doesn't surprise me though
no matter how many people i know that i have things in common with, there's always a few things where i'll be on the other side of the fence completely.
what did you hate about "28 days later"? i thought it was a refreshing film, not a "zombie" film but rather more like a social commentary on the dronish culture we've come to; and much like romero's "dawn of the dead", the zombies served the plot, they didn't define it. "28 weeks later" takes it further, where "days" flirted with the question of who our real enemy is and who creates the chaos--since the virus iteself was imposed by humans. "weeks" basically dives into mass hysteria, and really hits the question hard of "who the enemy is". there is a line that is blurred, where infecteds and regular humans are the enemies against the main characters.
i think the message is clearer in "28 days later" but I think it's much harsher in "28 weeks later".
i don't think either film has been intended as a straight up horror flick; so for those who were expecting that, i can understand the disappointment.
however, if you didn't look at either as a horror flick but still had problems with it, i'd like to hear the criticisms.