It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:00 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 286 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Does Reggie Miller Belong in the Hall of Fame?
Yes 89%  89%  [ 33 ]
No 11%  11%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 37
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:46 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
And the "You didn't see him play" argument is bullshit.


FavreFan wrote:
You don't need stats. Your eyes should tell you Rodman was a great player, a greater one than guys like Alex English and Kiki Vandeweghe.


Who you crappin'?

You certainly didn't see enough of English and Rodman if you're coming to the conclusion that Rodman was better.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:48 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
spanky wrote:
You're late for church, JORR.


:lol: I might have to miss it today. I'm going to sit around at home trying to figure out how exactly this great legendary player who was always considered so much better than every All-Star was traded for Will Perdue.


Carmelo was traded for Felton and Gallinari, who have a combine zero (0) all star game appearances :wink:


I'm not ignoring you, Bagels. And I want to point out that you're forgetting about Wilson Chandler, a bunch of picks, and a few million bucks. :wink:

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:52 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Are you really saying that somebody made a mistake in selecting Reggie Miller to the All-Star game five times and Rodman really should have been there instead?


Not at all. The All-Star game is a show for fans, and fans like to watch scoring. It makes sense why Reggie Miller would be voted on to more All-Star games than Rodman. That has nothing to do with whether Rodman was the best rebounder in the league from an effectiveness standpoint.

Which, of course, he was.


Who are you arguing with? I've never suggested Rodman wasn't the best rebounder in the league at times during his career.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:55 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
There's only been one guy in this entire thread who has made a reasonable case for Rodman's greatness and that is Zeph. But there are problems with some of the metrics he's cited. Like I pointed out, I don't think any of you are going to argue that Marcus Camby was a better player than Akeem. A lot of you seem to be relying on emotion and fuzzy Bulls memories.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bagels wrote:

Carmelo was traded for Felton and Gallinari, who have a combine zero (0) all star game appearances :wink:


I'm not ignoring you, Bagels. And I want to point out that you're forgetting about Wilson Chandler, a bunch of picks, and a few million bucks. :wink:


:lol:

no i was referring to Ugie and FF who basically said the same thing I did several posts later. in any case yes, the trade was far more complicated than that, but those were the principals. and c'mon- you know in the NBA more than any other league trades are made for reasons other than talent. but, i would agree that Rodman wore out his welcome in San Antonio and probably "needed" Jordan and Jackson to control him. but also the Spurs had Robinson in his prime at the time, i don't think they needed Rodman as much as the Bulls did , it was obviously a good fit for him


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's only been one guy in this entire thread who has made a reasonable case for Rodman's greatness and that is Zeph. But there are problems with some of the metrics he's cited. Like I pointed out, I don't think any of you are going to argue that Marcus Camby was a better player than Akeem. A lot of you seem to be relying on emotion and fuzzy Bulls memories.


but now you're throwing out an argument that was never made- or at least i didn't see it...no one argued that Rodman was better than Olajuwon or David Robinson or Barkely ...only that his skillset was more valuable than a career 18ppg scorer like Miller . if i missed where someone here was claiming that, feel free to point it out


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Vince Carter was traded for Aaron Willams. But Vince Carter also made a bunch of all star games. I'm confused now.... :?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:04 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Bagels wrote:
no i was referring to Ugie and FF who basically said the same thing I did several posts later. in any case yes, the trade was far more complicated than that, but those were the principals. and c'mon- you know in the NBA more than any other league trades are made for reasons other than talent. but, i would agree that Rodman wore out his welcome in San Antonio and probably "needed" Jordan and Jackson to control him. but also the Spurs had Robinson in his prime at the time, i don't think they needed Rodman as much as the Bulls did , it was obviously a good fit for him


I agree with everything in your post there. But as a guy who followed the NBA in that time, I know you're not going to agree with FF or anyone else who suggests that in the time they were all playing, anyone thought Rodman was the player that Buck Williams was, that Shawn Kemp was. I'm sure I can do some research and find articles from Chicago beat writers wondering if the Rodman deal was a good idea.

He wasn't considered a key guy on those Detroit champions. He was just one of the guys in a deep rotation. I don't think anyone would assign those as "Rodman's championships". Then when went to the Spurs, he seemed to be exactly the piece they needed to put them over, a guy who would provide toughness and help Robinson rebound. But he tore that team apart. He missed about twenty games due to indifference. And now twenty years later I have to listen to a guy like HOVA who should know better tell me what a great team player he was? Come on.

By the time he got to the Bulls whatever star he ever had was fading fast as evidenced by the fact they could get him for Perdue. But he fit in perfectly and Phil idn't ask him to do anything he didn't want to do. Even then he caused some problems, but at that point in their careers Michael and Scottie were so seasoned and professional that they could roll with it and the team could absorb his nonsense.

Is any of that wrong?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:07 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Vince Carter was traded for Aaron Willams. But Vince Carter also made a bunch of all star games. I'm confused now.... :?


Don't be confused. Vince Carter was a great player and looked like he was on a Hall of Fame path for awhile.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I know you didn't ask me but yes, some of that was wrong. Characterizing Rodman as just a rotation player for those Pistons teams was wrong. Saying Buck Williams was better than Rodman was wrong.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Vince Carter was traded for Aaron Willams. But Vince Carter also made a bunch of all star games. I'm confused now.... :?


Don't be confused. Vince Carter was a great player and looked like he was on a Hall of Fame path for awhile.

But he was traded for a player worse than Will Purdue when he was in his prime. That pretty much invalidates that part of your argument.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bagels wrote:
no i was referring to Ugie and FF who basically said the same thing I did several posts later. in any case yes, the trade was far more complicated than that, but those were the principals. and c'mon- you know in the NBA more than any other league trades are made for reasons other than talent. but, i would agree that Rodman wore out his welcome in San Antonio and probably "needed" Jordan and Jackson to control him. but also the Spurs had Robinson in his prime at the time, i don't think they needed Rodman as much as the Bulls did , it was obviously a good fit for him


I agree with everything in your post there. But as a guy who followed the NBA in that time, I know you're not going to agree with FF or anyone else who suggests that in the time they were all playing, anyone thought Rodman was the player that Buck Williams was, that Shawn Kemp was. I'm sure I can do some research and find articles from Chicago beat writers wondering if the Rodman deal was a good idea.

He wasn't considered a key guy on those Detroit champions. He was just one of the guys in a deep rotation. I don't think anyone would assign those as "Rodman's championships". Then when went to the Spurs, he seemed to be exactly the piece they needed to put them over, a guy who would provide toughness and help Robinson rebound. But he tore that team apart. He missed about twenty games due to indifference. And now twenty years later I have to listen to a guy like HOVA who should know better tell me what a great team player he was? Come on.

By the time he got to the Bulls whatever star he ever had was fading fast as evidenced by the fact they could get him for Perdue. But he fit in perfectly and Phil idn't ask him to do anything he didn't want to do. Even then he caused some problems, but at that point in their careers Michael and Scottie were so seasoned and professional that they could roll with it and the team could absorb his nonsense.

Is any of that wrong?


well, i admit that i may be somewhat bias in a bad way toward Buck Williams....in the early 90's when i started watching basketball on a more than casual basis, he was in his later years. obviously he was still pretty solid but just a contributor on those Blazers teams. i never really saw his prime years with the Nets. i'm not denying he was a great player. but the articles you could find wondering whether or not it was a good idea for the Bulls to get Rodman was surely related to his personality. i don't want to speak for HOVA but i'm guessing when people say he's a great team player it's because the majority of NBA players want to score, and here was a player that didn't care about scoring and relished doing the dirty work. and the fact that not only did he want to do it, he did it at an extremely high level. and again, implying that his talent level was fading because they were able to get him for Perdue isn't really accurate as evidenced by the fact that his numbers dipped slightly, but still pretty much consistent to what he was doing in San Antonio. it was simply that the Spurs were fed up and wanted to get rid of him. They had a great interior defensive presence already in Robinson and could afford to let him go if he was causing trouble, whereas the Bulls were willing to take the gamble they could keep him in line with Jordan, Scottie and Phil since Grant was gone and they needed toughness inside . and it worked out, obviously


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
and yeah, i also disagree with the contention that Rodman was just a rotation player on the Pistons teams
just because they were deep teams doesn't negate his importance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:21 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
I know you didn't ask me but yes, some of that was wrong. Characterizing Rodman as just a rotation player for those Pistons teams was wrong. Saying Buck Williams was better than Rodman was wrong.


No, you're wrong.

Here's an article by Sam Smith showing you what he thought of him at the time he came to the Bulls:

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1995 ... -rebounder

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:22 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17984
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Who are you arguing with? I've never suggested Rodman wasn't the best rebounder in the league at times during his career.


I'm answering your question regarding whether I thought "people had a mistake selecting Reggie Miller over Rodman in the All-Star Game". Obviously Miller was going to make more games because of his scoring output, just like Bagels and I stated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:25 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Bagels wrote:
and yeah, i also disagree with the contention that Rodman was just a rotation player on the Pistons teams
just because they were deep teams doesn't negate his importance


I just think you guys are remembering wrong. Was he considered a more important guy on those teams than Laimbeer? Than Aguirre? Than Salley? I don't think so. Daly developed him and he became a defensive specialist and a top rebounder. But I can't believe anyone would mention him as a main guy on those Detroit teams.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I know you didn't ask me but yes, some of that was wrong. Characterizing Rodman as just a rotation player for those Pistons teams was wrong. Saying Buck Williams was better than Rodman was wrong.


No, you're wrong.

Here's an article by Sam Smith showing you what he thought of him at the time he came to the Bulls:

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1995 ... -rebounder

No, you are wrong. You probably should have picked someone more credible than Sam Smith to help your case. Why would I even bother reading that garbage?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bagels wrote:
and yeah, i also disagree with the contention that Rodman was just a rotation player on the Pistons teams
just because they were deep teams doesn't negate his importance


I just think you guys are remembering wrong. Was he considered a more important guy on those teams than Laimbeer? Than Aguirre? Than Salley? I don't think so. Daly developed him and he became a defensive specialist and a top rebounder. But I can't believe anyone would mention him as a main guy on those Detroit teams.

He was more important than Aguirre and Salley. Laimbeer was a team leader but their on-court importance was comparable.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
HOVA wrote:
Only person who appears not to believe Rodman was good is you. Everyone considered Rodman great. He sacrificed in ways many people wouldn't.


Who the fuck are you talking to? Show me one time in this entire fucking thread where I said Rodman was less than good. You're rewriting history. Rodman was never considered a great team player. He was viewed as a pain in the ass.


He averaged damn near 30 points a game in college but because the Pistons didn't need scoring he focused on defense and rebounding. He ended up making a HoF career out of those things. That is sacrificing for the team in my world.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I know you didn't ask me but yes, some of that was wrong. Characterizing Rodman as just a rotation player for those Pistons teams was wrong. Saying Buck Williams was better than Rodman was wrong.


No, you're wrong.

Here's an article by Sam Smith showing you what he thought of him at the time he came to the Bulls:

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1995 ... -rebounder

No, you are wrong. You probably should have picked someone more credible than Sam Smith to help your case. Why would I even bother reading that garbage?


maybe next he'll find some trade rumors from Peter Vescey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24344
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Who better to use than Hall of Famer Sam Smith.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:38 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Sam Smith wasnt alone. That was a prevailing view at the time. Will Perdue.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Sam Smith wasnt alone. That was a prevailing view at the time. Will Perdue.

No it wasn't. The prevailing view was that Phil and Jordan would keep him in line. Aaron Williams.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
you keep bring up being traded for Will Perdue, JORR, but he was also traded for Sean Elliot just 2 years before that (an all-star at the time)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:15 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Sam Smith wasnt alone. That was a prevailing view at the time. Will Perdue.

No it wasn't. The prevailing view was that Phil and Jordan would keep him in line. Aaron Williams.


Do you lack such confidence in your position that you find it ncessary to fail mentioning Mourning and the two first rounders?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Sam Smith wasnt alone. That was a prevailing view at the time. Will Perdue.

No it wasn't. The prevailing view was that Phil and Jordan would keep him in line. Aaron Williams.


Do you lack such confidence in your position that you find it ncessary to fail mentioning Mourning and the two first rounders?

The first rounders were late first rounders. Did Mourning ever play a game for Toronto? Try again.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:42 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80114
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Late first rounders dont count?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
:lol:

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
So the modern version of Reggie vs. Rodman would be

Ben Wallace (Detroit version) vs. Peja ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
rodman>ben wallace

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 286 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group