It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:39 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/9425426-419/don-cooper-rubbed-sox-wrong-way-jake-peavy-in-particular.html

a handful of Sox pitchers who felt betrayed by the way pitching coach Don Cooper conducted business last season.

“He was in survival mode for the first five months, and then all of a sudden when he got his contract [extension], he was back to ‘good ol’ Coop,’ ’’ one pitcher said recently. “They preach to us to act a certain way in a contract year, and you have a coach who couldn’t even lead by example. That rubbed a lot of us the wrong way.

“He treated a lot of us differently before that.’’

“That’s exactly right,’’ Danks said. “Things need to be fixed. I’m easygoing, I didn’t have anything with anyone, but I know Jake and Coop need to both sit down and get on the same page.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
If forced between choosing sides between Jake Peavy and Don Cooper, I'll drink cyanide.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Only in HOOTERVILLE (thanks Bob) would a pitching coach be such a firestorm. At what point is the hassle not worth it anymore?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Peoria Matt wrote:
Only in HOOTERVILLE (thanks Bob) would a pitching coach be such a firestorm. At what point is the hassle not worth it anymore?


When they start pitching like the Cubs. :P

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:41 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I KNEW bigfan would have a thread started about this.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Jake Peavy? Really?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Didn't Cooper cover Peavy's ass for pretty much the entire season?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Only in HOOTERVILLE (thanks Bob) would a pitching coach be such a firestorm. At what point is the hassle not worth it anymore?


When they start pitching like the Cubs. :P

White Sox pitching as a whole has been average under Coop


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
White Sox pitching as a whole has been average under Coop


I'm pretty sure that isn't really the case by whatever objective measure you want to use.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
White Sox pitching as a whole has been average under Coop


I'm pretty sure that isn't really the case by whatever objective measure you want to use.

White Sox MLB ranking in defensive independent ERA under cooper

02: 12th
03: 12th
04: 17th
05: 2nd
06: 22nd
07: 24th
08: 16th
09: 7th
10: 25th
11: 30th (last)



Average ranking: 16.7


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
White Sox pitching as a whole has been average under Coop


I'm pretty sure that isn't really the case by whatever objective measure you want to use.

White Sox MLB ranking in defensive independent ERA under cooper

02: 12th
03: 12th
04: 17th
05: 2nd
06: 22nd
07: 24th
08: 16th
09: 7th
10: 25th
11: 30th (last)



Average ranking: 16.7


:lol: Defense independent ERA???? You've got to do better than that.

That's the thing about stats. They can be spun anyway anyone wants. I suppose DIPS is attempting (and failing, I would suggest) to address only those things a pitcher can "control". There are so many holes in this thought process I could author a Sinicalyptic treatise. But you already know that, so there isn't any need for me to do so.

Let's look at things Cooper might have some control over. (Obviously the talent level of his charges isn't one of those things.) For example, how do the Sox stack up in pitcher's days on the disabled list during Cooper's tenure?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 315
Location: Southside of Chicago
pizza_Place: Italian Fiesta
:roll: Image


Image

_________________
If you don't judge my do-rag, I won't judge your red flag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I put zero faith in any stat created by a McCracken.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm pretty sure that isn't really the case by whatever objective measure you want to use.

White Sox MLB ranking in defensive independent ERA under cooper

02: 12th
03: 12th
04: 17th
05: 2nd
06: 22nd
07: 24th
08: 16th
09: 7th
10: 25th
11: 30th (last)



Average ranking: 16.7


:lol: Defense independent ERA???? You've got to do better than that.

That's the thing about stats. They can be spun anyway anyone wants. I suppose DIPS is attempting (and failing, I would suggest) to address only those things a pitcher can "control". There are so many holes in this thought process I could author a Sinicalyptic treatise. But you already know that, so there isn't any need for me to do so.

Let's look at things Cooper might have some control over. (Obviously the talent level of his charges isn't one of those things.) For example, how do the Sox stack up in pitcher's days on the disabled list during Cooper's tenure?

What are you talking about?

You asked for an objective measurement. Would you prefer Good Ol' ERA?

Because the results are largely the same.


What would you use? And please get DAYS on the DL shit outta here. Way too many variables there to credit the pitching coach.


Are you saying TEAM ERA is not a good way to judge a pitching cocah?

and if so, what would you use?


Also, let's remember my statement was "White Sox pitching under Coop"

rogers park bryan wrote:
White Sox pitching as a whole has been average under Coop



You really think the White Sox have been especially good in the pitching department since 02?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
$5000 Suit wrote:
LAME PICTURE REFERENCE TO ONE SEASON 6 YEARS AGO AS IF IT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH WHAT WE ARE DISCUSSING

Weak


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
What are you talking about?

You asked for an objective measurement. Would you prefer Good Ol' ERA?

Because the results are largely the same.


What would you use? And please get DAYS on the DL shit outta here. Way too many variables there to credit the pitching coach.


Are you saying TEAM ERA is not a good way to judge a pitching cocah?

and if so, what would you use?


Well, first of all, I don't think days on the DL has anymore variables than any other statistic. The fact is the White Sox pitchers have been healthy over the course of ten seasons under Don Cooper to such a degree that it defies luck.

Anyway, why would ERA (the old-fashioned type you sneer at or your obviously favored defense independent type) be a proper analytic to use when some teams play half their games in parks that are radically more hitter-freindly than others?

I would look at things like starter's workloads, bullpen effectiveness, etc.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
You really think the White Sox have been especially good in the pitching department since 02?


Certainly better than average.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
What are you talking about?

You asked for an objective measurement. Would you prefer Good Ol' ERA?

Because the results are largely the same.


What would you use? And please get DAYS on the DL shit outta here. Way too many variables there to credit the pitching coach.


Are you saying TEAM ERA is not a good way to judge a pitching cocah?

and if so, what would you use?


Well, first of all, I don't think days on the DL has anymore variables than any other statistic. The fact is the White Sox pitchers have been healthy over the course of ten seasons under Don Cooper to such a degree that it defies luck.

A pitcher's personal habits, body type, innings on the arm, maturity (farnsworth), IQ (Remlinger) all play a role.

Is it Cooper's fault Jake Peavy is a little bitch?

Absolutely not.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Anyway, why would ERA (the old-fashioned type you sneer at or your obviously favored defense independent type) be a proper analytic to use when some teams play half their games in parks that are radically more hitter-freindly than others?

That is why I used DIPS.


Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I would look at things like starter's workloads, bullpen effectiveness, etc.

More variables here. Guillen left Garland in, Manuel took him out. You're gonna give and take credit away from Cooper for that?



So you have no real numbers? You just think he's good and guess that certain extremely sketchy stats MAY show that?


DIPS is a good way to judge team pitching.

According to the numbers....

White Sox pitching has been largely average under Coop.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 315
Location: Southside of Chicago
pizza_Place: Italian Fiesta
$5000 Suit wrote:
LAME PICTURE REFERENCE TO ONE SEASON 6 YEARS AGO AS IF IT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH WHAT WE ARE DISCUSSING

Weak[/quote]
Weak is Cub fans obsession with the Sox. Last time I checked 6<103.

_________________
If you don't judge my do-rag, I won't judge your red flag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You really think the White Sox have been especially good in the pitching department since 02?


Certainly better than average.

Not according to the numbers.

According to the numbers they are a little below average.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
For example, how do the Sox stack up in pitcher's days on the disabled list during Cooper's tenure?

Answer- not very many.

And if you take away Peavy and a freak line drive off the head of Humber, it would be miniscule compared to all other MLB teams.

I agree with Orr, overall they have been better than just average for the most part under Cooper. In '07 the bullpen was awful and I would say that is more on Kenny. This year the pitching was pretty bad at times. In 2006 they were not very good, but they also scored a ton of runs and were able to win games 12-8, 10-6, etc. Doesn't help the ol' ERA much but still can rack up the W's.

Also, its pretty clear that Ozzie did a lot of dumb things with the bullpen which further skewed the ERA over most of Cooper's time.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
$5000 Suit wrote:
$5000 Suit wrote:
LAME PICTURE REFERENCE TO ONE SEASON 6 YEARS AGO AS IF IT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH WHAT WE ARE DISCUSSING

Weak

Weak is Cub fans obsession with the Sox. Last time I checked 6<103.[/quote]
Congrats. The White Sox having a better recent history of WS than the Cubs has nothing to do with what we are talking about.

Weak troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
For example, how do the Sox stack up in pitcher's days on the disabled list during Cooper's tenure?

Answer- not very many.

And if you take away Peavy and a freak line drive off the head of Humber, it would be miniscule compared to all other MLB teams.

:lol:

Yeah if you just take away all the injuries they've been very healthy


Frank Coztansa wrote:
[I agree with Orr, overall they have been better than just average for the most part under Cooper. In '07 the bullpen was awful and I would say that is more on Kenny. This year the pitching was pretty bad at times. In 2006 they were not very good, but they also scored a ton of runs and were able to win games 12-8, 10-6, etc. Doesn't help the ol' ERA much but still can rack up the W's.

Also, its pretty clear that Ozzie did a lot of dumb things with the bullpen which further skewed the ERA over most of Cooper's time.


None of that changes my statement

White Sox pitching under Coop has been largely average.


Maybe they suck and Coop's magic wand made them average but either way the numbers show what they show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 315
Location: Southside of Chicago
pizza_Place: Italian Fiesta
Weak trolling is that half the threads in this section are started by Cub fans and every single one is slanted. It's all the same thing: Kenny sucks, JR sucks, Coop sucks, Farm system sucks, Hawks annoying, etc. There is no objective analysis or debate. Just the same ol' well my team has sucked forever so let me shit on yours.

_________________
If you don't judge my do-rag, I won't judge your red flag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
For example, how do the Sox stack up in pitcher's days on the disabled list during Cooper's tenure?

Answer- not very many.

And if you take away Peavy and a freak line drive off the head of Humber, it would be miniscule compared to all other MLB teams.

:lol:

Yeah if you just take away all the injuries they've been very healthy

Peavy, who was hurt when they got him is the big one. Other than that, you will not find very many DL stints by a Sox pitcher in the last 8-10 years. Look it up. Very very very few compared to other teams.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:47 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/artic ... leid=12248

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
$5000 Suit wrote:
Weak trolling is that half the threads in this section are started by Cub fans and every single one is slanted. It's all the same thing: Kenny sucks, JR sucks, Coop sucks, Farm system sucks, Hawks annoying, etc. There is no objective analysis or debate. Just the same ol' well my team has sucked forever so let me shit on yours.

Well than you need to go into those threads.

Right now we are currently discussing, exchanging, and debating the merits of the actual numbers

Pretty much the textbook definition of "Objective analysis"


Weak.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Peavy, who was hurt when they got him is the big one. Other than that, you will not find very many DL stints by a Sox pitcher in the last 8-10 years. Look it up. Very very very few compared to other teams.

Im sure that's true since you and JORR are hanging Coop's hat on it.

I just think the wording was off.

You cant take away injuries. A lot of them are of the "freak" variety...like ALL women


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 315
Location: Southside of Chicago
pizza_Place: Italian Fiesta
rogers park bryan wrote:
$5000 Suit wrote:
Weak trolling is that half the threads in this section are started by Cub fans and every single one is slanted. It's all the same thing: Kenny sucks, JR sucks, Coop sucks, Farm system sucks, Hawks annoying, etc. There is no objective analysis or debate. Just the same ol' well my team has sucked forever so let me shit on yours.

Well than you need to go into those threads.

Right now we are currently discussing, exchanging, and debating the merits of the actual numbers

Pretty much the textbook definition of "Objective analysis"


Weak.

It wasn't directed at you, just the one big Cub(sox) fan who does the opposite of what you are doing.

_________________
If you don't judge my do-rag, I won't judge your red flag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cowley on Coop
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=12248

Of course, it’s difficult to apportion credit here. We can’t say, with any degree of certainty, that the White Sox have learned how to prevent pitching injuries; perhaps they’ve simply learned to avert them, by identifying the pitchers most likely to suffer them and then avoiding those marked men like the plague. Still, either achievement would represent a significant addition to the sum of baseball knowledge, and could help to explain why the White Sox have occasionally constituted a blind spot for PECOTA.

However, even if the White Sox have cracked a crucial sequence of the pitching injury code, we might not want to christen Cooper the league’s Most Valuable Pitching Coach just yet. Check out how the team’s non-pitchers have done in the injury department:






Coop is good at keeping them healthy and White sox pitching has been largely average under him.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group