Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic - Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » GENERAL BULLSHIT SECTION » MOVIES & TV

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Page 2 of 3

[ 63 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:46 pm

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!

Douchebag wrote:

donspiracy wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Die Hard (although the 3rd one was good)
Anchorman (pre-emptive)

A Good Day To Die Hard- Valentines Day 2013

http://www.movieweb.com/news/a-good-day ... 13-release

Oh god, please no.

I think some make-you-think irony would be for Bruce Willis to die in the final movie with a rock solid erection.

_________________
You know me like that.

Top

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:48 pm

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Die Hard (although the 3rd one was good)

I'd argue that Die Hard With a Vengeance was as good or possibly better than the original. Samuel L. Jackson helped a lot with that.

That's crazy talk.

_________________
You know me like that.

Top

RFDC

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:49 pm

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Die Hard (although the 3rd one was good)

I'd argue that Die Hard With a Vengeance was as good or possibly better than the original. Samuel L. Jackson helped a lot with that.

That's crazy talk.

Do you live in Boston?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.

Top

Telegram Sam

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:04 pm

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon

My Left Foot II: What's This Now? Leprosy? Terrific, Now I've Got Leprosy. Lovely. Just Great.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost

Top

Hank Scorpio

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:22 pm

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios

Douchebag, KI and OKC are all crazy. DH3 was good but to say it was better than the original is just silly talk.

_________________

drinky wrote:

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

Top

Krazy Ivan

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:25 pm

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Douchebag, KI and OKC are all crazy. DH3 was good but to say it was better than the original is just silly talk.

It was much better. Better writing. Better action.

There are rare times where the sequal is better than the original. Empire Strikes Back and Godfather II come to mind...

_________________
This is my signature...

Top

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:29 pm

Better writing?

Didn't he get blown out of a sewer pipe 150 feet in the air and jump off a bridge onto a barge?

_________________
You know me like that.

Top

Telegram Sam

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:30 pm

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon

Jeremy Irons.

Muscle T.

No More Questions.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost

Top

Hank Scorpio

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:31 pm

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios

Krazy Ivan wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Douchebag, KI and OKC are all crazy. DH3 was good but to say it was better than the original is just silly talk.

It was much better. Better writing. Better action.

There are rare times where the sequal is better than the original. Empire Strikes Back and Godfather II come to mind...

I agree with Empire and Godfather II. I cant get behind DH3 as better than the original. Much better villian in the first one and Bruce Willis was a little too indestructible in the 3rd one. At least in the first one he showed some signs of being a human. Are you telling me he did all that in the third movie on a 2 week binge hangover? Get real.

_________________

drinky wrote:

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

Top

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:31 pm

That's the other thing, Hans Gruber is a cinema legend.

I would guess that KI and OKC both saw Die Hard 3 before they saw Die Hard.

_________________
You know me like that.

Top

Hank Scorpio

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:32 pm

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios

Knowing that the good Doctor is on my side here makes me feel much better about my stance. He likely feels the opposite.

_________________

drinky wrote:

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

Top

Telegram Sam

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:34 pm

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Knowing that the good Doctor is on my side here makes me feel much better about my stance. He likely feels the opposite.

I wonder how he feels about a nice robust thicket in the nether regions?

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost

Top

Krazy Ivan

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:39 pm

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

That's the other thing, Hans Gruber is a cinema legend.

I would guess that KI and OKC both saw Die Hard 3 before they saw Die Hard.

Incorrect.

You. Me. Cairo. Die Hard With A Vengance on laser disk. Malted balls. Unmalted balls. Two folding chairs. One cup.

_________________
This is my signature...

Top

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:39 pm

Telegram Sam wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Knowing that the good Doctor is on my side here makes me feel much better about my stance. He likely feels the opposite.

I wonder how he feels about a nice robust thicket in the nether regions?

Usually with my hands. Sometimes I use my elbow...just to be eccentric.

_________________
You know me like that.

Top

Don Tiny

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:41 pm

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Die Hard (although the 3rd one was good)

I'd argue that Die Hard With a Vengeance was as good or possibly better than the original. Samuel L. Jackson helped a lot with that.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George

Top

Douchebag

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:42 pm

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566

_________________

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

Top

Telegram Sam

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:43 pm

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Telegram Sam wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Knowing that the good Doctor is on my side here makes me feel much better about my stance. He likely feels the opposite.

I wonder how he feels about a nice robust thicket in the nether regions?

Usually with my hands. Sometimes I use my elbow...just to be eccentric.

Hank likes his ladies to look as though they just smuggled Leo Sayer through customs.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost

Top

Krazy Ivan

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:48 pm

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen

Don Tiny wrote:

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Die Hard (although the 3rd one was good)

I'd argue that Die Hard With a Vengeance was as good or possibly better than the original. Samuel L. Jackson helped a lot with that.

_________________
This is my signature...

Top

Douchebag

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:01 pm

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566

To go along with sequels that were better, Lethal Weapon IV FTW.

_________________

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

Top

The Original Kid Cairo

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:29 pm

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut

Douchebag wrote:

To go along with sequels that were better, Lethal Weapon IV FTW.

Nah, I think 1 was the best, followed closely by 2.

Lethal Weapon Rankings:

1. Part 1
2. Part 2
3. Part 4
4. Part 3 (not very good at all)

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"

Top

Colonel Angus

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:50 pm

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's

312player wrote:

meet the parents

Meet the Fockers was better than Meet the Parents. Didn't see the third, really don't want to.

Top

The Original Kid Cairo

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:54 pm

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut

Colonel Angus wrote:

312player wrote:

meet the parents

Meet the Fockers was better than Meet the Parents. Didn't see the third, really don't want to.

I saw Little Fockers. It really didn't need to be made, honestly. It wasn't horrible or anything. Just completely unnecessary.

Top

Colonel Angus

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:59 pm

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Colonel Angus wrote:

312player wrote:

meet the parents

Meet the Fockers was better than Meet the Parents. Didn't see the third, really don't want to.

I saw Little Fockers. It really didn't need to be made, honestly. It wasn't horrible or anything. Just completely unnecessary.

I'm sure DeNiro needed it to add another wing to his mansion.

Top

Jaw Breaker

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:56 pm

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16474
pizza_Place: Boni Vino

I guess I'm in the minority with Die Hard...the original is the best, but I enjoyed 2: Die Harder.

My vote:
2001: A Space Odyssey

_________________

To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:

Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?

Top

chaspoppcap

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 6:35 am

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know

Jaw Breaker wrote:

I guess I'm in the minority with Die Hard...the original is the best, but I enjoyed 2: Die Harder.

My vote:
2001: A Space Odyssey

Die Hard is a classic,should have stopped after it but the sequels where mostly okay.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"

Top

312player

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:58 am

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's

have to take your word on that, i could only manage about 8 minutes of it...i hate bette midler and hoffman is not funny...good actor but not funny. the first meet the parents was outstanding

_________________

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.

Top

Douchebag

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:03 am

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566

Colonel Angus wrote:

312player wrote:

meet the parents

Meet the Fockers was better than Meet the Parents.

You might be the first person I have ever heard with this opinion.

I thought the first one was great, and it still has that Shawshank appeal that I will still put it on TV when it's on.

The second one was awful.

_________________

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

Top

Hank Scorpio

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:30 am

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios

312player wrote:

have to take your word on that, i could only manage about 8 minutes of it...i hate bette midler and hoffman is not funny...good actor but not funny. the first meet the parents was outstanding

What does Bette Midler have to do with Meet the Fockers?

_________________

drinky wrote:

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

Top

The Original Kid Cairo

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:31 am

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut

He meant Streisand.

It's all Jewish to me.

Top

Krazy Ivan

Post subject: Re: Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:31 am

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen

Hank Scorpio wrote:

312player wrote:

have to take your word on that, i could only manage about 8 minutes of it...i hate bette midler and hoffman is not funny...good actor but not funny. the first meet the parents was outstanding

What does Bette Midler have to do with Meet the Fockers?

He's mixing it up with Rochell, Rochelle.

_________________
This is my signature...

Top

Page 2 of 3

[ 63 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

Movies That Should Not Have Had A Sequel

Who is online