It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
So really this turns out to be a semantic argument of what "Clearly" meant? ok.

I don't think anyone here would say Z was better than Buehrle.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Buehrle is by far a much better pitcher than Zambrano is. I don't even see it being close. Zambrano peaked hard and is currently dropping off hard. After 2007 he couldn't turn in 200 innings. Buhrle is always turns in 200+, every damn year. He's not punching his catcher. He's not breaking bats over his knee or going all out in BP and risking injury. He shuts the fuck up and throws the damn ball.

Also W/L's and thusly winning % is a terrible stat by which to judge a pitcher, in my opinion.

Sounds like some of it is personal with Zambrano

Winning pct is definitely better than Career WAR though.


I think Wins gets a bad rap. Its not perfect obviously but Ive yet to see a great pitcher who doesnt end up with a great winning pct

It's not personal to me. It's part of his personality. It has a lot to do with the quality of pitcher. Buehrle's leadership qualities vs. Zambrano's whatever you call it is a part of the equation.

Fair enough. You can see how I thought that by your wording though.


Darkside wrote:
[I wouldn't compare pitchers from different seasons on Career WAR. That's why I didn't do it.
Wins is a very misleading stat in my opinion. Although great pitchers on bad teams (ahem Greg Maddux on the Cubs) still manage to squeak out 19 or 20 win seasons so your statement does hold some water.

Yeah, I think Wins is a bad stat in small samples but over a 10-15 year career it usually bears out accurate results.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:57 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79446
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Also W/L's and thusly winning % is a terrible stat by which to judge a pitcher, in my opinion.


The more esoteric stats (WAR, win shares, etc.) aside, what do you think is better for judging a starting pitcher? Those numbers are telling you a whole lot about a guy.

I'm not arguing that Buehrle isn't by far the guy you'd want on your team for all kinds of reasons, but on a strict basis of performance, it's a very close call between these guys. Zambrano has a better winning percentage on teams with a worse winning percentage. That does tell us something about how he performed.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
So really this turns out to be a semantic argument of what "Clearly" meant? ok.

I don't think anyone here would say Z was better than Buehrle.

To be fair, years ago (07-08) I would have made the argument. Buehrle was starting his descent from his great 05 and Zambrano looked to be finally getting some consistency.

Obviously its gone the other way since then


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82147
rogers park bryan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I did not lose anything. I never said Zambrano was better. I just posted a stat to prove that it wasnt as clear cut as you made it sound.

No, its pretty damn clear cut.


Nope.

Sorry but my definition of pretty damn clear cut requires having better numbers.

if you have to type out two paragraphs making a case outside the numbers....its it NOT clear cut.


If you disagree, thats cool.


The only numbers you need to know:

Fair Market Value for Buehrle is 14+ million per year

FMV for Zambrano is somewhere around 3 million and only for one year

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The more esoteric stats (WAR, win shares, etc.) aside, what do you think is better for judging a starting pitcher? Those numbers are telling you a whole lot about a guy.

I'm not arguing that Buehrle isn't by far the guy you'd want on your team for all kinds of reasons, but on a strict basis of performance, it's a very close call between these guys. Zambrano has a better winning percentage on teams with a worse winning percentage. That does tell us something about how he performed.

I think pitchers are very hard to judge. Because what do you really use? If a great pitcher is on a bad team, he loses out on wins perhaps because he's got no offense behind him. Does Maddux have a great k/9? Not really, not when compared to Randy Johnson, but he's still one of the greatest ever, isn't he? Would Kerry Wood be a better pitcher than maddux? no, and so you can't use K/9.
Although they're still a bit skewed, I like WHIP and BB/9 as pitchet statistics. I think they're probably this most concentrated on what you're really trying to achieve as a pitcher, low hits and walks.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:

The only numbers you need to know:

Fair Market Value for Buehrle is 14+ million per year

FMV for Zambrano is somewhere around 3 million and only for one year

But we are comparing careers, not current value


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82147
Well then no Cub pitcher's career stats are complete without including the underrated simulated game/towel throwing record.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:16 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79446
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The more esoteric stats (WAR, win shares, etc.) aside, what do you think is better for judging a starting pitcher? Those numbers are telling you a whole lot about a guy.

I'm not arguing that Buehrle isn't by far the guy you'd want on your team for all kinds of reasons, but on a strict basis of performance, it's a very close call between these guys. Zambrano has a better winning percentage on teams with a worse winning percentage. That does tell us something about how he performed.

I think pitchers are very hard to judge. Because what do you really use? If a great pitcher is on a bad team, he loses out on wins perhaps because he's got no offense behind him. Does Maddux have a great k/9? Not really, not when compared to Randy Johnson, but he's still one of the greatest ever, isn't he? Would Kerry Wood be a better pitcher than maddux? no, and so you can't use K/9.
Although they're still a bit skewed, I like WHIP and BB/9 as pitchet statistics. I think they're probably this most concentrated on what you're really trying to achieve as a pitcher, low hits and walks.


Yeah, it's complicated. It's a complicated game. Although Maddux isn't considered a "strikeout pitcher" and he certainly isn't a Ryan or a Johnson, his K/9 is still pretty high. I don't believe he ever led the league in Ks, but I'm pretty sure he was second at least once. He struck out more than most people think. Part of that is because he was so efficient he was able to last deep into games. He also had the advantage of facing the pitcher two or three times per game. I think that's often overlooked when comparing guys across leagues.

I think WHIP is critical for relievers. But for starters things get murkier. The current conventional wisdom is that "a pitcher's job is to prevent runs". I would say a starting pitcher's job is to allow less runs than the pitcher(s) he is facing. I watched a lot of Orlando Hernandez the year he was with the Sox. And there were often guys that he just refused to face. He wouldn't pitch to them. That resulted in a higher WHIP, but he usually got out of the inning by getting the guy he was comfortable pitching to.

I think over enough time, a starter's W/L record is going to tell you pretty much all you need to know about him. Aaron Sele might be an exception. But what difference does it make? If the guy was lucky, I'll take lucky.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Grampa El Duque was AWESOME the first several weeks of '05 for the Sox.

Then Grampa Contreras took over :lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:20 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79446
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Grampa El Duque was AWESOME the first several weeks of '05 for the Sox.

Then Grampa Contreras took over :lol: :lol:



Contreras is my favorite player ever. He was an awesome pitcher. I think it's a shame we didn't get to see his whole career played in the big leagues. I have no doubt he'd be a first ballot Hall of Famer. He's Satchel Paige fifty years later.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Major League service time:

Mark Buehrle- 11.078

Carlos Zambrano- 10.022


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
Major League service time:

Mark Buehrle- 11.078

Carlos Zambrano- 10.022

:lol:

Keep trying to justify your ignorance.

Zambrano has been a starter for 9.5 years

Buehrle has been a starter for 11 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
Well then no Cub pitcher's career stats are complete without including the underrated simulated game/towel throwing record.

That is one of the fond memories of Zambrano. That he was never part of the towel throwing team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:31 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79446
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Well then no Cub pitcher's career stats are complete without including the underrated simulated game/towel throwing record.

That is one of the fond memories of Zambrano. That he was never part of the towel throwing team.


No, he was on the Gatorade cooler tossing squad.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Grampa El Duque was AWESOME the first several weeks of '05 for the Sox.

Then Grampa Contreras took over :lol: :lol:



Contreras is my favorite player ever. He was an awesome pitcher. I think it's a shame we didn't get to see his whole career played in the big leagues. I have no doubt he'd be a first ballot Hall of Famer. He's Satchel Paige fifty years later.

His life should be a movie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
My favorite Z memory is the grand slam he gave up to Carlos Quentin, and the $15million is he getting from the Cubs to pitch for the Marlins :lol:

rogers park bryan wrote:
Obviously its gone the other way since then

Clearly its gone the other way since then.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
My favorite Z memory is the grand slam he gave up to Carlos Quentin, and the $15million is he getting from the Cubs to pitch for the Marlins :lol:

Cool
rogers park bryan wrote:
Obviously its gone the other way since then

Clearly its gone the other way since then.[/quote]
Yeah, that's what I said


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Darkside wrote:
And what if he starts 30 games, wins 20 and is a Cy finalist?

I firmly believe that if this were to happen, Ozzie is one of the only managers who could get production out of him.


If he is a Cy finalist, his option year vests and the Marlins will owe him $19M in 2013.


he waived this and got a 100K bonus if he wins comeback player of the year

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
Frank Coztansa wrote:
My favorite Z memory is the grand slam he gave up to Carlos Quentin, and the $15million is he getting from the Cubs to pitch for the Marlins :lol:



Yep Biggie posts more in the Sox section than you do in the Cubs

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Last edited by RFDC on Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Wow. Ozzie might have been a sleezy guy. He seems to have been tampering around with Miami before he was done with the Sox. He was tampering with Zambrano too I think.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91909
Location: To the left of my post
Darkside wrote:
Wow. Ozzie might have been a sleezy guy. He seems to have been tampering around with Miami before he was done with the Sox. He was tampering with Zambrano too I think.
So far though he's probably helped the Sox and Cubs more than the Marlins so it's not a big deal.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I was hoping they just keep BigZ. This was his "Money" year if he wanted big cash going forward. That being said , Theo is using the same strategy I said they should use with Soriano. Replace him with a low cost option who actually might perform better than the high priced guy he replaced. You have to pay out 15 million anyway you look at it,but now you have a guy who is a "plus" in the clubhouse and maybe on the field,too.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
Wow. Ozzie might have been a sleezy guy. He seems to have been tampering around with Miami before he was done with the Sox. He was tampering with Zambrano too I think.

Where is this coming from?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
immessedup17 wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I was hoping they just keep BigZ. This was his "Money" year if he wanted big cash going forward. That being said , Theo is using the same strategy I said they should use with Soriano. Replace him with a low cost option who actually might perform better than the high priced guy he replaced. You have to pay out 15 million anyway you look at it,but now you have a guy who is a "plus" in the clubhouse and maybe on the field,too.

This had no benefit to the 2012 Cubs. Not a playoff team no matter what - it doesn't matter if Z would have won 12 or 18 games. Lost season...you don't want him to stick around after the season anyways, and you certainly wouldn't give him a new contract no matter what.

Theo should dump whatever payroll he can this season, and build towards the future. Z was one step...Soriano and Byrd would be nice...as much as I like Dempster, that wouldn't be terrible either.


If he was good for the Cubs this year, his option would have vested and the Cubs would be stuck with him another year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Your right. I always beleive you have a chance with decent pitching. Who's to say though the Cubs didn't upgrade the pitching with this trade,anyway? I hope that's the case.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Wow. Ozzie might have been a sleezy guy. He seems to have been tampering around with Miami before he was done with the Sox. He was tampering with Zambrano too I think.

Where is this coming from?

Are you serious or what is this?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
rogers park bryan wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Major League service time:

Mark Buehrle- 11.078

Carlos Zambrano- 10.022

:lol:

Keep trying to justify your ignorance.

Zambrano has been a starter for 9.5 years

Buehrle has been a starter for 11 years.

So now we're down to 1.5 years difference (I guess the other .5 year is just ignored) and a 14.6 difference in career WAR covering a long stretch of time. Carreer WAR is a very good indicator of Buehrle's supremacy over Zambrano.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
A few years ago I thought Z was better and that it wasn't close. Things have changed since then. I still believe Z has better stuff for whatever that's worth.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIG Z
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Major League service time:

Mark Buehrle- 11.078

Carlos Zambrano- 10.022

:lol:

Keep trying to justify your ignorance.

Zambrano has been a starter for 9.5 years

Buehrle has been a starter for 11 years.

So now we're down to 1.5 years difference (I guess the other .5 year is just ignored) and a 14.6 difference in career WAR covering a long stretch of time. Carreer WAR is a very good indicator of Buehrle's supremacy over Zambrano.

:lol:
No, it's not

Everyone here can see that. You fucked up. Just admit it.

Did you wanna also include the 7.1 innings Zambrano pitched in 2001 as if its equal to a full year?

Is it the first grade level math you are having a problem with?


Im flattered that you've spent hours trying to understand WAR so you can discuss baseball with those of us who know it, but it seems like your understanding it less and less

Buehrle made 45 starts before Zambrano became a starter. Its not reasonable to use the stats compliled during that season in comparison. It is flat out dumb

And using WAR for a year a pitcher only started for half the year renders the stat pretty meaningless. But even including the half year, your numbers are way off.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group