It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Born: Rockford Live: Aurora
pizza_Place: Lino's in Rockford
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's been a tough luck loser this year so far.


Probably not many with such a good ERA and 5 losses in baseball.

_________________
" THis poster said it's 90% that Bernstein goes national. He put a percentage on it. " - Beardown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's been a tough luck loser this year so far.


Probably not many with such a good ERA and 5 losses in baseball.


Okay, I'm sure there are older guys here who will agree with me and younger guys who will ridicule me, but I'll go on record as saying I don't believe Danks has pitched well this year at all. A pitcher's W/L record is important. It is largely a measure of how well he has pitched vs. the pitchers he has faced. Obviously, it is not as significant as it was in the era when pitchers were expected to finish games unless they were failing, but it remains significant nonetheless.

John Danks has managed to pitch as bad or worse than any starter he has faced this season. There are those who talk about "run support". To me, "run support" is nothing more than the ERA of the opposing pitchers. 0-5 is bad. There is nothing that can make it good.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I won't mock you, but I don't believe that. A pitcher controls how many runs he gives up. Nothing else.

So a pitcher in the AL with a sub 4.00 ERA is pitching well, regardless of his record.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 1135
pizza_Place: aurelios
By your logic if the sox keep hitting like they did i April Danks would have needed a sub 2 era and still would of lost
2 games..??

_________________
https://www.backroadspubandgrill.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
It looks like he is damn near going 7 ever outing and giving up around or slightly less than 3 runs per start. Those should all be considered quality starts. An elite pitcher would pitch a CG shutout and find a win here or there, but those are above average starts for the AL. I would love to have him on the North side pitching like that.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Pitchers pitch the games they're in. They number of runs allowed are relative to what is occurring in a given game. The conditions in each game are different. The weather is obvious. But hitter's background and the strikezone being called by the umpire during the game are going to affect run production. But those things shouldn't change which guy pitched better.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
An elite pitcher would pitch a CG shutout and find a win here or there


It's not necessary to pitch a complete game shutout to get a win. A game is a progression of events. There are key pitches and key at-bats in every game. How a pitcher handles those key at-bats and key pitches is the difference between an elite guy and Javy Vazquez, who has independent numbers better than many pitchers who are his superiors in real, actual baseball games.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Pitchers pitch the games they're in. They number of runs allowed are relative to what is occurring in a given game. The conditions in each game are different. The weather is obvious. But hitter's background and the strikezone being called by the umpire during the game are going to affect run production. But those things shouldn't change which guy pitched better.


So was Carlos Silva pitching well last year when he was winning but had an era in the high 5-6 range and he was only going the minimum 5 innings?

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Pitchers pitch the games they're in. They number of runs allowed are relative to what is occurring in a given game. The conditions in each game are different. The weather is obvious. But hitter's background and the strikezone being called by the umpire during the game are going to affect run production. But those things shouldn't change which guy pitched better.


So was Carlos Silva pitching well last year when he was winning but had an era in the high 5-6 range and he was only going the minimum 5 innings?


There's a lot to look at. You have to have a large enough sample. But Carlos Silva is a guy who had an okay career. He has a .500 record in 180 lifetime starts. He didn't "get lucky" 70 times. He outpitched somebody.

I know you don't think Jose DeLeon was better than Jack McDowell. I know you don't think Joel Horlen was better than Catfish Hunter. But you're using rationale that suggests you do.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:41 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
5.1 IP
6H
2 ER
4 K
1 BB
81 pitches

and a WIN my friends

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Dethklok wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
5.1 IP
6H
2 ER
4 K
1 BB
81 pitches

and a WIN my friends

I wouldn't give that line to anyone coming back from injury and making their first start 7 weeks into the season.


Check the Cueto line from the other day in his first start of the season.

6.0 innings
5H
0 ER
4K
1BB
103 pitches

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Last edited by Urlacher's missing neck on Wed May 11, 2011 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
7 base runners and 2 runs thru 5+ innings isn't exactly setting the pitching world on fire ya know.

I wonder what roster move they will make to bring Peavy back? Gotta be a pitcher hitting the DL or going back to Charlotte I would think.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
peavy: first of his 3 big league starts this year..5 i.p
3 e.r.
2 walks
2 k's
83 pitches
no decision

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
I'm not about to make any picks for Jake Peavy as he makes his regular season debut vs. the same Anaheim Angels' team he pitched against when something went terribly wrong with the back of his shoulder. If Ozzie and pitching coach Don Cooper are smart, Peavy's on a pitch limit and doesn't go more than 5 innings in his first start since last summer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I'm so happy it's Jake Peavy day. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's been a tough luck loser this year so far.


Probably not many with such a good ERA and 5 losses in baseball.


Okay, I'm sure there are older guys here who will agree with me and younger guys who will ridicule me, but I'll go on record as saying I don't believe Danks has pitched well this year at all. A pitcher's W/L record is important. It is largely a measure of how well he has pitched vs. the pitchers he has faced. Obviously, it is not as significant as it was in the era when pitchers were expected to finish games unless they were failing, but it remains significant nonetheless.

John Danks has managed to pitch as bad or worse than any starter he has faced this season. There are those who talk about "run support". To me, "run support" is nothing more than the ERA of the opposing pitchers. 0-5 is bad. There is nothing that can make it good.

Being an older sob I believe wins are so much more important than quality starts. Danks is reminding me of Jose DeLeon tuff luck pitcher that I think lost 19 games one year :!: Blaming a team for not hitting while this guy is on the bump is just ridiculous. If Danks shuts someone out
I bet he wins :shock: 4.00 ERA blows in my opinion :salut:

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
his era was much lower until yesterday..wins mean zero in my book..era and whip are better indicators.he is still the ace of that staff

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
312player wrote:
his era was much lower until yesterday..wins mean zero in my book..era and whip are better indicators.he is still the ace of that staff


If an 0-6 pitcher is the ace of your staff, you've got big fuckin' problems. What exactly are ERA and WHIP better indicators of?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
They are better indicators of how well you are pitching. A pitcher has very little control over wins.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38636
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
WHIP is a thing...one of the few stats I believe in. It's an indicator of how many guys are on base.

ERA is possibly the MOST overrated stat in baseball.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
They are better indicators of how well you are pitching. A pitcher has very little control over wins.


I wouldn't say a pitcher has "control" over anything. Except possibly his own bowel movements. He has an effect on certain things. There are things he affects more than others. But ultimately, most of those things are incidental.

Javy Vazquez is better than Carlos Zambrano in K/9, BB/9, and WHIP. Are you really going to sit here and tell me those things make him a better pitcher?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Its not the only thing I would look at to determine a pitchers worth. It's something to consider, as well as watching him pitch.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38706
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
They are better indicators of how well you are pitching. A pitcher has very little control over wins.


I wouldn't say a pitcher has "control" over anything. Except possibly his own bowel movements. He has an effect on certain things. There are things he affects more than others. But ultimately, most of those things are incidental.

Javy Vazquez is better than Carlos Zambrano in K/9, BB/9, and WHIP. Are you really going to sit here and tell me those things make him a better pitcher?

It's his penchant for bringing his best in big games that makes him better.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Its not the only thing I would look at to determine a pitchers worth. It's something to consider, as well as watching him pitch.


But "watching him pitch" is the antithesis of modern statistical analysis. By watching, you're only seeing a minute sample. And you'll remember the spectacular- be it bad or good. Juan Pierre may handle his next 200 chances flawlessly and we'll still remember the ball he dropped early this season.

The problem with statistical analysis in baseball is that it ignores- by necessity- just how critical the "when" of something is. And because such analysis has failed to find any pattern regarding the "when", the assumption is that it is random.

I don't believe that a guy like Mark Buerhle has posted the record he has because he's "gotten lucky" with double plays. It's what he does and what he has done repeatedly throughout his career. He's pitched two no-hit minimum-batter games with a relatively few strikeouts. A lot of guys who strikeout a hell of a lot more people and are more "dominating" don't even have one. Are we really to believe Buehrle is the luckiest man this side of Lou Gehrig?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
It's Jake Peavy time! I can't remember the last time my nipples were this hard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Srikeout for the Jake-meister!

And his arm hasn't fallen off yet!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38706
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Srikeout for the Jake-meister!

And his arm hasn't fallen off yet!

Dave Dravecky wrote:
Just wait

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
What's the point of AJ Piersynski?

Fuck you Pierre!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Is Peavy hurt yet? Is Pierre worse than Soriano? WTF was that?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ LAA
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I was one of Pierre's biggest supporters last year but this year he just plain sucks. Jordan Danks hit his 7th homerun in his last 11 games tonight and is said to be one if not the best defensive outfielders in the organization.

I think it might be time to get him up here and start playing him in right field and move Quentin over to left.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group