It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 11:40 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I agree. When every team had an old park, those were the two shittiest ones. Oddly, they are the two that survived.

Crazy talk. :lol:


Crazy talk? I remember the way parks were regarded. A few thousand people saw Ernie hit his 500th. Nobody ever said Wrigley was a great park in the 70s. And it was the same damn building it is now. Fenway was considered a miserable hellhole. What do you think changed? Certainly not the structures.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I don't know the author's reasoning behind writing the article - I took it to be rather tongue-in-cheek -


Probably to some degree. The same guy waxes poetic about the same park in his book, Lake Effect. It seems to me that the park never changes. The thing that changes is the people, where they are in their lives, and how they feel about it at a given time.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
spanky wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I agree. When every team had an old park, those were the two shittiest ones. Oddly, they are the two that survived.

Crazy talk. :lol:


Crazy talk? I remember the way parks were regarded. A few thousand people saw Ernie hit his 500th. Nobody ever said Wrigley was a great park in the 70s. And it was the same damn building it is now. Fenway was considered a miserable hellhole. What do you think changed? Certainly not the structures.

It's crazy to say that they were "the two shittiest ones". Especially if you are including as recently as the '70's

All of the cookie-cutters sucked. That thing in Cleveland was worse than all of those. Did you see the thing the Blue Jays used to play in? Old Comiskey was bad. How about the LA Coliseum? The Astrodome, while unique, was widely panned. I could keep going.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
It's crazy to say that they were "the two shittiest ones". Especially if you are including as recently as the '70's

All of the cookie-cutters sucked. That thing in Cleveland was worse than all of those. Did you see the thing the Blue Jays used to play in? Old Comiskey was bad. How about the LA Coliseum? The Astrodome, while unique, was widely panned. I could keep going.



I'm not talking about the so-called "cookie cutter" multi-purpose stadiums. I mean the old vintage parks, Crosley, Ebbets, Sportsman's, Shibe, Comiskey, Forbes.

Personally, I was never a big fan of Old Comiskey either so this isn't a Sox-Cubs thing. I never thought about the park. It was just a place I had a lot of good times. I wasn't particularly sorry to see it go. But the fact is that ballpark was considered leagues beyond Wrigley and Fenway when it was built and all the way up until it was gone. But people didn't fetishize ballparks the way they do now. It used to be just the place where your team played. Now it's a reason to attend a game.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
The only reason people need to use public transportation to get to Wrigley is because there is no parking there.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
I'm guessing most people with strong opinions on it actually attend very few games and would attend very few wherever they played.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Mini Ditka wrote:
The only reason people need to use public transportation to get to Wrigley is because there is no parking there.


You know what, you bring up a very good point, Mini-Ditka.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
SomeGuy wrote:
You know what, you bring up a very good point, Mini-Ditka.


Now you've done it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Arlington Heights is right by the Metra. What percentage of Cubs fans are actually from the city anyhow? Can you imagine the stupid ticket brokers camping out in Arlington Heights to buy tickets to resell for the season?

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55839
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
A considerable percentage, I'm sure. Chicago is a big city with lots of people in it! :)

Arlington Heights is on the Metra, yes, but if you're not on the northwest line, you have to go all the way into the West Loop on one line and back out on another, which is stupid and time-consuming and defeats the purpose of public transit as a comparatively relaxing and cost-effective alternative to driving someplace stressful, i.e. a place where 40,000 people are going. New Lenox is on the Metra. Shall we build a ballpark there?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Curious Hair wrote:
A considerable percentage, I'm sure. Chicago is a big city with lots of people in it! :)


How many people take public transportation to Sox games?

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55839
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I don't know. I don't really concern myself with the White Sox. Probably many, if so many Sox fans live in the city and don't have to pay for parking.

More people should take public transportation to games. It's smarter.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Curious Hair wrote:
I don't know. I don't really concern myself with the White Sox. Probably many, if so many Sox fans live in the city and don't have to pay for parking.

More people should take public transportation to games. It's smarter.


Who wants to ride the Red Line at night?

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Mini Ditka wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I don't know. I don't really concern myself with the White Sox. Probably many, if so many Sox fans live in the city and don't have to pay for parking.

More people should take public transportation to games. It's smarter.


Who wants to ride the Red Line at night?


Lots of people.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I don't know. I don't really concern myself with the White Sox. Probably many, if so many Sox fans live in the city and don't have to pay for parking.

More people should take public transportation to games. It's smarter.


Who wants to ride the Red Line at night?


Lots of people.


There are many more fans that drive than take public transportation. It's not like Wrigleyville where people are going to hang around after the game and soak in the neighborhood.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91917
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
Attendance would become much more closely tied to the fortunes of the team: fine enough for a winning team but Marlinesque for a losing team. As much as we all hate Chad and Trixie, having the park be what it is where it is prevents attendance from completely bottoming out, which it would for a bad team in a bad location.
Isn't that happening now though? Why are the Cubs seeing declining attendance now?

The thing is that the Cubs could become an economic powerhouse like the Yankees with a completely new stadium. More seats + private suites - the loss of the share they don't get for the rooftops + rent for a Cubs village + all the advertising they want anywhere they want + parking would be massive. Of course, some of that would have to go to other investors, and some of that would go to the city they now play in, but the Cubs could happily screw over any city they wanted in this. Add in a CUBS network and we are talking about being the Yankees of the NL.

The whole plan would rely on how many Cubs fans would give up on the Cubs because they now play in a new park. What are they going to do? Are they going to become White Sox fans and go to the South Side to avoid taking an express train from the Loop directly to the stadium?

Finally, if Wrigley Field is the only reason that the Cubs attendance isn't "Marlinesque" then the Cubs fan base isn't that good and my calculations are way off and a suburban stadium would fail. I guess Curious Hair buys into the "Cubs attendance is only good because of the park" crowd.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Mini Ditka wrote:
The only reason people need to use public transportation to get to Wrigley is because there is no parking there.

Parking is easily found if you're willing to walk a few blocks. (like 6)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
wrigley does need to be torn down...if you rehab it will suck...like soldier field.... and the red line is the best line to ride..it is almost always on time and runs every 6 minutes 24/7...

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Blow it up. Rebuild a new stadium on the same site with some things carried over from Wrigley and new amenities


In the year of construction split your games between the Cell and Miller Park




Or just wait for it to fall down


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 12:15 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The thing is that the Cubs could become an economic powerhouse like the Yankees with a completely new stadium. More seats + private suites - the loss of the share they don't get for the rooftops + rent for a Cubs village + all the advertising they want anywhere they want + parking would be massive. Of course, some of that would have to go to other investors, and some of that would go to the city they now play in, but the Cubs could happily screw over any city they wanted in this. Add in a CUBS network and we are talking about being the Yankees of the NL.

The whole plan would rely on how many Cubs fans would give up on the Cubs because they now play in a new park. What are they going to do? Are they going to become White Sox fans and go to the South Side to avoid taking an express train from the Loop directly to the stadium?

Finally, if Wrigley Field is the only reason that the Cubs attendance isn't "Marlinesque" then the Cubs fan base isn't that good and my calculations are way off and a suburban stadium would fail. I guess Curious Hair buys into the "Cubs attendance is only good because of the park" crowd.



They're not going to become an economic powerhouse by moving out to the suburbs when there's another team ten minutes from downtown in a rapidly gentrifying area that would quite likely begin siphoning off corporate accounts.

It's not that people will stop being Cub fans. It's that a lot of them will stop going to as many games. The family guy in the northwest suburbs just isn't going to make as many games as the guy two years out of Zeta Beta Tau who lives on the corner of Grace and Clifton. And that guys gets replaced every few years by another guy just like him. And I guarantee Japanese tourists in town for conventions aren't going to be rushing out to see the Schaumburg Cubs.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91917
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
They're not going to become an economic powerhouse by moving out to the suburbs when there's another team ten minutes from downtown in a rapidly gentrifying area that would quite likely begin siphoning off corporate accounts.
There are a lot of businesses in the suburbs too, and the fact is that at Wrigley they can't really cater to corporate accounts well anyways.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's not that people will stop being Cub fans. It's that a lot of them will stop going to as many games. The family guy in the northwest suburbs just isn't going to make as many games as the guy two years out of Zeta Beta Tau who lives on the corner of Grace and Clifton. And that guys gets replaced every few years by another guy just like him. And I guarantee Japanese tourists in town for conventions aren't going to be rushing out to see the Schaumburg Cubs.
Are they going to Bulls or Blackhawks games? Those two seem to do just fine without selling a stadium as the #1 attraction.

This is as much about the money left on the table at Wrigley. From the rooftops, to the lack of advertising, to the naming rights, to a lack of "luxury seats", to a lot of added revenue by having a piece of Cubs village the Cubs give up a ton of money.

It would be pretty sad if the only thing keeping the Cubs from being a financial catastrophe is that they have an older ballpark that people who don't care about the Cubs want to go to. Some people seem to think the Cubs couldn't work outside of Wrigley Field.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
You guys are immersed in Cubs business


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Are they going to Bulls or Blackhawks games? Those two seem to do just fine without selling a stadium as the #1 attraction.

This is as much about the money left on the table at Wrigley. From the rooftops, to the lack of advertising, to the naming rights, to a lack of "luxury seats", to a lot of added revenue by having a piece of Cubs village the Cubs give up a ton of money.

It would be pretty sad if the only thing keeping the Cubs from being a financial catastrophe is that they have an older ballpark that people who don't care about the Cubs want to go to. Some people seem to think the Cubs couldn't work outside of Wrigley Field.



There aren't alternatives to the Bulls and Blackhawks. You seem to think the Cubs sell all those corporate season tickets because they're the Cubs rather than the actual reason: that people like to go sit in the sunshine at beautiful antique Wrigley Field.

I think you're vastly overestimating the number of hardcore Cub fans that actually attend games. I doubt it's that much greater than what the Sox have. The Cubs make hay with the casual fan and those who want to go to beautiful Wrigley Field. Maybe we'll get a chance to see how it really works.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91917
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There aren't alternatives to the Bulls and Blackhawks. You seem to think the Cubs sell all those corporate season tickets because they're the Cubs rather than the actual reason: that people like to go sit in the sunshine at beautiful antique Wrigley Field.
Why would they go to the White Sox then? New Wrigley Field would likely be more beautiful than the Cell and many of those corporations aren't headquartered downtown.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think you're vastly overestimating the number of hardcore Cub fans that actually attend games. I doubt it's that much greater than what the Sox have. The Cubs make hay with the casual fan and those who want to go to beautiful Wrigley Field. Maybe we'll get a chance to see how it really works.
I can't argue with this. I may be overestimating how good the Cubs fanbase is. Anyone who says the Cubs should stay in Wrigley because Cubs fans can't fill the ballpark is not going to get an argument from me.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[
I think you're vastly overestimating the number of hardcore Cub fans that actually attend games. I doubt it's that much greater than what the Sox have. The Cubs make hay with the casual fan and those who want to go to beautiful Wrigley Field.

Thats how I always figured it. Both teams probably draw 15-20K real fans and the other 15 or so have to be sold by "Wrigley Baseball" "Half price Mondays" "Actual contending team"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 1:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why would they go to the White Sox then? New Wrigley Field would likely be more beautiful than the Cell and many of those corporations aren't headquartered downtown.


Well, assuming the beauty of a stadium that doesn't yet exist is a leap, but I'll allow it. :lol:

I think there is a two-pronged answer to this. The real power players that are being entertained probably enjoy going to dinner downtown and staying at a downtown hotel and Sox Park is just going to be more convenient. Then there are the people that just get a shot at the seats once or twice a year because nobody is using them. Lower level sales guys using them for clients- or pretending to use them for clients and taken their drunken buddies. I have to think there will be less of a scramble among those people to get tickets to Schaumburg Field. At first they'll already be bought, but I think it will become very easy for a guy making the call to say, "Can we spend that entertainment money better?"

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 1:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[
I think you're vastly overestimating the number of hardcore Cub fans that actually attend games. I doubt it's that much greater than what the Sox have. The Cubs make hay with the casual fan and those who want to go to beautiful Wrigley Field.

Thats how I always figured it. Both teams probably draw 15-20K real fans and the other 15 or so have to be sold by "Wrigley Baseball" "Half price Mondays" "Actual contending team"


I know we've had conversations here about what makes a fan. It can get really silly. But I'll probably make 5 or 6 games at Wrigley this season and I'd guess that's more than most guys who consider themselves "diehard Cubs fans".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91917
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, assuming the beauty of a stadium that doesn't yet exist is a leap, but I'll allow it. :lol:
As much as I like US Cellular, I don't think beautiful is a good description for it.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think there is a two-pronged answer to this. The real power players that are being entertained probably enjoy going to dinner downtown and staying at a downtown hotel and Sox Park is just going to be more convenient. Then there are the people that just get a shot at the seats once or twice a year because nobody is using them. Lower level sales guys using them for clients- or pretending to use them for clients and taken their drunken buddies. I have to think there will be less of a scramble among those people to get tickets to Schaumburg Field. At first they'll already be bought, but I think it will become very easy for a guy making the call to say, "Can we spend that entertainment money better?"
I'm only a normal guy, but all the corporate tickets I've ever gotten have been "Pick up 4 tickets at will call and have fun. Save the stubs and give them back to me". Also, I think the corporations would simply enjoy the better suites and amenities of a new stadium and many of the corporations in that area would probably enjoy easier access and parking(I know, parking is super easy at Wrigley).

I just see a Wrigleytown where the Cubs get a piece of all apartments, hotels, restaurants, bars, stores, parking and upgraded premium seating options and I don't see how the Cubs can't equal the Yankees in terms of money generated. Add in a Cubs network and they would simply outspend every other NL team.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
I don't know. It's possible you're right, I tend to think they'd just be another bad baseball team playing in a big suburban park with a lot of empty seats. We may get the chance to find out at some point.

I'm pretty sure that Tom Ricketts sees it the way I do, but I'd guess Big Joe doesn't and is likely pressuring his kid. We really won't know if the goose was golden until it's dead.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 1:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Was watching a movie the other day and it reminded me or something...

Anybody know-- without looking it up-- what the first night baseball game played in Wrigley was? Here's a hint, it wasn't in 1988.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group