It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I guess this season, we might get an answer to that ole "Buehrle vs Zambrano" question that went across many threads here.


That question was answered a loooooong time ago.

Agreed.

Zambrano 125-81 .607

Buehrle 161-119 .575


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Career WAR:

Mark Buehrle- 45.9

Carlos Zambrano- 31.3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
Career WAR:

Mark Buehrle- 45.9

Carlos Zambrano- 31.3

I was just baiting after your predictably biased comment.

Ask someone to explain to you why using a career cummalitive stat doesnt work when comparing guys who started years apart

In fact, Ill do it for you

Removing the two years Buehrle started before Zambrano became a starter and beggning in 2003 the numbers look like this:

Buehrle: 36.2
Zambrano : 31.5

Pretty close, certainly not as open/shut as you presented it.

If you need any other help understanding baseball stats, let me know


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Career suspension and DL time

Zambrano: a lot

Buerhle; none

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Career suspension and DL time

Zambrano: a lot

Buerhle; none

Yeah, If you twisted my arm Id probably go with Buehrle over the long haul but its just not as open and shut as Kenny Soze presented it.


Zambrano has definitely suffered because of his craziness


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Pretty close don't count.

Buehrle > Zambrano.

Done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
Pretty close don't count.

Buehrle > Zambrano.

Done.

Im just glad we taught you how to apply Career WAR.

A good thing came out of your ridiculous statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Win percentage is a much better stat. Oh wait you were just baiting into a losing argument. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hilarious reading some of NSBB board on this stuff. The people who post there are so out of touch with reality. Hoping the Cubs would get Logan Morrison back for Zambrano as long as we included a prospect and covered all of his deal. Goodness.

Never been there. That was pretty amusing. Best I could tell our guy was 6 hours ahead of them. The Rosenthal retweet hit at like 4:40 PM. BigFan Breaking News Center (BFBNC) could be a thing in 2012.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
Win percentage is a much better stat. Oh wait you were just baiting into a losing argument. :lol:

:lol: At least I understand the stat I was using.

As usual, your ignorance was and still is on display for all to see.

I did not lose anything. I never said Zambrano was better. I just posted a stat to prove that it wasnt as clear cut as you made it sound.

So as usual Im right and you're wrong due to your White Sox blinders. It pretty much always goes that way.


Then I made your argument for you because you dont understand even the most basic of advanced statistics.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
I did not lose anything. I never said Zambrano was better. I just posted a stat to prove that it wasnt as clear cut as you made it sound.

No, its pretty damn clear cut.

This is THE perfect example of where stats don't tell the whole story. Somebody who has never seen either pitch and is just looking at stats might be inclined to take Zambrano. Better win%, better strikeout%, etc.

But those of us who have seen both players over years know what's up. Any smart baseball guy would take the guy who will take the ball every 5th day, compete and put up decent to solid numbers all the while being a fan favorite and the consummate professional in the clubhouse and on the field, over the guy who will throw a tantrum and cost his team games/runs by his antics on the field, further hurt his team by doing things to get suspended, and being a cancer in the clubhouse as well.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I did not lose anything. I never said Zambrano was better. I just posted a stat to prove that it wasnt as clear cut as you made it sound.

No, its pretty damn clear cut.


Nope.

Sorry but my definition of pretty damn clear cut requires having better numbers.

if you have to type out two paragraphs making a case outside the numbers....its it NOT clear cut.


If you disagree, thats cool.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The eye test is in play with your car. It looks like shit.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79447
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Keyser Soze wrote:
Win percentage is a much better stat. Oh wait you were just baiting into a losing argument. :lol:


Do Zambrano's teams have a better winning percentage than Buehrle's?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91910
Location: To the left of my post
Who has more 20 strikeout games? That's what really matters.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
rogers park bryan wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I guess this season, we might get an answer to that ole "Buehrle vs Zambrano" question that went across many threads here.


That question was answered a loooooong time ago.

Agreed.

Zambrano 125-81 .607

Buehrle 161-119 .575


rogers park bryan wrote:
I did not lose anything. I never said Zambrano was better. I just posted a stat to prove that it wasnt as clear cut as you made it sound..


The creepy internet Lady doth protest too much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Win percentage is a much better stat. Oh wait you were just baiting into a losing argument. :lol:


Do Zambrano's teams have a better winning percentage than Buehrle's?

Derrek Lee career WAR: 31.1

Prince Fielder career War: 24.1


Lee is the better player clearly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:

The creepy internet Lady doth protest too much.

This post was sent from Kenny Williams bushes /\


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Derrek Lee career WAR: 31.1

Prince Fielder career War: 24.1


Lee is the better player clearly

rogers park bryan wrote:
Sorry but my definition of pretty damn clear cut requires having better numbers.

So you are saying that Derrek Lee has better numbers than Price Fielder?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Buehrle is by far a much better pitcher than Zambrano is. I don't even see it being close. Zambrano peaked hard and is currently dropping off hard. After 2007 he couldn't turn in 200 innings. Buhrle is always turns in 200+, every damn year. He's not punching his catcher. He's not breaking bats over his knee or going all out in BP and risking injury. He shuts the fuck up and throws the damn ball.

Also W/L's and thusly winning % is a terrible stat by which to judge a pitcher, in my opinion.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Derrek Lee career WAR: 31.1

Prince Fielder career War: 24.1


Lee is the better player clearly

rogers park bryan wrote:
Sorry but my definition of pretty damn clear cut requires having better numbers.

So you are saying that Derrek Lee has better numbers than Price Fielder?

Uh...no Frank

That was sarcastic. Career WAR of a player who has been around longer being higher means nothing.

Only a complete idiot who doesnt understand baseball would attempt to make such a claim.


Fielder's numbers are better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
Buehrle is by far a much better pitcher than Zambrano is. I don't even see it being close. Zambrano peaked hard and is currently dropping off hard. After 2007 he couldn't turn in 200 innings. Buhrle is always turns in 200+, every damn year. He's not punching his catcher. He's not breaking bats over his knee or going all out in BP and risking injury. He shuts the fuck up and throws the damn ball.

Also W/L's and thusly winning % is a terrible stat by which to judge a pitcher, in my opinion.

Sounds like some of it is personal with Zambrano

Winning pct is definitely better than Career WAR though.


I think Wins gets a bad rap. Its not perfect obviously but Ive yet to see a great pitcher who doesnt end up with a great winning pct


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Darkside wrote:
Also W/L's and thusly winning % is a terrible stat by which to judge a pitcher, in my opinion.

Agreed. Which is why its unfair to guys like Bert Blyleven that such stats are used against him. ERA is better and in Buerhle's case having a career ERA under 4, in the AL, where he starts 15 or so games a year in a bandbox, that is pretty damn clear cut.

But as far as that first part of that post, well I mean if you have to type out a whole paragraph making a case outside the numbers.........

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
The last couple pages have been all kinds of fun.

Nice signature RPB.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Only a complete idiot who doesnt understand baseball would attempt to make such a claim.

Same could be said of taking Zambrano over Buehrle.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Also W/L's and thusly winning % is a terrible stat by which to judge a pitcher, in my opinion.

Agreed. Which is why its unfair to guys like Bert Blyleven that such stats are used against him. ERA is better and in Buerhle's case having a career ERA under 4, in the AL, where he starts 15 or so games a year in a bandbox, that is pretty damn clear cut.

But as far as that first part of that post, well I mean if you have to type out a whole paragraph making a case outside the numbers.........

Im sorry that we disagree on the how much better of a pitcher Buehrle is than Zambrano.

Dont take it so hard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Only a complete idiot who doesnt understand baseball would attempt to make such a claim.

Same could be said of taking Zambrano over Buehrle.


Which no one has said. So there's that.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Only a complete idiot who doesnt understand baseball would attempt to make such a claim.

Same could be said of taking Zambrano over Buehrle.

No Frank, it couldnt

See, now you are gonna start losing credibility.


One guy used a stat that is competely useless and cant be used in any way to determine the subject.

The other guy just thinks the difference in two pitchers is not as much.


Can you please look at this objectively?

BTW, who said Zambrano was better?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Buehrle is by far a much better pitcher than Zambrano is. I don't even see it being close. Zambrano peaked hard and is currently dropping off hard. After 2007 he couldn't turn in 200 innings. Buhrle is always turns in 200+, every damn year. He's not punching his catcher. He's not breaking bats over his knee or going all out in BP and risking injury. He shuts the fuck up and throws the damn ball.

Also W/L's and thusly winning % is a terrible stat by which to judge a pitcher, in my opinion.

Sounds like some of it is personal with Zambrano

Winning pct is definitely better than Career WAR though.


I think Wins gets a bad rap. Its not perfect obviously but Ive yet to see a great pitcher who doesnt end up with a great winning pct

It's not personal to me. It's part of his personality. It has a lot to do with the quality of pitcher. Buehrle's leadership qualities vs. Zambrano's whatever you call it is a part of the equation.

I wouldn't compare pitchers from different seasons on Career WAR. That's why I didn't do it.
Wins is a very misleading stat in my opinion. Although great pitchers on bad teams (ahem Greg Maddux on the Cubs) still manage to squeak out 19 or 20 win seasons so your statement does hold some water.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
RFDC wrote:
The last couple pages have been all kinds of fun.

Nice signature RPB.

Right back atcha :thumleft:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group