Irish Boy wrote:
I've thought for a while that the long regular season encouraged players to take games off, not because they are lazy (or, pace Scorehead, black), but because it is so damn hard on the body. So the defense stuff makes sense, especially since that's the side where players are most likely to take a little bit off.
If the NBA is going to have mammoth, randomness-free playoff schedules (which I'm not necessarily opposed to), they could probably stand to cut back on the regular season a bit. Of course that will never, ever happen, although it half the league is struggling to pay the bills maybe it's not that crazy.
Yeah, or I guess the other option is to make the playoff schedule resemble that of the regular season more/reward the same things by having games on consecutive days. There again though the financial incentives all push in the opposite direction.
I think the most pertinent example of a team purposefully deciding to take off games during the season was last year's Celtics. They pretty much packed it in for the last month and a half of the season with the expectation that their veterans would be better off in the playoffs, and ended up coming very close to winning the championship. At least in the case of the Heat, they were still competing for a top two seed during the last few weeks and stayed near the top of the conference for the entire season.