It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:39 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
And one of us cares what Bernstein thinks. About everything. To the point where his name is brought up out of nowhere.

Right, a conversation about calling callers dumb at the Score has nothing to do with Bernstein


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
You're right. I forgot Dan programmed the White Sox postgame show.

My mistake.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
You're right. I forgot Dan programmed the White Sox postgame show.

My mistake.

No, he doesnt. He just does a certain style of show that has been copied by most of the younger guys at the station.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Which was copied from The Heavy Fuel Crew.

So blame Mac.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Which was copied from The Heavy Fuel Crew.

So blame Mac.

No problem.

Didnt listen to HFC. Damn teachers frowning on AM radio during class


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
You had class til 6?

Yikes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
You had class til 6?

Yikes.

Oh afternoon show?

Mike Murphy and Mike North's voices kept me away from the SCORE for a long time

I started listening to AM radio on the 4th day of MJH. 2002, I believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Yep. Afternoon drive.

I posted about it in another thread, but the reason the Score was so popular was they had something for everyone. Meatballs were courted and given air time during Jiggetts and North while Mac and Boers would call people idiots.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Yep. Afternoon drive.

I posted about it in another thread, but the reason the Score was so popular was they had something for everyone. Meatballs were courted and given air time during Jiggetts and North while Mac and Boers would call people idiots.

Mmmm hmmm

And what was Murph's function?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
rogers park bryan wrote:
Mmmm hmmm

And what was Murph's function?

Try and attract the North Halsted crowd with his talk of soaping up in the shower with Nate Oliver.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Mac and Boers would call people idiots.


I don't think that's correct. They made everything some type of gay reference but they didn't call people idiots.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Mac and Boers would call people idiots.


I don't think that's correct. They made everything some type of burrito reference but they didn't call people idiots.

They both routinely told people to "hang up on yourself. Idiot."

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Danny Mac was definitely an angrier person back then and wasn't shy about mixing it up with callers he disagreed with but the show didn't have the 'we're smart, you're dumb you need to think like us or you're an idiot' vibe that the B&B show has.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I don't know. I'm old and watch the same Matlock episode every day because I keep forgetting the plot but as I recall it, HFC had a much more buddy at the bar argument/conversational tone to their callers.

They may have ended calls after the argument by calling them idiots on occasion but they didn't do so to try to establish themselves on some type of intellectual higher ground.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I agree with that Keyser. B&B have definitely upped the level of animosity.

I like it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Terry's Peeps wrote:
You had class til 6?

Yikes.


You have to remember your early Score. It was only on until six during the summer as they shut down at sunset.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I remember. During the winter sometimes going off the air before 5.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
Terry's Peeps wrote:
And one of us cares what Bernstein thinks. About everything. To the point where his name is brought up out of nowhere.

I am losing it. I thought that was badrogue and JORR.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Hawk and Stoney aren't doing much better, but Stone can't be a dick because it's tough to get asked to leave on both sides of town.


Just ask Neal Cotts!


Once I was at Comiskey and I saw some good looking chick in a shirt that said "I'd Neal for Cotts." Her boyfriend seemed to be pretty damn cool about the whole thing, despite people asking for pictures and the such.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Born: Rockford Live: Aurora
pizza_Place: Lino's in Rockford
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
What if the Sox had benched Dunn the game before? That late inning homer may have been the biggest hit of the game. As Rongey pointed out yesterday, he sat most of the game. We know that Dunn has the ability to hit much better than he is doing and at this point its all mental. Sitting Dunn on the bench would not help this.
rogers park bryan wrote:
And what if you sat him in one of the 30 games he's failed in a big situation?

This is silly.

I like it.


He is more likely to have a positive impact than a negative one. He can have an immediate impact and win a game for you, he is not nearly as likely to lose it for you. Its not that black or white as he will either win you the game or lose it for you. The strike outs hurt, but a big home run is going to have a larger impact than a single strikeout. If you sit him in the game, you cannot assume his replacement would automatically have hit successfully.

He has always struck out alot, however he has also been considered a very good player. This is because he has the ability to hit lots of homer runs and lots of RBIs, plus he walks alot. This didn't change because he put on a black and grey uniform.

Benching Adam Dunn is silly and yes its moronic. Sitting him on the bench during a period of mental struggling is not a good idea. His track record suggests he will start playing better. Sitting him on the bench only further delays this. He has been a disappointment, but not bench worthy. He is a veteran player, he doesn't need to be "taught a lesson". He knows he is not doing well, being punished isn't going to "give him a break", its just going to eat away at him.

I am newer here and I don't post all that often, but it appears that you let your dislike of a sports radio talkshow host play far to large of an impact on your thought process. It is moronic to sit a player that still drives in runs and hits homeruns while struggling. Who are you going to replace him with?

_________________
" THis poster said it's 90% that Bernstein goes national. He put a percentage on it. " - Beardown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 13406
Location: The Crownville Lab
pizza_Place: Langel's
sinicalypse wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Hawk and Stoney aren't doing much better, but Stone can't be a dick because it's tough to get asked to leave on both sides of town.


Just ask Neal Cotts!


Once I was at Comiskey and I saw some good looking chick in a shirt that said "I'd Neal for Cotts." Her boyfriend seemed to be pretty damn cool about the whole thing, despite people asking for pictures and the such.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
-"God is great. Beer is good. And People are crazy!"
bigfan wrote:
I am in the urination, puking, drunk, yelling zone.

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
I once jerked in a chicken truck, so I have that going for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2011 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
HossasSlavicRage the official Farmer and DJ apologist.

The fact Ranger told me they get along does not make it correct. If you have not noticed, Rangers says a few things that many here and callers might not agree with? I would not question him, as I fear his wrath and the subsequent pain he might inflict upon me in person.

Plus I have my own sources telling me it is not even close to a harmonious relationship, but 2 guys that like the job they have and want to keep it as neither guy made tons of cash during their careers. DJ made more than Farmer did and should be OK if he lived a normal life.

Even Frank, your ultimate Sox fan would agree (I think) that the broadcast portrays 2 guys that do not get along, so if they actually are friendly (which I don't believe) then this might be the worst broadcasting team ever. Additionally, for a marketing manager to allow this broadcast to continue like this is one of the great mistakes in pro sports.

However, the reason Farmer is on the air is simple. Jerry thinks he is hysterical. So, Farmer appeals to 1 guy and good for him, it's the one right guy he needs to keep a job.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2011 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Aggravated Sox Fan Bob wrote:
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
While I think Sabermetrics help fans to understand the game and are interesting, you cannot account for luck. Luck plays a huge role in baseball, easily the largest role in any sport that I have watched. Hockey come closest, but you really cannot project for that.

Now, saying something like "Adam Dunn will end up the year hitting around .250 because that is what his career numbers suggest" is totally fine, saying "This team has a 27.3 percent chance to win" is something totally different. Its much easier to account for an individual than a team of them.


Bernstein has a very short memory...Albert Belle put up some monster numbers for the White Sox for 2 seasons...AFTER THE WHITE SOX WERE SAFELY OUT OF THE RACE.....
Adam THE OAF's numbers will mean JACKSHIT if the Sox are wallowing under .500.


Bingo.

Bernsie loves Dunn because he is the prototypical SABR fanboys wet dream. Through him Bernsie can "prove" that K's don't matter, that a "kiddie" stat like BA is meaningless and on and on. But as you said AgriBob it isn't just the numbers....its when said SABR dream players actually produces those numbers. Who gives a shit if Dunn hits a bunch of homeruns if they come when the Sox are down 6-1 in the 8th or back 15 games in July or when the Sox are up 10-1 and he goes 1/5 with 4 k's and a solo shot when the Sox are up big.

It isn't quite as black and white as Bernsie likes to think it is.

And I wonder what Bernsie thinks of Mark Reynolds....is it ok that he bats .198 with 200+ K's but hits 35+ HR's?

And Bernsie hates fantasy sports so it strikes me as a bit strange when he solely worships numbers in baseball. And don't give me the crap about him saying he does the "eye" test as well....bullshit, that's a cunning ruse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2011 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Born: Rockford Live: Aurora
pizza_Place: Lino's in Rockford
bigfan wrote:
HossasSlavicRage the official Farmer and DJ apologist.

The fact Ranger told me they get along does not make it correct. If you have not noticed, Rangers says a few things that many here and callers might not agree with? I would not question him, as I fear his wrath and the subsequent pain he might inflict upon me in person.

Plus I have my own sources telling me it is not even close to a harmonious relationship, but 2 guys that like the job they have and want to keep it as neither guy made tons of cash during their careers. DJ made more than Farmer did and should be OK if he lived a normal life.

Even Frank, your ultimate Sox fan would agree (I think) that the broadcast portrays 2 guys that do not get along, so if they actually are friendly (which I don't believe) then this might be the worst broadcasting team ever. Additionally, for a marketing manager to allow this broadcast to continue like this is one of the great mistakes in pro sports.

However, the reason Farmer is on the air is simple. Jerry thinks he is hysterical. So, Farmer appeals to 1 guy and good for him, it's the one right guy he needs to keep a job.


Sorry for not believing that they "hate" each other. Like I said, they are not "best friends" but they do not "hate" each other. "Hate" means that you cannot stand to be in the same room with somebody, they both made enough money and could find another job in order to get away from somebody they hate. Like I said, its a working relationship. I think you are pushing it.

Yes, it isn't a very good broadcast, its awkward as hell. Me liking the White Sox has nothing to do with what I think about the TV or Radio broadcasts. I do however think that calling it "one of the greatest mistakes in pro sports" is also pushing it.

If that makes me an apologist than so be it.

_________________
" THis poster said it's 90% that Bernstein goes national. He put a percentage on it. " - Beardown


Last edited by HossasSlavicRage on Sun May 29, 2011 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2011 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Born: Rockford Live: Aurora
pizza_Place: Lino's in Rockford
SomeGuy wrote:
Aggravated Sox Fan Bob wrote:
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
While I think Sabermetrics help fans to understand the game and are interesting, you cannot account for luck. Luck plays a huge role in baseball, easily the largest role in any sport that I have watched. Hockey come closest, but you really cannot project for that.

Now, saying something like "Adam Dunn will end up the year hitting around .250 because that is what his career numbers suggest" is totally fine, saying "This team has a 27.3 percent chance to win" is something totally different. Its much easier to account for an individual than a team of them.


Bernstein has a very short memory...Albert Belle put up some monster numbers for the White Sox for 2 seasons...AFTER THE WHITE SOX WERE SAFELY OUT OF THE RACE.....
Adam THE OAF's numbers will mean JACKSHIT if the Sox are wallowing under .500.


Bingo.

Bernsie loves Dunn because he is the prototypical SABR fanboys wet dream. Through him Bernsie can "prove" that K's don't matter, that a "kiddie" stat like BA is meaningless and on and on. But as you said AgriBob it isn't just the numbers....its when said SABR dream players actually produces those numbers. Who gives a shit if Dunn hits a bunch of homeruns if they come when the Sox are down 6-1 in the 8th or back 15 games in July or when the Sox are up 10-1 and he goes 1/5 with 4 k's and a solo shot when the Sox are up big.

It isn't quite as black and white as Bernsie likes to think it is.

And I wonder what Bernsie thinks of Mark Reynolds....is it ok that he bats .198 with 200+ K's but hits 35+ HR's?

And Bernsie hates fantasy sports so it strikes me as a bit strange when he solely worships numbers in baseball. And don't give me the crap about him saying he does the "eye" test as well....bullshit, that's a cunning ruse.


So only sabermetrics people think Dunn has had a good career? Like I said, he has to start producing soon or its going to be a waste. I never said that he is having a good year, but he has a great track record. Most people think he is a very good hitter and has had a good career so far.

As for the rest of the stuff, okay you do not like Bernstein, he is not the only one who is surprised by Dunn's bad start. Most people were pretty pumped about the Dunn signing and thought it was a good move.

_________________
" THis poster said it's 90% that Bernstein goes national. He put a percentage on it. " - Beardown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2011 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
I will give you not HATE, but on the meter, the needle swings much more to the HATE than to the FRIENDS side.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2011 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Anyone with ears listening to a White Sox game on the radio should be able to tell that Farmer & DJ have zero chemistry & that there are a lot of comments that are followed up with a no response. Add Ranger to the mix & you have the worst pre, post. & game announcing team that I have ever heard.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:35 pm
Posts: 4896
Location: Division 1 Cook County Jail
pizza_Place: NEW YORK STYLE PEPPERONI FROM LOMBARDI'S IN MANHATTAN.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Aggravated Sox Fan Bob wrote:
Bernstein has a very short memory...Albert Belle put up some monster numbers for the White Sox for 2 seasons...AFTER THE WHITE SOX WERE SAFELY OUT OF THE RACE.....
Adam THE OAF's numbers will mean JACKSHIT if the Sox are wallowing under .500.

So a guy can't have a good season on a bad team? It means "JACKSHIT" if an MVP doesn't lead his team to the playoffs? I know that the one big goal is the win the World Series, but one guy can only do so much in baseball.

Case and point:
Image

Now, I know the Sox aren't as bad as the '87 Cubs overall were but still. Does not take away from the fact that Dawson had an awesome year.


Get Hall of Famer Andre Dawson's picture and name away from ANYTHING regarding Adam The Oaf Dunn!!!!!!!!
Put Crime Dog McGriff in a Cubs uniform up there!!!!!
My point since the day the Sox signed THE OAF, is that baseball numbers junkie Bernstein fawned all over Dunn.....and Bernstein's sabermetric visions of grandeur are bullshit.

_________________
There goes one over the fence..Tru Link Fence..Beauty, Privacy Security....Call Tru Link.
Murph's Union 76 Truck Stop....A great Thanksgiving Tradition!!!!

WOO LIFE!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:58 pm
Posts: 254
pizza_Place: egg store
Ranger interrupted a guy to tell the guy to stop talking over Ranger.

Not in third person.

I think I hate Ranger as much as I hate Hawk Harrelson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RANGER!
PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
That's crazy.

Ranger is like bowties.

Both are cool.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group