It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
I would imagine that the success rate for drafting WR's is about the same as it is for other positions. Not every draft pick is going to end up a star, but you have a much better chance of drafting successful future NFL players if you draft pretty close to the chalk & pick players from major college programs, rather than what the Bears have done drafting players from schools that most other teams aren't even looking at, & being contrarian.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
rogers park bryan wrote:
The linemen list wouldnt be any better.


It looks significantly better to me. Here by order with years as primary starter -

Code:
2008   1   Jake Long   3
2009   2   Jason Smith   1
2001   2   Leonard Davis   10
2004   2   Robert Gallery   6
2000   3   Chris Samuels   9
2007   3   Joe Thomas   4
2006   4   D'Brickashaw Ferguson   5
2002   4   Mike D. Williams   4
2010   4   Trent Williams   1
2007   5   Levi Brown   4
2009   6   Andre Smith   0
2010   6   Russell Okung   1
2002   7   Bryant McKinnie   9
2009   8   Eugene Monroe   2
2003   8   Jordan Gross   8
2002   10   Levi Jones   7
2010   11   Anthony Davis   1
2008   12   Ryan Clady   3
2005   13   Jammal Brown   5
2008   14   Chris Williams   2
2001   14   Kenyatta Walker   5
2008   17   Gosder Cherilus   3
2001   18   Jeff Backus   10
2005   19   Alex Barron   5
2008   19   Jeff Otah   2
2004   19   Vernon Carey   6
2003   20   George Foster   4
2000   20   Stockar McDougle   3
2008   21   Sam Baker   2
2000   22   Chris McIntosh   1
2010   23   Bryan Bulaga   1
2009   23   Michael Oher   2
2008   26   Duane Brown   3
2003   26   Kwame Harris   3
2007   28   Joe Staley   4
2002   29   Marc Colombo   5

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
rogers park bryan wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
.

The bigger point is, if you are worried about the future, the last thing you want in the 1st round is a WR. Those are the final pieces of the puzzle. You want LBs in the pipeline, offensive and defensive linemen, safeties.

That is old school 3 yds and a cloud of dust thinking.

That is not the current NFL.

Not that those positions are not important, but Recievers are more important that ever.

WR is the new RB


How many 1st round picks does GB have? The key to a potent passing attack is to have a great QB and give him time to throw.

Playing D still matters also. GB will find that out soon.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
.

The bigger point is, if you are worried about the future, the last thing you want in the 1st round is a WR. Those are the final pieces of the puzzle. You want LBs in the pipeline, offensive and defensive linemen, safeties.

That is old school 3 yds and a cloud of dust thinking.

That is not the current NFL.

Not that those positions are not important, but Recievers are more important that ever.

WR is the new RB


How many 1st round picks does GB have? The key to a potent passing attack is to have a great QB and give him time to throw.

Playing D still matters also. GB will find that out soon.

Jennings and Nelson were both second rounders.

A far cry from a flier in the 4th round

Im not arguing for taking a WR in the first round specifically, but it is as important as any position outside of QB

I think you are underestimating how difficult it is to find a good reciever because a few success stories in later rounds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
rogers park bryan wrote:
I think you are underestimating how difficult it is to find a good reciever because a few success stories in later rounds.


I'm not at all. My point is it is exceedingly difficult to find a WR - outside of a few (nearly) sure things.

You know what's less difficult? Buying a free agent with a proven track record of success. Adequate WRs are out there, stud Tackles, great defensive players are rarely so. You have to draft those guys.

Adequate WRs, and maybe a top 15-type guy like Bowe, will get the job done if Cutler is as good as he is supposed to be. Draft guys that are less of a crapshoot than WRs.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
No the lineman list DOES NOT look better.

If you listed how many years they started next to the reciever (as if that means something) the WR list would be a lot better.


Alex Barron started for 5 years- AWFUL
Robert Gallery has started at Guard for 6 years- HUGE BUST


So Ill need something more than Years as primary starter.


Going over the lists I got about 22 good Wr and 25 Bad
The lineman are slightly better at 15 good 13 Bads


I dont think drafting an OL who's good is as easy as youre making it seem.

But we have two fundamental differences here

I believe....

1) The Window on Urlacher-Tillman-Briggs is Shut, locked, and barred.

2) Defense has never been less important in this league.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
I believe....

1) The Window on Urlacher-Tillman-Briggs is Shut, locked, and barred.

I thought this at the beginning of this season and was proven wrong. These guys are still pretty damn good provided their offense can give them a bit of a break. Yes they are getting older but I don't think the window is totally closed yet. Its not open very wide though.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Playing D still matters also. GB will find that out soon.


:D

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Playing D still matters also. GB will find that out soon.


:D

Good call.


Still an offensive league


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group