. I do not think I have ever heard playing hard to the final buzzer as "bush league."

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:38 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Douchebag wrote:
Is this the same ankle he injured against Indiana?


Yes.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Bulls=One trick pony

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
RFDC wrote:
Interesting. I do not think I have ever heard playing hard to the final buzzer as "bush league."

Perhaps not bush-league, but definitely ill-advised.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57250
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Interesting. I do not think I have ever heard playing hard to the final buzzer as "bush league."

Perhaps not bush-league, but definitely ill-advised.


Maybe so, but I would much rather have a player who plays hard to the final buzzer than players who quit during the game because things are not going their way. The NBA is full of those type of players. Give me Rose any day.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43581
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Interesting. I do not think I have ever heard playing hard to the final buzzer as "bush league."

Perhaps not bush-league, but definitely ill-advised.

I just think it's uncalled for. This wasn't a 1 or 2 posession game. The team had zero chance of winning and now their star player reinjured his ankle. Can you think of any scenario where the Bulls would have been able to hit four 3-pointers in less than 10 seconds?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
RFDC wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Interesting. I do not think I have ever heard playing hard to the final buzzer as "bush league."

Perhaps not bush-league, but definitely ill-advised.


Maybe so, but I would much rather have a player who plays hard to the final buzzer than players who quit during the game because things are not going their way. The NBA is full of those type of players. Give me Rose any day.

Don't get me wrong. I love the fact that he goes all-out, but there are times when it's appropriate to dial it down a bit. They weren't gonna win the game at that point no matter what.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57250
Yeah I get what you guys are saying.

I would also like to point out the similarities between this years Bulls playoff run to the Blackhawks run last year.

Blackhawks struggled with the Preds and people were panicking thinking they were done.

In the 2nd round they came out and lost the first game to Vancouver and everyone was panicking thinking the run was over.

Sounds pretty simliar so far to the Bulls run. Not play well in the first round, lose the first game of the 2nd round. Hopefully the rest of the playoffs work out just like the Blackhawks.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Here's a largely forgettable and uninteresting article from Bernstein....

Bernstein: Rose, Thibs Off MessageMay 3, 2011 8:36 AM



CHICAGO (WSCR) One has been an extension of the other all season, as they have worked and spoken in lock-step synchronization to lead the Bulls to the NBA’s best record and the second round of the playoffs.

They will be able to compare their respective trophies today, after Derrick Rose receives his NBA MVP award. Tom Thibodeau got his well-earned Coach of the Year honor Sunday.

After every game this season, and specifically the uncommon losses, you could always count on the two to say essentially the same things, publicly. Rose would often be pulled aside by the TV sideline reporter for two or three quick answers, which would then be repeated by Thibodeau when he met reporters moments later. Right after that, more of the same, with identical descriptive phrases bouncing around the locker-room echo chamber.

That’s why I raised an eyebrow at the divergent comments from Rose and his coach after last night’s series-opening loss at home to Atlanta. Sounds like they saw different games, and we’re not used to that.

“There wasn’t one aspect of the defense that was good,” Thibodeau said of the Hawks’ .513 field goal percentage and .538 clip from three-point range. “We weren’t challenging shots, we weren’t keeping them in front of us, and we played a low-energy offense. The intensity wasn’t right.”

About that “challenging shots” thing, Rose disagreed, in a way that I cannot remember him doing before.

“They were hitting tough shots, guys on them,” he said. “They’re just good basketball players. Contested twos, contested threes, fadeaways.”

Hmm, ok.

How about the star turn by Atlanta’s Joe Johnson, who scored a game-high 34 points on 12-18 shooting, including all five of his threes?

Thibodeau: “Joe Johnson basically got where he wanted to go.”

Rose: “Joe was hitting tough shots, hard shots. We contested his shots well. He was in a groove, and that’s why he’s an all-star.”

I’m more inclined to look at the game as Rose seems to. Save for the flaccid first six minutes and some typically-lackluster hustle from Carlos Boozer (has there ever been a player with a higher differential between his level of histrionic expression and his actual production?), this looked more like a They-Made-Some-Crazy-Shots game than a total breakdown of defensive principle or execution.

A perfectionist like Thibodeau, though, just sees the 103 points, the high percentages and the losing result. Even if he dropped a game to a team that did nothing but drain desperation-heaves from midcourt at the end of every possession, he’d still blame his defense. He lives in a world where the opponent should never score at all, if his players are doing things right.

Rose is just being realistic, largely because he’s confident that percentages even out when enough tough shots are taken. He’s already grown up enough to tell the truth, and that’s all he did. If he thought the defense was terrible against Johnson and Jamal Crawford (who had some “wow” buckets of his own), he’d say so.

These men are the two biggest reasons why the Bulls are so good.

It’s worth noting that, for a night, they just had a rare difference of opinion on why they weren’t good enough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
I think the fact he had zero free throws and was settling for jumpers indicates his ankle is bothering him.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43581
I completely agree with what Bernstein is saying. Some of those shots Atlanta knocked down could not have been defended any better.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57250
Douchebag wrote:
I completely agree with what Bernstein is saying. Some of those shots Atlanta knocked down could not have been defended any better.


I agree as well and that makes me feel pretty good about the rest of the series. No way they keep shooting that way.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Q.Bovifs wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Q.Bovifs wrote:
Absent chemical or hormonal/supplemental assistance, shredded tendons and ligaments just don't heal in the time we have left in the playoffs.

First, you claimed that both tendons and ligaments were "shredded," not just his ligaments. Second, sprains vary in their severity. Rose's sprain yesterday looked minor to me, so I think your diagnosis of "shredded" ligaments is an exaggeration. Anyone who's ever played a sport has rolled an ankle and been fine in the next day or two, if not in less time. Some sprains heal quickly, others' don't.

First, you are putting words in my mouth again - this is not the first time - read exactly what I wrote (see above). It was a general statement and did not directly refer to Mr. Rose. It directly referenced the time frame remaining, but I did not diagnose the man specifically.

Even so, get me a copy of his MRI and I bet it shows tendon/muscle damage as well:

Weak muscles/tendons that cross the ankle joint, especially the muscles of the lower leg that cross the outside, or lateral aspect of the ankle joint (i.e. peroneal muscles);


BTW, instead of "shredded" you have my permission to substitute "torn or partially torn":

A sprained ankle, also known as an ankle sprain, twisted ankle, rolled ankle, ankle injury or ankle ligament injury, is a common medical condition where one or more of the ligaments of the ankle is torn or partially torn.


Why would you make a "general statement" about shredded tendons and ligaments if it didn't refer to Rose?

You are once again backtracking to save face, but only make yourself seem incoherent in doing so.

It's not worth my time to debate someone who is continually reinventing his thesis.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
You know why the Bulls lost last night?

A combination of this thread and the new chatroom kept everyone out of Ike's Bulls thread, which were quite successful all year long.

DID STEVE KLINE TEACH YOU NOTHING?! WHEN YOU'VE GOT SOMETHING LIKE A HAT THAT WORKS, YOU NEVER CHANGE THE GODDAMN THING EVEN IF THE SWEAT-SALT STAINS OVERPOWER THE CARDINAL RED!

Next time Ike makes a thread you'd do well to patronize it!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Q.Bovifs wrote:
Why would I make a general statement? So I could then follow up such a broad introduction with the proper specificity, like I have.

You have veered off-topic, TM. Please read only what is printed, and ask follow-up questions to determine anything that might be on my side of the fence.

Also, please read my last edit (last 2 sentence) of my previous post - I addressed your last comment.

Let's not get disgusted and shift the debate from print to personal.

Or, you can just quit the argument altogether. Either way, I guess, is fine. I promise that won't fault you for it or carry it with me for the next time.


It is you who have veered off topic--and outside the boundaries of coherence.

Your warnings about "shifting the debate" to something "personal" are amusing given your personal accusation about my attempts to "misrepresent" your argument and your condescending evaluation about what constitutes the limits of acceptable discourse. You make no sense and only argue to satisfy your ego; you want to have the last word but have no regard for the quality of the words you utter.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
sinicalypse wrote:
You know why the Bulls lost last night?

A combination of this thread and the new chatroom kept everyone out of Ike's Bulls thread, which were quite successful all year long.

DID STEVE KLINE TEACH YOU NOTHING?! WHEN YOU'VE GOT SOMETHING LIKE A HAT THAT WORKS, YOU NEVER CHANGE THE GODDAMN THING EVEN IF THE SWEAT-SALT STAINS OVERPOWER THE CARDINAL RED!

Next time Ike makes a thread you'd do well to patronize it!

Ike needs to be on time. Ike shows up late. Bulls show up late.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
I'm still waiting for a comment from KS.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43581
Q.Bovifs wrote:
We need a hero.

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
RFDC wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
I completely agree with what Bernstein is saying. Some of those shots Atlanta knocked down could not have been defended any better.


I agree as well and that makes me feel pretty good about the rest of the series. No way they keep shooting that way.


I'll feel better if they win the next couple of games. I believe the more games they play the better they will be prepared for next series.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Panther, quick update on if youre talking about Derrick Rose or not?


Ive lost count of all the times youve gone back and forth on whether you were talking about Rose (which you clearly were)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:59 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Q.Bovifs wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
It is you who have veered off topic--and outside the boundaries of coherence.

Your warnings about "shifting the debate" to something "personal" are amusing given your personal accusation about my attempts to "misrepresent" your argument and your condescending evaluation about what constitutes the limits of acceptable discourse. You make no sense and only argue to satisfy your ego; you want to have the last word but have no regard for the quality of the words you utter.

Coherent enough for you to read and ghost-write my responses for me, I guess.

Let's settle down and "Berns" it again for a bit, though: How does any of part of your last two responses pertain to assessing the condition of Derrick Rose's ankle, or ankle sprains/tears/shreds in general for that matter?

It is you who shifted the attack.

I have made my point. Your rec league injuries and your healing experiences from such do not give you the qualifications to declare DR's injury minor. And you blatantly ignore the stark definition and published interpretation of the medical condition in question in favor of entries from "Your battlebook". It is clear, both from the simple observation of the injury and its subsequent acute exacerbation, combined with precise explanations of the likely mechanisms behind such injury and its expected heal time/prognosis, that Derrick Rose, a player who makes his hay on being explosive and elusive, will not be able to perform effectively and without showing a deficit due to this injury. I would gamble to say that the best you could possibly see him at, if he were to make it through these playoffs, would be 75%, and that (75%) is not Derrick Rose.


I ignored nothing. You changed your point when you realized it was a poor one. You lose.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawks/Bulls
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
New Topic:


When was the last time Loul Deng dunked a basketball?

discuss...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group