It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:07 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Watching this guy bash on Home Run Derby makes me ask again: Why the fuck did Hendry give up all that talent for Garza when Gonzalez was available? Talk about a franchise player!

Thanks alot Hendry you fucking moron.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Gonzalez signed a 7yr/$154M extension. The Cubs are not going to sign a player to that kind of money. Pujols and Fielder included.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Except for Soriano.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Garza has been a major disapointment too. Very inconsistent. The Cubs have been one big handjob this year with Hendry being the vaseline.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Right. I should have said they're not going to sign another player for that kind of money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Keyser Soze wrote:
Gonzalez signed a 7yr/$154M extension. The Cubs are not going to sign a player to that kind of money. Pujols and Fielder included.

You are probably right. Certainly can't spend money on superstar talent right Ricketts?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Keyser Soze wrote:
Gonzalez signed a 7yr/$154M extension. The Cubs are not going to sign a player to that kind of money. Pujols and Fielder included.


No player is worth that contract. That's just fucking insane.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
None of them are worth what they make. Overpaid assbags playing a game they should play for the love of it alone. It must change soon. I am not poor but I cannot afford to go see a game anymore. It sickens me that I cannot share my love of MLB with my kids. But my 1200 dollars is better spent elsewhere. That money gets me farther at an amusement park or taking little trips close to home than a 2 1/2 hr baseball game to support arrogant jerk offs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
There are actually rumors that the Sawx are interested in Garza.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 6:09 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79434
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Yeah, Hak Ju Lee was going to get you Gonzalez.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, Hak Ju Lee was going to get you Gonzalez.

They were gushing over him in the futures game. I wonder how he will hit in the majors?


Scooter, 1200$?

Do you have 9 kids?


I know its not cheap but it shouldnt be more than 60$ a person tops and thats allowing for like 20$ for food etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, Hak Ju Lee was going to get you Gonzalez.


Right. Just crazy fantasy GM'ing

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:33 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, Hak Ju Lee was going to get you Gonzalez.

It was widely rumored that Gordon Beckham, among other prospects, could have...

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, Hak Ju Lee was going to get you Gonzalez.

It was widely rumored that Gordon Beckham, among other prospects, could have...

:lol:

Its funny...becuase its true.


A Beckham for Fielder trade was also a rumor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
cpguy wrote:
Watching this guy bash on Home Run Derby makes me ask again: Why the fuck did Hendry give up all that talent for Garza when Gonzalez was available? Talk about a franchise player!

Thanks alot Hendry you fucking moron.


I am little sick of seeing/hearing people that want these big money players for the Cubs. These are the same folks that are mad at Hendry for signing Soriano and extending Zambrano. When he signed Soriano, he was a 40/40 player. You either want the Cubs to act like the Yankees and waste money or you want a team that builds from within and adds veterans only to plug a hole or two. Pujols is too old to give the number of years and money that will be required, and Prince is risky with his weight and poor defense. As for A Gonz, way too much money for one guy. The Cubs are probably 5 solid players away from being competitive (90 wins plus), so why blow a lot of money on one guy?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
denisdman wrote:
cpguy wrote:
Watching this guy bash on Home Run Derby makes me ask again: Why the fuck did Hendry give up all that talent for Garza when Gonzalez was available? Talk about a franchise player!

Thanks alot Hendry you fucking moron.


I am little sick of seeing/hearing people that want these big money players for the Cubs. These are the same folks that are mad at Hendry for signing Soriano and extending Zambrano. When he signed Soriano, he was a 40/40 player. You either want the Cubs to act like the Yankees and waste money or you want a team that builds from within and adds veterans only to plug a hole or two. Pujols is too old to give the number of years and money that will be required, and Prince is risky with his weight and poor defense. As for A Gonz, way too much money for one guy. The Cubs are probably 5 solid players away from being competitive (90 wins plus), so why blow a lot of money on one guy?

What kind of money is Garza going to command in 2 years when he is a free agent? At minimum, 60M for 5 yrs. Gonz is not some 'roid freak or shit defensive player like Soriano. He is probably the top hitter in MLB right now and has the power stats as well. And they have no 1B in the system worth a shit so they give Pena 10M instead. Great plan there!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
cpguy wrote:
denisdman wrote:
cpguy wrote:
Watching this guy bash on Home Run Derby makes me ask again: Why the fuck did Hendry give up all that talent for Garza when Gonzalez was available? Talk about a franchise player!

Thanks alot Hendry you fucking moron.


I am little sick of seeing/hearing people that want these big money players for the Cubs. These are the same folks that are mad at Hendry for signing Soriano and extending Zambrano. When he signed Soriano, he was a 40/40 player. You either want the Cubs to act like the Yankees and waste money or you want a team that builds from within and adds veterans only to plug a hole or two. Pujols is too old to give the number of years and money that will be required, and Prince is risky with his weight and poor defense. As for A Gonz, way too much money for one guy. The Cubs are probably 5 solid players away from being competitive (90 wins plus), so why blow a lot of money on one guy?

What kind of money is Garza going to command in 2 years when he is a free agent? At minimum, 60M for 5 yrs. Gonz is not some 'roid freak or shit defensive player like Soriano. He is probably the top hitter in MLB right now and has the power stats as well. And they have no 1B in the system worth a shit so they give Pena 10M instead. Great plan there!


But with A Gonz, you are stuck with the contract. With Garza, you don't have to sign him if that is the cost. So your choice is locking in a known expensive contract vs. a guy you don't have to pay, and that's a big difference. The fact that the Cubs gave up a lot to get Garza is irrelevant because that is a sunk cost.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:19 am
Posts: 13
pizza_Place: Wherever you're buying.
I'm not terribly interested in defending Hendry, but why would you assume that he *chose* to go after Garza instead of Gonzalez? Isn't it possible that the Cubs tried very hard to get Gonzalez, but the Padres preferred the Sox's offer? And then - a month later - the Cubs added Garza?

_________________
Chicago Cubs Rumors and News


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
AceCubbie wrote:
I'm not terribly interested in defending Hendry, but why would you assume that he *chose* to go after Garza instead of Gonzalez? Isn't it possible that the Cubs tried very hard to get Gonzalez, but the Padres preferred the Sox's offer? And then - a month later - the Cubs added Garza?

Hendry expressed zero interest in Gonzalez. None. They they give up 4 quality prospects for Garza.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:19 am
Posts: 13
pizza_Place: Wherever you're buying.
cpguy wrote:
AceCubbie wrote:
I'm not terribly interested in defending Hendry, but why would you assume that he *chose* to go after Garza instead of Gonzalez? Isn't it possible that the Cubs tried very hard to get Gonzalez, but the Padres preferred the Sox's offer? And then - a month later - the Cubs added Garza?

Hendry expressed zero interest in Gonzalez. None. They they give up 4 quality prospects for Garza.


I think you are mistaken on that. And I'm not sure how any of us could know for sure.

_________________
Chicago Cubs Rumors and News


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
cpguy wrote:
Hendry expressed zero interest in Gonzalez. None. They they give up 4 quality prospects for Garza.



Four? Your counting 2 of Fuld, Chironos and Guyer as quality? And how exactly do you know the amount of interest Hendry had in Gonzalez?

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2 ... 2410_1.php

Ken Rosenthal disagrees with you there.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
denisdman wrote:
cpguy wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Watching this guy bash on Home Run Derby makes me ask again: Why the fuck did Hendry give up all that talent for Garza when Gonzalez was available? Talk about a franchise player!

Thanks alot Hendry you fucking moron.


I am little sick of seeing/hearing people that want these big money players for the Cubs. These are the same folks that are mad at Hendry for signing Soriano and extending Zambrano. When he signed Soriano, he was a 40/40 player. You either want the Cubs to act like the Yankees and waste money or you want a team that builds from within and adds veterans only to plug a hole or two. Pujols is too old to give the number of years and money that will be required, and Prince is risky with his weight and poor defense. As for A Gonz, way too much money for one guy. The Cubs are probably 5 solid players away from being competitive (90 wins plus), so why blow a lot of money on one guy?

What kind of money is Garza going to command in 2 years when he is a free agent? At minimum, 60M for 5 yrs. Gonz is not some 'roid freak or shit defensive player like Soriano. He is probably the top hitter in MLB right now and has the power stats as well. And they have no 1B in the system worth a shit so they give Pena 10M instead. Great plan there!


But with A Gonz, you are stuck with the contract. With Garza, you don't have to sign him if that is the cost. So your choice is locking in a known expensive contract vs. a guy you don't have to pay, and that's a big difference. The fact that the Cubs gave up a lot to get Garza is irrelevant because that is a sunk cost.[/quote]

So instead of a franchise player, you have a guy you may lose as a free agent and get 1 draft pick back? Or you trade him and maybe get back 1 or 2 decent prospects after giving up 4?

The brilliance of Jim Hendry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Northside_Dan wrote:
cpguy wrote:
Hendry expressed zero interest in Gonzalez. None. They they give up 4 quality prospects for Garza.



Four? Your counting 2 of Fuld, Chironos and Guyer as quality? And how exactly do you know the amount of interest Hendry had in Gonzalez?

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2 ... 2410_1.php

Ken Rosenthal disagrees with you there.


Kinda gets back to my original point. San Diego didn't really get all that much from Boston compared to what the Cubs gave up for Garza. Why couldn't Hendry get a deal done??

Because he is a shit GM.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
AceCubbie wrote:
cpguy wrote:
AceCubbie wrote:
I'm not terribly interested in defending Hendry, but why would you assume that he *chose* to go after Garza instead of Gonzalez? Isn't it possible that the Cubs tried very hard to get Gonzalez, but the Padres preferred the Sox's offer? And then - a month later - the Cubs added Garza?

Hendry expressed zero interest in Gonzalez. None. They they give up 4 quality prospects for Garza.


I think you are mistaken on that. And I'm not sure how any of us could know for sure.

The Garza rumors were persistent, but never was it reported the Cubs were close to landing A Gonz. It was always Boston. And sure enough...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Here's what they got:

Home /Sports /Baseball /Red Sox Dan Shaughnessy
Gonzo is just out of this world
By Dan Shaughnessy
Globe Columnist / July 12, 2011
E-mail this article To: Invalid E-mail address Add a personal message:(80 character limit) Your E-mail: Invalid E-mail address Sending your articleYour article has been sent.
E-mail|Print|Reprints|Text size – + PHOENIX - Adrian Gonzalez might be the best player in baseball today.
Tweet 6 people Tweeted this.ShareThis .RelatedPhoto Gallery Home Run DerbyHard work makes Beckett a Star in a fixed position Dan Shaughnessy Gonzo is just out of this world On baseball Right now, future for Ortiz is bright All-Star notebook Cano edges Gonzalez in Derby Jury selection in Clemens trial a slow process Video Lester, Youkilis on their All-Star selections Globe 10.0 Is the HR derby a sporting event? Video Shaughnessy on the Red Sox in the second half More Red Sox coverage Next Red Sox GameFri, Jul 15, 7:10 p.m.Boston Red Sox@Tampa Bay Rays Matchup HistoryJun 16 2011 W 4-2 View
Jun 15 2011 W 3-0 View
Jun 14 2011 L 4-0 View
Apr 12 2011 L 3-2 View
Apr 11 2011 L 16-5 View
Sep 8 2010 W 11-5 View
Sep 7 2010 L 14-5 View
Sep 6 2010 W 12-5 View
All matchups
Think about it. Whom would you take ahead of him? At the break, Gonzo is leading the majors in batting average (.354, tied with Jose Reyes), RBIs (77), hits (128), doubles (29), and total bases (214). He’s playing Gold Glove-caliber first base and he’s the No. 3 hitter on the team with the best record in the American League.

Gonzalez will be batting third tonight when the American League faces Roy Halladay at enclosed Chase Field. He was runner-up in last night’s Home Run Derby.

“We expected him to be good after what we gave up for him [top prospects Anthony Rizzo and Casey Kelly],’’ said the Red Sox’ Josh Beckett. “But I don’t think anyone expected this. Not even our guys.’’

Tim Lincecum of the Giants is happy to have Gonzalez out of the National League West.

“It was tough because we did see him so often,’’ said the ace of the world champions. “The advantage was that we didn’t have to face him at Fenway Park. We played him at Petco and at our park. Now being in Boston with that wall, he’s able to utilize it and it plays to his strength. I always knew he was a really good player. Everybody knew it.

“He’s got that beautiful stroke to hit the ball to the other field, like John Olerud did. He doesn’t try to do too much with it. He’s just a natural hitter.’’

Gonzalez is hitting more than 60 points higher than his career average.

“I bet he’s a lot better than you thought he was,’’ said Gonzalez’s former teammate, Padres closer Heath Bell. “When you look at that career average, you have to consider the ballpark and the fact that he had no one hitting around him. He got the 100 RBIs and hit the 30-40 home runs with no protection whatsoever.

“As pitchers, we always said, ‘Why would you pitch to him? Just walk him four times.’ He’s like Barry Bonds. He was the only guy who was going to hurt you in our lineup the last couple of years. We had a couple of guys that were good hitters, but nobody who was gonna hurt you, guys who would hit a double or get on base. We knew he was amazing. Now he’s got people around him.’’

Asked to explain the jump in his production Gonzalez said, “just look at my walks.’’

Yo Adrian led the National League with 119 walks in 2009. Last year he walked 93 times. In the first half of this season he’s got 35 walks. It’s simple. There’s no place to hide when you throw against the Red Sox. Pitchers have to deal with him now.

“I don’t know why anybody would give him anything now, even with the players around him,’’ said the Cardinals’ Lance Berkman. “He has that beautiful swing. Put that kind of talent around him and in a ballpark that is tailor-made for that approach . . .

“I don’t know that anybody in baseball is really surprised that he is doing what he’s doing. He’s off the plate with a long bat and he waits a long time and wears that left-field wall out. That’s why he’s a good hitter, because he sees the ball a long time and has the ability to hit an inside pitch on a line the other way. That’s tough to do.’’

“You’ve got to go up there with a game plan,’’ said Gonzalez. “When you’ve got runners on the bases, you just put the ball in play. Don’t worry about the home run. With nobody on base, you drive the ball more, put yourself in scoring position or hit the home run. If I’ve got runners on base, I just try to hit behind the ball. If the pitch is away, you go away. If it’s in, you look in and maybe pull it.’’

Gonzalez is low-key, almost intentionally bland. Spanish-speaking reporters have tried to get him to comment on Arizona’s controversial immigration law. Gonzalez, a Mexican-American, won’t comment. In any language.

Bell misses Gonzo in the Padres clubhouse.

“He was a good teammate,’’ said the closer. “He didn’t talk to the pitchers that much, but he was always talking to the hitters. His locker was only a few down from mine. One time he brought a foot massager and he let everybody use it. He was always having a good time and letting everybody use all of his stuff. When soccer was big the Mexican flag would pop up. We had mariachi bands playing occasionally. I don’t know if you’re going to get that in Boston.’’

The Red Sox have a fine legacy of lefty sluggers coming up big in All-Star Games. Ted Williams hit a three-run walkoff to beat the National League in Detroit in the magical season of 1941. In ’46 at Fenway, Ted went 4 for 4 with two homers, including a blast off Rip Sewell’s eephus pitch. Carl Yastrzemski hit a homer off Tom Seaver in Milwaukee in 1975 and Fred Lynn homered at the Kingdome in ’79. Wade Boggs went deep in Anaheim in 1989.

You could win a lot of money in a bar tonight with the knowledge that the last All-Star home run was hit by . . . J.D. Drew in Yankee Stadium in 2008.

Gonzo’s turn tonight.

Dan Shaughnessy is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at dshaughnessy@globe.com.


We got Garza: 4-7 with a 4.26 ERA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
cpguy wrote:


We got Garza: 4-7 with a 4.26 ERA.



It's not that easy. You think Fielder will sign for 18m a year and you think that we would have gotten Gonzalez for same prospect package that got Garza. With what money would be extend Gonzalez with? We don't have any. Obviously I rather have him than Garza if money were no object, but unfortunately it is. Couple that with the fact that this team is 5-6 players away from competing, having Gonzalez with an extension wouldn't affect our championship trajectory.

I realize the reason we couldn't pay him is because of Hendry's bad contracts, but unfortunately there's nothing that can be done about them.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Northside_Dan wrote:
cpguy wrote:


We got Garza: 4-7 with a 4.26 ERA.



It's not that easy. You think Fielder will sign for 18m a year and you think that we would have gotten Gonzalez for same prospect package that got Garza. With what money would be extend Gonzalez with? We don't have any. Obviously I rather have him than Garza if money were no object, but unfortunately it is. Couple that with the fact that this team is 5-6 players away from competing, having Gonzalez with an extension wouldn't affect our championship trajectory.

I realize the reason we couldn't pay him is because of Hendry's bad contracts, but unfortunately there's nothing that can be done about them.


Gonz is earning less than Pena this year. The extension would have kicked in next year when 50M+ is off the books.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
cpguy wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
cpguy wrote:
Hendry expressed zero interest in Gonzalez. None. They they give up 4 quality prospects for Garza.



Four? Your counting 2 of Fuld, Chironos and Guyer as quality? And how exactly do you know the amount of interest Hendry had in Gonzalez?

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2 ... 2410_1.php

Ken Rosenthal disagrees with you there.


Kinda gets back to my original point. San Diego didn't really get all that much from Boston compared to what the Cubs gave up for Garza. Why couldn't Hendry get a deal done??

Because he is a shit GM.

You couldn't be more wrong. Kelly, Rizzo and Fuentes are monsters and all three are better than anyone the Cubs gave up for Garza. To equal that deal the Cubs would have had to trade Brett Jackson and Trey McNutt along with Archer and another player AND sign Gonzalez to a monster contract. Boston is in a position to make a deal like that and the Cubs are not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
cpguy wrote:

Gonz is earning less than Pena this year. The extension would have kicked in next year when 50M+ is off the books.


Right, but then you sink 22m into him and still have gaping holes in LF, RF, 3B and moderate holes in CF, Starting rotation etc.

Not worth it.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Keyser Soze wrote:
cpguy wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:

Hendry expressed zero interest in Gonzalez. None. They they give up 4 quality prospects for Garza.



Four? Your counting 2 of Fuld, Chironos and Guyer as quality? And how exactly do you know the amount of interest Hendry had in Gonzalez?

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2 ... 2410_1.php

Ken Rosenthal disagrees with you there.


Kinda gets back to my original point. San Diego didn't really get all that much from Boston compared to what the Cubs gave up for Garza. Why couldn't Hendry get a deal done??

Because he is a shit GM.

You couldn't be more wrong. Kelly, Rizzo and Fuentes are monsters and all three are better than anyone the Cubs gave up for Garza. To equal that deal the Cubs would have had to trade Brett Jackson and Trey McNutt along with Archer and another player AND sign Gonzalez to a monster contract. Boston is in a position to make a deal like that and the Cubs are not.[/quote]
Archer and McNutt aren't doing shit. So Jackson for Gonz? Gotta do that right?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group