It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:41 am
Posts: 557
pizza_Place: Taco Bell Mexican Pizza
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
you get the President off msg in the midst of the campaign


Is Obama doing Knicks games?

_________________
I love Terry Boers. I hate Tim Tebow. The fact that the former will die before the latter show what a cruel, unjust world we live in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I think I'm good with never finding anything else about this guy ever. Unless he had something to do with "Community" coming back on. He doesn't write for "Community" does he?


wait, they canceled Community? I wondered why it wasn't showing up on the torrent feeds anymore. that sucks.



They put it on hiatus and were thinking of cancelling it. But I received word the other day that it's indeed coming back. Really good show...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Krazy Ivan wrote:
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I think I'm good with never finding anything else about this guy ever. Unless he had something to do with "Community" coming back on. He doesn't write for "Community" does he?


wait, they canceled Community? I wondered why it wasn't showing up on the torrent feeds anymore. that sucks.



They put it on hiatus and were thinking of cancelling it. But I received word the other day that it's indeed coming back. Really good show...

Eaglo Jeff wrote:
Jiggs wrote:
MMMMM....Community....put it on HOLD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
WhiteAndProud wrote:
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
you get the President off msg in the midst of the campaign


Is Obama doing Knicks games?


He might if he loses in November. Or Bulls games. Could also see dude taking a shot at the Senior PGA tour.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Ron Paul didn't run in Michigan but he ran ads there attacking Santorum. Guess who they helped? Mitt Romney. Why does he continue to conspire with Romney to destroy America so his son can get a job?

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
Q.Bovifs wrote:
NearWessSideHussra wrote:
Q.Bovifs wrote:
From what I have seen, he was preparing to release videos from Obama's college years - purportedly showing him being indoctrinated by "Weather Underground" types - that some say would have been completely devastating to his campaign. I believe that he spoke about this upcoming release at a CPAC meeting just this month.


I'd be more disappointed had President Obama not flirted with radicalism in his youth.

Tho if this Breitbart had such a video, from a strategic impact standpoint, he was playing it correctly by waiting to release it closer to the election.

Release it now and it gets consumed and digested and its impact fades to almost nil by the time November rolls around. Release it a few weeks shy of the election and, if nothing else, you get the President off msg in the midst of the campaign having to address the issue. And voters might not have time to fully digest its (lack of) significance and might wonder if there's more out there they don't know etc etc.

Who knows? Maybe it contained an admission that he was not a US citizen or something to that effect.

Or that he was the original Terminator X.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
I'm pretty sure that Obama could join Al Queda today and still beat Mitt Romney.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Obama could join Al Queda today and still beat Mitt Romney.


Right now Mitt Romney disagrees. If you wait a couple mins he will be on your side.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Obama could join Al Queda today and still beat Mitt Romney.


Maybe today, but probably not if gas is $6 a gallon in November.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Obama could join Al Queda today and still beat Mitt Romney.


Maybe today, but probably not if gas is $6 a gallon in November.
As long as Mitt Romney is still a rich guy he'll be painted as a man who doesn't care about minor things like $6 gas. Mitt Romney doesn't even optionally pay his "fair share" of taxes!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Obama could join Al Queda today and still beat Mitt Romney.


Maybe today, but probably not if gas is $6 a gallon in November.
As long as Mitt Romney is still a rich guy he'll be painted as a man who doesn't care about minor things like $6 gas. Mitt Romney doesn't even optionally pay his "fair share" of taxes!


Isn't Obama really rich as well?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Obama could join Al Queda today and still beat Mitt Romney.


Maybe today, but probably not if gas is $6 a gallon in November.


Gas may reach $5 in the summer but there is no way it will reach $6 in November.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
SomeGuy wrote:
Isn't Obama really rich as well?
He's a Democrat so it doesn't matter.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Obama could join Al Queda today and still beat Mitt Romney.


Maybe today, but probably not if gas is $6 a gallon in November.
As long as Mitt Romney is still a rich guy he'll be painted as a man who doesn't care about minor things like $6 gas. Mitt Romney doesn't even optionally pay his "fair share" of taxes!


About half of Obama' $125 mill political war chest is from Wall Street. With many $500K donations.
Romney has about $56 Mill total

Who is the Bankers choice?

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Everyone knows Romney is Wall Street's candidate. They're not really hedging their bets.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Really wish there was a single candidate in this election that combines fiscally conservative policies without being a social nut job

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Northside_Dan wrote:
Really wish there was a single candidate in this election that combines fiscally conservative policies without being a social nut job


I think a lot of people think like this. It's too bad really. Why can't a candidate do both, it sounds fairly easy.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Northside_Dan wrote:
Really wish there was a single candidate in this election that combines fiscally conservative policies without being a social nut job


That sounds like Romney. We can never be too sure because he'll change his position at any moment.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:41 am
Posts: 557
pizza_Place: Taco Bell Mexican Pizza
bigfan wrote:

About half of Obama' $125 mill political war chest is from Wall Street. With many $500K donations.
Romney has about $56 Mill total

Who is the Bankers choice?


Obama reappoints Bernanke
Bernanke does Wall Street's bidding
Wall Street pays Obama

That's WhiteAndProud explaining the 2012 election!

_________________
I love Terry Boers. I hate Tim Tebow. The fact that the former will die before the latter show what a cruel, unjust world we live in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43569
bigfan wrote:
About half of Obama' $125 mill political war chest is from Wall Street. With many $500K donations.
Romney has about $56 Mill total

Who is the Bankers choice?

The bankers choice is whoever they think is going to win.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
WhiteAndProud wrote:
No matter what else he did, He was responsible for bringing down ACORN and we should all be thankful for that. ACORN was made up of the most disgusting annoying people on the face of Earth and they all deserve to witness their children being raped and disemboweled. They were evil shakedown snakes who did not help a single person. They made Jesse Jackson look like a Saint.


The irony to this is you neglected (as Breitbart was famous for) to tell the entire story (truth). Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts. Breitbart and O'keefe were forced to turn over all unedited films they had which proved Acorns innocence. The damage had been done and Acorn had to close it doors. Breitbart was also behind the Shirley Sherrod fiasco a couple years ago. He cut a tape of a speech and edited up to make her look like a racist.

It may sound mean but I being honest. Breitbart was a lying piece of shit. Just because he died doesnt change that. Brietbarts TWEETS after Ted Kennedy passed away show what kind of guy he was.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts.

In what Courts was Acorn found "not guilty of any wrongdoing?"

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
WhiteAndProud wrote:
No matter what else he did, He was responsible for bringing down ACORN and we should all be thankful for that. ACORN was made up of the most disgusting annoying people on the face of Earth and they all deserve to witness their children being raped and disemboweled. They were evil shakedown snakes who did not help a single person. They made Jesse Jackson look like a Saint.


The irony to this is you neglected (as Breitbart was famous for) to tell the entire story (truth). Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts. Breitbart and O'keefe were forced to turn over all unedited films they had which proved Acorns innocence. The damage had been done and Acorn had to close it doors. Breitbart was also behind the Shirley Sherrod fiasco a couple years ago. He cut a tape of a speech and edited up to make her look like a racist.

It may sound mean but I being honest. Breitbart was a lying piece of shit. Just because he died doesnt change that. Brietbarts TWEETS after Ted Kennedy passed away show what kind of guy he was.

Image


Too soon!

Kennedy was a giant pile of shit, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
This guy was an absolute prick. Maher always had him on.

BTW, his father in law was Orson Bean.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:13 pm 
Big Chicagoan wrote:
I think Baby McNown had something to do with it. That guy is/was obsessed with Breitbart.

I was in my truck. I had nothing to do with it. Pretty easy to verify that I wasn't in LA :-)
(back to reading. 3 pages ought to be fun)


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:19 pm 
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Really wish there was a single candidate in this election that combines fiscally conservative policies without being a social nut job


I think a lot of people think like this. It's too bad really. Why can't a candidate do both, it sounds fairly easy.

His name was John Huntsman. And he's not enough of a social nut to get the nomination from the GOP.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Colonel Angus wrote:
This guy was an absolute prick. Maher always had him on.

BTW, his father in law was Orson Bean.


I always listen and believe everything that Maher says. That guy is one smart cookie who always plays it straight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
I like Maher and think he can be pretty funny but his ALS is unreal.

He can flop with a joke and follow it with a Bush sucks...and the place goes nuts.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Really wish there was a single candidate in this election that combines fiscally conservative policies without being a social nut job


I think a lot of people think like this. It's too bad really. Why can't a candidate do both, it sounds fairly easy.

His name was John Huntsman. And he's not enough of a social nut to get the nomination from the GOP.


You think Pawlenty is kicking himself for dropping out of the race early?

Cain, Santorum, Bachmann and Will She, Won't She Palin? WTF?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
bigfan wrote:
I like Maher and think he can be pretty funny but his ALS is unreal.

He can flop with a joke and follow it with a Bush sucks...and the place goes nuts.

Dead on.

Maher also has a way of lulling you into a false sense of security and then springing something totally batshit on you, like how he doesn't believe in vaccinations. Then you're just like "wait whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"

Oh, and Breitbart was an irresponsible dope, but far less insidious than a great deal of conservatives.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group