It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:09 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55998
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Hmm, Dan and Terry get lots of free White Sox stuff.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33070
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Curious Hair wrote:
Hmm, Dan and Terry get lots of free White Sox stuff.


The Orioles got some real good gifts last night too....when I read that the closer almost had strike 3 on a 2-2 count, I bet Hawk went nuts!

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
denisdman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Hmm, Dan and Terry get lots of free White Sox stuff.


The Orioles got some real good gifts last night too....when I read that the closer almost had strike 3 on a 2-2 count, I bet Hawk went nuts!


Yarr. And this segue from "We don't understand/give a shit about hockey" to "black guy hats/irreverent Terry sounds" was less than smooth, but much needed.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:
Darkside wrote:
denisdman wrote:

I was being sarcastic....I was saying every sport is random. Otherwise computers would play the game.

Oh I got you DDman. I was just running with it and taking a shot at my main man Burn Stine.


Take your shots, I am on this bandwagon. It is well documented here how much I can't stand him. But people are right, he is just doing it to rile everyone up.

You arent even listening and he got you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33070
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
rogers park bryan wrote:
denisdman wrote:

Take your shots, I am on this bandwagon. It is well documented here how much I can't stand him. But people are right, he is just doing it to rile everyone up.

You arent even listening and he got you!


I was thinking the same thing. But I love reading the stuff you guys post here. It puts a smile on my face rather than getting me angry!

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
denisdman wrote:

Take your shots, I am on this bandwagon. It is well documented here how much I can't stand him. But people are right, he is just doing it to rile everyone up.

You arent even listening and he got you!


I was thinking the same thing. But I love reading the stuff you guys post here. It puts a smile on my face rather than getting me angry!

I know what you mean


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79592
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[. Just last week in discussing the 20th anniversary somebody mentioned the contentious North-Isiah Thomas interview as a Score classic. That was when North acted as if they were both players.

Details please


It was a long time ago so I don't remember exactly, but North got aggressive with Isiah in the interview. North has his ideas about hoops. He overvalues the skills he believes he has. He tried to frame the discussion as if he was a guy who played the game. Mike North thinks because he can pop a three at the Park Ridge senior center it's the same as hitting one with a "bad" defender like Micheal Ray Richardson on him.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 1073
8675309 wrote:
Dan knows that the Blackhawks are a lot closer to the 3rd most popular team in Chicago than the 5th so pretending they don't exist is no longer an option.


No, they are the 5th. If there were more foreigners in Chicago they would be behind the Fire. Or more 6' Lesbians they would be behind the Sky.
1) Bears
2) Bulls or Cubs
3) Cubs or Bulls
4) White Sox
5) Hawks

People jumped on bandwagon when they won, now it is emptying quickly.

_________________
good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
there is different kinds of smart..book/street .


the victory cry of low achievers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Vincent Antonelli wrote:
8675309 wrote:
Dan knows that the Blackhawks are a lot closer to the 3rd most popular team in Chicago than the 5th so pretending they don't exist is no longer an option.


No, they are the 5th. If there were more foreigners in Chicago they would be behind the Fire. Or more 6' Lesbians they would be behind the Sky.
1) Bears
2) Bulls or Cubs
3) Cubs or Bulls
4) White Sox
5) Hawks

People jumped on bandwagon when they won, now it is emptying quickly.


Bulls and Hawks are 4 and 5. Come on now with the Bulls being 2nd in the city. After the Bears it rotates on who is good, if the Bulls didn't get Rose no one would be watching and same with the Hawks if they sucked.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Judging by most of you guys' posts, this has been a really bad show so far.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Judging by most of you guys' posts, this has been a really bad show so far.


Yeah, sadly.

*Sigh* The decline continues.

I'm punching out.

Going to make some green tea and play some Rome:Total War.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 1073
Northside_Dan wrote:
Vincent Antonelli wrote:
8675309 wrote:
Dan knows that the Blackhawks are a lot closer to the 3rd most popular team in Chicago than the 5th so pretending they don't exist is no longer an option.


No, they are the 5th. If there were more foreigners in Chicago they would be behind the Fire. Or more 6' Lesbians they would be behind the Sky.
1) Bears
2) Bulls or Cubs
3) Cubs or Bulls
4) White Sox
5) Hawks

People jumped on bandwagon when they won, now it is emptying quickly.


Bulls and Hawks are 4 and 5. Come on now with the Bulls being 2nd in the city. After the Bears it rotates on who is good, if the Bulls didn't get Rose no one would be watching and same with the Hawks if they sucked.



And if any of us had lives this board would be empty. They do have Rose and they are good so interest in them is high now. Point that we agree on is Hawks are 5th, not close to cracking the top 3 unless they make the finals.

_________________
good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
there is different kinds of smart..book/street .


the victory cry of low achievers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55998
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Yeah, I'm out for the day. I'm going to get some work done and then go running, get this nervous energy out of my system.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65804
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
"Kids will one day just think of Paul Newman as the Salad Dressing guy."


:roll:

to use a Burn Stine-ism, I'm going to go microwave my head.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
This is an easy list to make. Just by looking at television ratings, it's an easy choice.

1. Bears
2. Bulls
3. Cubs
4. Sox
5. Hawks

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79592
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Douchebag wrote:
This is an easy list to make. Just by looking at television ratings, it's an easy choice.

1. Bears
2. Bulls
3. Cubs
4. Sox
5. Hawks


How can we compare television ratings when the supply of games for each is so radically different?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
This is an easy list to make. Just by looking at television ratings, it's an easy choice.

1. Bears
2. Bulls
3. Cubs
4. Sox
5. Hawks


How can we compare television ratings when the supply of games for each is so radically different?

I'll let Rick take this one.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
This is an easy list to make. Just by looking at television ratings, it's an easy choice.

1. Bears
2. Bulls
3. Cubs
4. Sox
5. Hawks


How can we compare television ratings when the supply of games for each is so radically different?


Arithmetic Mean and price for 30-seconds of commercial air-time are two different factors, which I'm quite confident would support the provided list above (never mind common sense/deductive reasoning).

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
I wonder if Cowley got his sense of taste back what with his tongue not up Ozzie's asshole nearly as much ....

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79592
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
This is an easy list to make. Just by looking at television ratings, it's an easy choice.

1. Bears
2. Bulls
3. Cubs
4. Sox
5. Hawks


How can we compare television ratings when the supply of games for each is so radically different?


Arithmetic Mean and price for 30-seconds of commercial air-time are two different factors, which I'm quite confident would support the provided list above (never mind common sense/deductive reasoning).



Huh? Obviously airtime is going to cost more when you provide more eyeballs.

I suppose if you want to use such ratings to compare the Bulls and the Hawks who have very similar schedules at the same time of the year, it may be germane. I certainly don't think the Bulls are more popular than either Chicago baseball team.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Don Tiny wrote:
I wonder if Cowley got his sense of taste back what with his tongue not up Ozzie's asshole nearly as much ....

Well, he's on right now in place of "The Second Half"...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
SHARK wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
I wonder if Cowley got his sense of taste back what with his tongue not up Ozzie's asshole nearly as much ....

Well, he's on right now in place of "The Second Half"...


Joe Cowley makes me wish Larry Holmes was on the blower.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Don Tiny wrote:
SHARK wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
I wonder if Cowley got his sense of taste back what with his tongue not up Ozzie's asshole nearly as much ....

Well, he's on right now in place of "The Second Half"...


Joe Cowley makes me wish Larry Holmes was on the blower.

He doesn't like being called Larry! "Mr. Multimedia" or "Mr. Overexposed" might be more appropriate for that guy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


Huh? Obviously airtime is going to cost more when you provide more eyeballs.

I suppose if you want to use such ratings to compare the Bulls and the Hawks who have very similar schedules at the same time of the year, it may be germane. I certainly don't think the Bulls are more popular than either Chicago baseball team.

Cubs, Sox, and Bulls are probably interchange based on current success of the teams. Right now, both baseball teams have zero prospects for this season, so I would rank them below Bulls.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79592
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Douchebag wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


Huh? Obviously airtime is going to cost more when you provide more eyeballs.

I suppose if you want to use such ratings to compare the Bulls and the Hawks who have very similar schedules at the same time of the year, it may be germane. I certainly don't think the Bulls are more popular than either Chicago baseball team.

Cubs, Sox, and Bulls are probably interchange based on current success of the teams. Right now, both baseball teams have zero prospects for this season, so I would rank them below Bulls.


At lot of people think the Bulls have zero prospects for the season.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
From a % of games watched of a total season (for any particular individual) I would think the Bulls and Hawks get more views than the Cubs and Sox. I certainly watch more Hockey and Basketball than Baseball...and I'm more of a fan of Baseball than Hockey and Basketball....
However, if you asked some random girl off the street who her favorite Chicago Sports Team is, the answer will be Cubs or Bears 90% of the time, depending on the season.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
SHARK wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Cowley makes me wish Larry Holmes was on the blower.

He doesn't like being called Larry! "Mr. Multimedia" or "Mr. Overexposed" might be more appropriate for that guy!


Image

(... blacker than Holmes could ever drink himself into thinking he is ...)

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Don Tiny wrote:
SHARK wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Cowley makes me wish Larry Holmes was on the blower.

He doesn't like being called Larry! "Mr. Multimedia" or "Mr. Overexposed" might be more appropriate for that guy!


Image

Moment of silence please for McLean Stevenson...Thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92108
Location: To the left of my post
Let me point out once again, that the championship with by far the least amount of randomness to it is the college football championship known as the BCS. Would Bernstein say that is better than the significantly more random NFL playoffs?

Oh, but Bernstein hates the spread offense so that one sucks too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Burn Stine on Shaw
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
I turned it back on....

So the Bulls aren't D-Roses primary employer?

Deng should sit for the rest of the year so he can get healthy for the next season?

Bulls talk brought to you buy: WTF.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group