It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Apologist wrote:
I'm pretty sure that he was referring to .300 being about MLB- average, year in and year out.

Of course there are wild variations, some guys are able to sustain high BABIPs over multiple seasons and careers. I don't think anyone is referring to them as "lucky".

Last time I looked into it, LaHair had a ridiculous BABIP. I don't think he's lucky, the guy is hitting rockets all over the diamond. Whether or not he can sustain it, is a different question...



But on the pitcher side I think they all allow close to .300. I believe Warren Spahn is an example of a guy with a consistently lower than normal BABIP against.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
JOOR, if you are a coach and Pujols is comng to bat and you see Pujols has grounded out to the LF side 25 times this year and NONE to the right side. And NONE even up the middle. Are you leaving the 2B in his normal position?

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/player/albert-pujols/hitchart/85809?q=albert-pujols

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Another, Freddie Freeman, not one ground ball to the left side this year. So the Cubs played Castro behind 2nd the whole series. 2 big outs on grounders up the middle that are probably singles otherwise.

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/player/freddie-freeman/hitchart/745177?q=freddie-freeman

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
I don't listen to Bernstein regularly by any means. My gut tells me that he uses SABR-like stats because it reinforces his narrative of being an "intelligent fan". In all reality, the advanced stats lie as often as the traditional ones- except that the old school fan is less likely to understand them well enough to refute whatever rhetoric Bernstein is spewing.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Apologist wrote:
I don't listen to Bernstein regularly by any means. My gut tells me that he uses SABR-like stats because it reinforces his narrative of being an "intelligent fan". In all reality, the advanced stats lie as often as the traditional ones- except that the old school fan is less likely to understand them well enough to refute whatever rhetoric Bernstein is spewing.


Well, it's pretty hard to dispute stats in general. That is, unless your using other stats. The benefit Bernstein has is that "the guy who watches every game" will never have better evidence than what the stats suggest.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But on the pitcher side I think they all allow close to .300. I believe Warren Spahn is an example of a guy with a consistently lower than normal BABIP against.


Matt Cain comes to mind- a guy with flyball tendencies that somehow limits HRs [ATT Park effect?]. Cain's career BABIP is .262 and has never exceeding .297 in any season.

I suspect that Spahn may have also thrown a fair amount of high fastballs- balls that are outright whiffed, or hit weekly in the air. Some of that high heat is bound to leave the yard. Fortunately for Warren( and Cain), a home run is not considered a "ball in play".

Whatever the reasons, these new stats are just a way to look at the game through a different lens. Matt Cain has a career W-L of 70-75, he can probably thank SABRmetrics at least a bit, for his recent $20M+ extension.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 10:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
bigfan wrote:
JOOR, if you are a coach and Pujols is comng to bat and you see Pujols has grounded out to the LF side 25 times this year and NONE to the right side. And NONE even up the middle. Are you leaving the 2B in his normal position?

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/player/albert-pujols/hitchart/85809?q=albert-pujols


I'm not convinced that batted balls are random.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
JOOR, if you are a coach and Pujols is comng to bat and you see Pujols has grounded out to the LF side 25 times this year and NONE to the right side. And NONE even up the middle. Are you leaving the 2B in his normal position?

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/player/albert-pujols/hitchart/85809?q=albert-pujols


I'm not convinced that batted balls are random.


They aren't. Ironically, one of the unwritten canons of SABRmetrics is taking the "randomness" out of the game by attempting to understand the effectiveness of certain players by using new rate-based metrics and traditional "counting" stats alike.

Ichiro Suzuki is probably a HOF singles hitter, and has been lauded by even traditional scouts as a guy lauded for his uncanny ability to loft sand-wedge like bloops just over the infield. Last year he hit .272, by far his worst year in MLB. His BABIP of.295 would be considered league average, but was easily the lowest of his career.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
JOOR, if you are a coach and Pujols is comng to bat and you see Pujols has grounded out to the LF side 25 times this year and NONE to the right side. And NONE even up the middle. Are you leaving the 2B in his normal position?

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/player/albert-pujols/hitchart/85809?q=albert-pujols


I'm not convinced that batted balls are random.

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16457
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Quote:
when we say BABIP "normalizes" at .300 are we saying that over enough at-bats every pitcher will have pretty close to a .300 BABIP against and every hitter will have close to a .300 BABIP?


My understanding is that BABIP is very consistent across pitchers (hence the great interest in studying fielder-independent pitching) but can vary widely among batters. In other words, the standard deviation is higher for batters.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 1:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Quote:
when we say BABIP "normalizes" at .300 are we saying that over enough at-bats every pitcher will have pretty close to a .300 BABIP against and every hitter will have close to a .300 BABIP?


My understanding is that BABIP is very consistent across pitchers (hence the great interest in studying fielder-independent pitching) but can vary widely among batters. In other words, the standard deviation is higher for batters.


Yeah, that's what I thought. The thing is, I can't believe that a guy like Buehrle was "lucky" enough to face the minimum twice with average defenses behind him and a relatively low number of strikeouts in each game. I have to conclude that, at least within the space of those two games, Buehrle was having a greater than normal effect on where balls were hit, thus, the possibility exists for a pitcher to do so over a career even if it has never really occurred in practice.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91919
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, that's what I thought. The thing is, I can't believe that a guy like Buehrle was "lucky" enough to face the minimum twice with average defenses behind him and a relatively low number of strikeouts in each game. I have to conclude that, at least within the space of those two games, Buehrle was having a greater than normal effect on where balls were hit, thus, the possibility exists for a pitcher to do so over a career even if it has never really occurred in practice.
No. Greg Maddux was not that good.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 1:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, that's what I thought. The thing is, I can't believe that a guy like Buehrle was "lucky" enough to face the minimum twice with average defenses behind him and a relatively low number of strikeouts in each game. I have to conclude that, at least within the space of those two games, Buehrle was having a greater than normal effect on where balls were hit, thus, the possibility exists for a pitcher to do so over a career even if it has never really occurred in practice.
No. Greg Maddux was not that good.



Interesting enough, Maddux was the basis for some of the crazy conclusions to which Voros McCracken immediately leaped based upon rather incomplete research he did while pioneering fielder independent pitching statistics.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RPB, you probably know more about this than I do

Not so fast. I dont wanna come off like a Bernstein. I try and keep up with these numbers and all the updates but im no expert on them overall. Most of the guys who do that for a job cant even be called experts. Its kind of a new-ish frontier



Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
, so when we say BABIP "normalizes" at .300 are we saying that over enough at-bats every pitcher will have pretty close to a .300 BABIP against and every hitter will have close to a .300 BABIP? Or is that for the entire league at a given time? I know the belief in randomness came out of the fact that BABIP varies wildly for individuals on a season-to-season basis.

Yeah, I believe it refers to the league overall with some exceptions. I think I wrote earleir, without looking it up Id have to guess Rivera's BAPIP is lower than most.

Sometimes these numbers conflict though.

I mean, if BAPIP averages out to 290-300 doesnt that suggest that making contact should be viewed as a good thing and strikeouts significantly worse?

But when you research it, the numbers bear out that the difference between strikeout and batted ball out, in terms of what leads to runs scored is so infinitesimal, that really there is no difference between the two.


We know way more now that we did 20 years ago, and in 10 years it will be the same


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Yeah, that's what I thought. The thing is, I can't believe that a guy like Buehrle was "lucky" enough to face the minimum twice with average defenses behind him and a relatively low number of strikeouts in each game. I have to conclude that, at least within the space of those two games, Buehrle was having a greater than normal effect on where balls were hit, thus, the possibility exists for a pitcher to do so over a career even if it has never really occurred in practice.
No. Greg Maddux was not that good.

Dont be silly


There is no dispute that a pitcher can affect how hard the ball is hit. Maddux and Buehrle are guys that lived on making guys pop up or hit something in a zone that was bad for the hitter.

That is the beauty of well hit ball ratiio and line drive percentage!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group