It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 12:41 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The Free Agent pool has now been defined -- so the questions is, which receiver should the Bears get?

Vincent Jackson
Reggie Wayne
Marques Colston
Robert Meachem
Mario Manningham
Laurent Robinson
Mike Wallace
Pierre Garcon

OR, Draft

Michael Floyd
Alshon Jeffery
Kendall Wright


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Sign Colston
Draft Stephen Hill

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Laurent Robinson....only to find he is one of Hurd's associates AFTER he signs the contract.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Free Agent pool has now been defined -- so the questions is, which receiver should the Bears get?

Vincent Jackson
Reggie Wayne
Marques Colston
Robert Meachem
Mario Manningham
Laurent Robinson
Mike Wallace
Pierre Garcon

OR, Draft

Michael Floyd
Alshon Jeffery
Kendall Wright

ALL 3


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Vincent Jackson would probably be the biggest addition. Mike Wallace is really good also but doesn't complement the rest of the WR corps so it only makes sense to get him if you're gonna add another slot possession guy since they already have Knox.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Home Run
Vincent Jackson
Marques Colston
Mike Wallace

Decent
Robert Meachem
Reggie Wayne

Failure
Mario Manningham
Laurent Robinson
Pierre Garcon


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
FavreFan wrote:
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.


So was Moose. That's not saying much. He still isn't a #1

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Colston isn't a vertical threat... wouldn't help as much as the others. I like Garcon a lot, lately.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.


So was Moose. That's not saying much. He still isn't a #1

Moose was old. Manningham probably hasn't even reached his prime yet.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
Would the Bears owe Pittsburgh any draft picks for signing Wallace? I think they would, as he's a restricted FA I'm pretty sure.

I'd go for Vincent Jackson, though if the Bears wouldn't have to give up picks, Wallace would be 1A.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.

He'd be a good #2 I think.

Im just saying if thats what you come away with, you've failed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bucky Chris wrote:
Colston isn't a vertical threat... wouldn't help as much as the others. I like Garcon a lot, lately.

Not sure how much they need a vertical threat

A HUGE reciever with sure hands seems like just what the Doctor ordered.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.


So was Moose. That's not saying much. He still isn't a #1

Moose was old. Manningham probably hasn't even reached his prime yet.


You don't spend a lot of money on an unknown guy because of a catch in the SB. We've seen how that turns out. Wallace and Jackson should be their #1 targets.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Ed_from_Lisle wrote:
Would the Bears owe Pittsburgh any draft picks for signing Wallace? I think they would, as he's a restricted FA I'm pretty sure.

I'd go for Vincent Jackson, though if the Bears wouldn't have to give up picks, Wallace would be 1A.


They would give up their first round draft pick. So, in essense, the Bears would be drafting Wallace in the first round.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.

He'd be a good #2 I think.

Im just saying if thats what you come away with, you've failed.

Meacham is a #2 also, and I don't think Wayne has much left. I'd rather have Manningham than either of those two.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.

He'd be a good #2 I think.

Im just saying if thats what you come away with, you've failed.


I agree

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Ed_from_Lisle wrote:
Would the Bears owe Pittsburgh any draft picks for signing Wallace? I think they would, as he's a restricted FA I'm pretty sure.

I'd go for Vincent Jackson, though if the Bears wouldn't have to give up picks, Wallace would be 1A.


They would give up their first round draft pick. So, in essense, the Bears would be drafting Wallace in the first round.


Thanks for the info.

I doubt a new GM would be willing to give up his first #1 pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
You don't spend a lot of money on an unknown guy because of a catch in the SB. We've seen how that turns out. Wallace and Jackson should be their #1 targets.

I don't think Manningham will get a lot of money, and he's not an unknown. He's been good before that catch. And it's not fair to compare him to Santonio. They are completely different players, and more importantly, completely different people. Santonio had the talent to be a good #1.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Ed_from_Lisle wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Ed_from_Lisle wrote:
Would the Bears owe Pittsburgh any draft picks for signing Wallace? I think they would, as he's a restricted FA I'm pretty sure.

I'd go for Vincent Jackson, though if the Bears wouldn't have to give up picks, Wallace would be 1A.


They would give up their first round draft pick. So, in essense, the Bears would be drafting Wallace in the first round.


Thanks for the info.

I doubt a new GM would be willing to give up his first #1 pick.


The Bears won't have to give up their #1 pick to sign Wallace.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Failure is a little rough to describe acquiring Manningham. I understand why you say that, but he's a good starting WR and would instantly be their best receiving option.

He'd be a good #2 I think.

Im just saying if thats what you come away with, you've failed.

Meacham is a #2 also, and I don't think Wayne has much left. I'd rather have Manningham than either of those two.

I think Meacham has number #1 type potential.

I think Wayne has one or two good years left. If you get Wayne then you HAVE to take a WR in the 1st rd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
HOVA wrote:
The Bears won't have to give up their #1 pick to sign Wallace.


I just heard they would if Pittsburgh doesn't match the Bears' offer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Ed_from_Lisle wrote:
HOVA wrote:
The Bears won't have to give up their #1 pick to sign Wallace.


I just heard they would if Pittsburgh doesn't match the Bears' offer.

I heard this as well yesterday.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I don't know if they will go with Jackson because of his issues. I could see Colston or Wallace.

Mario Williams is tempting but I'd like to see them go WR in FA and defense in the draft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Bucky Chris wrote:
Colston isn't a vertical threat... wouldn't help as much as the others. I like Garcon a lot, lately.

Colston is your proven "Go Up and Get it Guy" WR
Bennett is your Possession WR
Knox is your burner WR
Stephen Hill is your "Go up + Speed" WR
Hester is the "Decoy" WR
Sanzenbacher is your "Waddle Wannabe" WR


There you have it.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
manningham is just a guy ...the last guy to make an amazing catch in the super bowl from eli was out of the league 18 months later...wallace or colston would be great if they draft floyd..the bears need a big tight end.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I tend to agree about Manningham. I don't think Garcon is what they need. Is Knox coming back?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
i hope knox does not come back..he is not good

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:27 pm
Posts: 2251
pizza_Place: Gino's East - Pepperoni & Garlic Deep Dish
312player wrote:
manningham is just a guy ...the last guy to make an amazing catch in the super bowl from eli was out of the league 18 months later...wallace or colston would be great if they draft floyd..the bears need a big tight end.

Don't we all?

_________________
Second City Saint


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
312player wrote:
i hope knox does not come back..he is not good


Yep. And I think he'll be worse because of that hit either because of injury or hearing footsteps.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Franky T, RFDC, USA and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group