It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:57 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Cowley is on with Spiegs and some hilljack saying the Marlins are the front runners.


I think Ozzie and Reyes could influence him if the money is close. That would be the reverse of what the Marlins normally do. They would have 3 of the top 5 to 10 players when healthy.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
spanky wrote:
Now being reported that the Cubs made a similar offer to Prince (less years in return for more $$$).


Where'd you see this? Missed it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Bucky Chris wrote:
spanky wrote:
Now being reported that the Cubs made a similar offer to Prince (less years in return for more $$$).


Where'd you see this? Missed it.

@Ken_Rosenthal
Sources: #Cubs' interest in Fielder is on shorter deal, not eight or nine years. Would pay high dollars in exchange for shorter term. #MLB


(When you read this tweet, take long pauses after every couple of words)

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I can see Prince accepting a deal like that at his age. He'll get another bite at the donut.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
spanky wrote:
@Ken_Rosenthal
Sources: #Cubs' interest in Fielder is on shorter deal, not eight or nine years. Would pay high dollars in exchange for shorter term. #MLB

(When you read this tweet, take long pauses after every couple of words)

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Albert Pujols may not be a Miami Marlin by the time he wakes up Wednesday morning. But the team expects a resolution to its bid to sign Pujols, one way or the other, in the next few hours, sources told ESPN.com Tuesday night.

The Marlins have pressed Pujols and his agent, Dan Lozano, for an answer on their latest 10-year offer, sources said. Meanwhile, Lozano was continuing to talk with the Cardinals, who have an offer of their own on the table.

Baseball sources told ESPN the Magazine's Buster Olney earlier Tuesday the Marlins made a 10-year offer to Pujols, though it is unclear what the monetary figure of the offer is. Another key question is whether the Marlins would agree to include a no-trade clause in their offer. The club did not offer shortstop Jose Reyes such a clause, which Pujols had with the St. Louis Cardinals.

The Marlins' latest offer is an increase from the nine-year proposal made in their first meeting with Lozano.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Cubs spoke to Lozano on Monday and made a qualifying offer to Pujols, according to reports.

Lozano has met with the Marlins and Cardinals multiple times in the last two days. And the Cubs' reported offer is believed to be for significantly fewer years and dollars.


The Marlins have approached Pujols much like the way they aggressively pursued Reyes over the weekend in an attempt either to sign the 32-year-old first baseman or move on. Sources said they were trying to determine, once and for all, whether Pujols had serious interest in playing in Miami, or whether he was using the Marlins' offer to increase pressure on the Cardinals to up their own offer.

If the Marlins do get Pujols to agree, they would look to trade first baseman Gaby Sanchez for a starting pitcher. If talks break down with Pujols, they would turn their attention to the free agent starting pitching market. They've spoken extensively with the agents for both Mark Buehrle and C.J. Wilson, and brought both to Florida for tours of their new ballpark.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I guess Theo is trying to do what Hendry did early on. Going out of his way to lose or finish 2nd so he can say he tried.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
Seems to be a new bidder in Pujols sweepstakes. Ken Rosenthal tweeted the Angels are now pursuing him.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Marlins are out. Would love to see Pujols in Chicago. Preferable with the Cubs. Even though I think it would make more sense for the Sox to go after him. Even after he couldn't play the field he would still be able to swing a bat.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
HOVA wrote:
Marlins are out. Would love to see Pujols in Chicago. Preferable with the Cubs. Even though I think it would make more sense for the Sox to go after him. Even after he couldn't play the field he would still be able to swing a bat.


:?:

Their 3 DH's and Konerko aren't enough?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Cowley is on with Spiegs and some hilljack saying the Marlins are the front runners.


Shocked that Cowley had that wrong.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79447
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
HOVA wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Here's the thing. Prior to the steroid era precious few guys have been good into their late thirties. Hank Aaron is a notable exception that comes to mind. Mickey Mantle was pretty much finished at about 33. Whatever guys were doing from about 1993-2008 has made it easy to forget that 35 is old for a ballplayer.


Ruth was good too. It happens. As long as he decline isn't dramatic he's worth it. Jeter and A-Rod are still playing at fairly high levels and they're on the wrong side of 35.



Ruth dropped off precipitously at about 37 and I think he was out of baseball at 40. And Jeter and A-Rod are in steep decline. I'm not sure Rodriguez played more than about 100 games last year.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group