Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
So we should try and preserve all the unique aspects of the park to make sure the Cubs remain a special team at the expense of making moves that will help the club win?
You're actually pulling a Goff/Berns bleachers thing here.
Youre a Sox fan. You have zero interest in the Cubs winning.
Its easy for you to dismiss attempts to draw revenue to aid in build a winning team because to you the Cubs are Wrigley and you like going to games there.
If Wrigley maintains its charm and the Cubs never make the playoffs, you'll be just fine.
I dont think its a stretch to say no other fan of any team on the planet can truly understand what it means to root for a team that is in its 11th Decade of not winning a title.
Why is the Cubs being "special" or a natl team important? Who cares? Ill gladly take a Marlins type existance over a team that sucks for 100 years but gets a lot of ESPN sunday night games. I mean if you are looking at it from a make money owing the team standpoint, you make sense but why would a cub fan care or even consider that point of view?
Being on equal footing with the Sox might be a good thing. Having to WIN to make money is probably a good thing from a fan's stand point.
There is only 1 goal as a cub fan. See them win a World Series before you die. None of the other stuff matters....to me at least. I dont hate the park or curse the IVY but if they built a cookie cutter and won a WS id be more than pleased and would be able to deal with the fact that less douchebags from Iowa will be going to games.
I think the flaw in this thinking is the belief that changing the park to be like many others is actually going to help them win. One thing I'm pretty sure it won't do is generate more money long term. The fact that they have a special park is the reason they are one of the top revenue producing teams. The Sox have an entire level of skyboxes they don't use. Just because you build something doesn't mean you can sell it. But I guess no one knows for sure. bernstein is convinced a Cub Town out in a cornfield in Huntley would be the biggest money-maker since the pop-up toaster. I just don't believe that.
In what thinking? I didnt say it was a magic ticket. My stance is not Bernstein's. I think the location is more important than the park if were having that discussion
But the special park thing hasnt really produced a lot of results. My point is, whatever moves you deem a step towards winning should be made regardless of how it affects the special ballpark. Sure they might be wrong, but I dont want my team operating to protect the park before winning. Make the moves to win, THEN if you can try and preserve the special factor.
And I think you are mistaken on this swinging back to a Sox town or the Cubs losing appeal.
That war is over. The Cubs won. They are a national and even a global team. That is not going away. If Wrigley crumbles today (could happen) the Cubs are still the Cubs and fans of that Evil Red C will still be fans.
I know how it was before Wrigleyville happened. Sox were bigger at some points. But that was before ESPN (HUGE part in making the Cubs natl) and the internet and every other form of media that has magnified exposure.
My point is the Natl teams have been decided in all the major sports and that is not changing. (If it could change it would take generations to happen)
Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers, Cubs will always have the natl appeal.
Maybe Im wrong.
If I didnt know you better, Id think you were a Sox fan that is just hating on the Cubs and has convinced himself that its just the park and other than that Cubs = Sox. That WAS true, before the Cubs took the market. I just dont think it can be reversed.