It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 317 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
Theo has brought on an experienced staff to assist in player moves. He has heavily incorporated advanced stats and metrics into player decisions. Tim Wilken was given one more year to work with the new organization, which I feel he deserves. Based on reports, it seems like Theo and Hoyer have been working hard to try and make some solid moves leading up to the deadline...and it seems like the current players are fully on board.

The Sox' studs are getting holder. Are Viciedo and De Aza the stars going forward? With Beckham and Ramirez? Floyd and Danks came back down to earth...Humber isn't anything...Peavy is getting older and can get hurt again at any time...and the farm system is average at best, yes?

And money is always in favor of the Cubs.
If Elmhurst Steve had made this post we'd all be laughing, especially the part in bold.

So, basically the answer as to why the Cubs organization is going to be better than the White Sox is "We have Theo". Just come right out and say it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
So...this thread should be about the series. Neither team is playing particularly well. With the warm temps, balls could be flying out of the Cell left and right.


The Sox are better now, no question about it. Next year the Sox will probably still be better. After that, who knows. But in terms of "I would rather be the Cubs than the Sox in 5 years", there is a much better chance that the Sox win one (or maybe 2 :shock: :lol: ) WS in that timeframe than the Cubs.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
I love the Theo talk.

It's like watching the Moneyball movie. It's all super under the radar gems like Hatteberg and David Justice and getting walks but Chavez, Moulder,Zito, Hudson are all ignored.

"Advanced metrics", super secret algorithms so complex they have to be fed through a supercomputer stationed at the DoD, "SABRmetrics"....and the names Ramierez, Ortiz,Schilling, Nomar,Damon etc....and of course a HUGE FUCKING PAYROLL, all go by the wayside. It was all Doug Mientkiewicz and Gabe Kapler plus CARMINE oh and defensive placements that Theo called down from his pressbox/computer room.

And as for the Cubs/Sox series, who cares? Both teams aren't going anywhere. The Sox might, but probably not. It makes for a predictable day of sports radio, though.

Now I'm going to go stick my head in the oven.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
5 of the 9 everyday players are

AJ (36), King Konerko(36), Dunn (32), Rios (31), Hudson (35)
Assuming Dunn at least provides what he normally does, the only problem there is Rios. AJ can go at any time. Konerko probably goes from MVP candidate to above average, even if he gets an extension for a year or two. Hudson doesn't matter.

Even Rios only has 2 years after this.

The Sox also have some money to spend pretty much every year too with big contracts going away each of the next 3 years between $15 - $27 million. This is also a team that is paying $30 million less in payroll this year than they did last year. Hypothetically, Kenny could spend up to $60 million in added salary in 2015 or $45 million next year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
.
rogers park bryan wrote:
They have a Team president who has been extremely successful
So do the Sox.

Theo Nathan Epstein
839-619 .575 Winning pct
93.22 wins per season
6 of 9 seasons in playoffs
2 World Series Titles


Kenneth Royal Williams
929-854 .521 Winning pct
84.45 Wins per season
2 of 10 Seasons in playoffs
1 World Series title



Not sure you can call Kenny Extremely successful.

A little above average


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
5 of the 9 everyday players are

AJ (36), King Konerko(36), Dunn (32), Rios (31), Hudson (35)
Assuming Dunn at least provides what he normally does, the only problem there is Rios. AJ can go at any time. Konerko probably goes from MVP candidate to above average, even if he gets an extension for a year or two. Hudson doesn't matter.

Even Rios only has 2 years after this.

The Sox also have some money to spend pretty much every year too with big contracts going away each of the next 3 years between $15 - $27 million. This is also a team that is paying $30 million less in payroll this year than they did last year. Hypothetically, Kenny could spend up to $60 million in added salary in 2015 or $45 million next year.

Sure, Im not sayinig they're screwed. But they DO have some guys to replace very soon and without looking Id wager they are one of the older teams in the league. Starting 9 anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
It isn't a blind guess. I like the Cubs' front office (personnel and approach) more than I like the Sox'. I think the base is being created for extended success on the North side. I like that better than then patchwork organization the Sox always put together... I mean, c'mon...the team is only 4 games over .500. They aren't world beaters.

Since Theo has taken over, if you compared his personnel moves with Kenny's in the same time period, why do you believe Theo has done the better job? What about the Cubs base do you like more than the Sox base?

Theo has brought on an experienced staff to assist in player moves. He has heavily incorporated advanced stats and metrics into player decisions. Tim Wilken was given one more year to work with the new organization, which I feel he deserves. Based on reports, it seems like Theo and Hoyer have been working hard to try and make some solid moves leading up to the deadline...and it seems like the current players are fully on board.

The Sox' studs are getting holder. Are Viciedo and De Aza the stars going forward? With Beckham and Ramirez? Floyd and Danks came back down to earth...Humber isn't anything...Peavy is getting older and can get hurt again at any time...and the farm system is average at best, yes?

And money is always in favor of the Cubs.

Well I'd rather have Chris Sale than any player in the Cubs organization going forward. I can only assume you purposely omitted him. Konerko is playing great for being 36 and Dunn doesn't look like he is slowing down. As brick said, Peavy will be gone. I dont think anyone can say the book is written on Floyd or Danks. Addison Reed seems promising as a closer also. I have no knowledge of their farm system but I'll agree that it's average at best.

On the other hand you have a historically bad Cub team, with little hope outside of Starlin on the roster now. As brick has been saying, you are basically saying you would rather be the worst team in baseball and hope to luck out with draft picks, and then throw money at the roster. The problem is, from what I can tell, teams that build through the draft and are starting at rock bottom take awhile. Rays, Nats, O's(maybe?) come to mind. If you miss on your David Price, Longoria, or Bryce Harper it may take even longer. But the Cubs have additional revenue at their disposal you would say. I don't really know how big an advantage that is. Henry had that revenue at his disposal. Theo's weakness, if he has one as a GM, would seem to be on the proper allocation of money from a big budget to free agents. I'm not sure that's a cause for optimism.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
.
rogers park bryan wrote:
They have a Team president who has been extremely successful
So do the Sox.

Theo Nathan Epstein
839-619 .575 Winning pct
93.22 wins per season
6 of 9 seasons in playoffs
2 World Series Titles


Kenneth Royal Williams
929-854 .521 Winning pct
84.45 Wins per season
2 of 10 Seasons in playoffs
1 World Series title

Why are you purposely omitting one(maybe two actually) very relevant figures from that comparison?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not sure you can call Kenny Extremely successful.

A little above average
:lol:
You know how you always deny being a White Sox hater? Well, I'll remember you saying Kenny's results were "a little above average" the next time you do.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:49 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Uh, its true IMU. A left handed stud of a starting pitcher is better than anybody the Cubs would have to offer at this point.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Well I'd rather have Chris Sale than any player in the Cubs organization going forward.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqtr_RvR ... age#t=216s

I'm not sure what this means Beardown.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:04 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
That's fine. You take your hitting and get the Texas Rangers going. I'll take pitching and beat that good offense in the playoffs. Good pitching is going to beat good hitting in a 7 game series. You get 2 or 4 Chis Sale types and they are going to beat your "left handed middle of the order every day play" 9 times out of 10. They may get a hit here or there, but won't get a series win.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:09 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79566
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
.
rogers park bryan wrote:
They have a Team president who has been extremely successful
So do the Sox.

Theo Nathan Epstein
839-619 .575 Winning pct
93.22 wins per season
6 of 9 seasons in playoffs
2 World Series Titles


Kenneth Royal Williams
929-854 .521 Winning pct
84.45 Wins per season
2 of 10 Seasons in playoffs
1 World Series title



Not sure you can call Kenny Extremely successful.

A little above average



How come you don't want to take their respective payrolls into consideration now?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
So you think every prospect the Cubs have will work out.

:lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:11 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79566
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
immessedup17 wrote:
Theo has brought on an experienced staff to assist in player moves.



Is that the staff that has accomplished the unprecedented feat of building three last place clubs simultaneously?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not sure you can call Kenny Extremely successful.

A little above average
:lol:
You know how you always deny being a White Sox hater? Well, I'll remember you saying Kenny's results were "a little above average" the next time you do.

Im sorry, how would you describe making the playoffs 20% of the time and an 84% winning pct


Im not a Kenny hater, YOU WAY over rate him.


And I just showed you how much better Theo's track recrod is, but you see them as equals.


I correctly rate him as above average or pretty good.

You have him as a Top GM, when the numbers clearly show, he is not.


You are way too much of a homer when it comes to the Sox. Everything they do is right.
Im not sure I can remember one time you've ever criticized anything they've done.


But lets be clear, Kenny Williams is not considered a TOP GM by any non Sox fan.

Saying he's above average is not an insult. Its accurate.

84 Wins per season, Playoffs once every 5 years (in a terrible divison)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: :lol:

So you expect just about every prospect to hit his potential for one of the worst franchises(in terms of winning) in the history of sports?

Yeah you're definitely a Cub fan.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Theo has brought on an experienced staff to assist in player moves.



Is that the staff that has accomplished the unprecedented feat of building three last place clubs simultaneously?


:lol: :lol:

Ummmm. SHUT UP, that's why.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RPB wrote:
Im sorry, how would you describe making the playoffs 20% of the time and an 84% winning pct

A statistical fuckin' anomaly.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

How come you don't want to take their respective payrolls into consideration now?

I didnt say anything about payrolls.

The results are the results.

You think calling Kenny a little above average is an insult and only White Sox hate like WhiteSoxFanRick thinks?


If 84 wins per season and playoffs 1 of every 5 years is great for a GM, then the White Sox must have terribly low expectations, regardless of payroll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
immessedup17 wrote:
Comprehension is key.
immessedup17 wrote:
I also expect good things going forward from a combination of...

Some of those players won't be in the organization in 3-5 years. A couple might bust. Yet if even half of those become good players, it puts the Cubs in a good position.

You can say this about any teams prospects.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
Comprehension is key.
immessedup17 wrote:
I also expect good things going forward from a combination of...


So you're saying you expect one or more of the prospects to work out.

I'd trademark this before Steve uses it on air.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79566
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
But lets be clear, Kenny Williams is not considered a TOP GM by any non Sox fan.



But his results have been better than many who are considered "better".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
immessedup17 wrote:
This isn't one player vs. one player. Rizzo is only one example. I also expect good things going forward from a combination of Castro, Jackson, Lake, Baez, Vitters, Soler, Szczur, Castillo, etc...

I also think McNutt and Maples will eventually be able to contribute.
I have news for you. Not all of those guys will work out. I bet 2 or 3 might not ever make the Cubs. Maybe they don't make an MLB roster ever, maybe they are traded. To bank on the fact that most of those guys will either do well or contribute at the big league level is asinine.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Image

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79566
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

How come you don't want to take their respective payrolls into consideration now?

I didnt say anything about payrolls.

The results are the results.

You think calling Kenny a little above average is an insult and only White Sox hate like WhiteSoxFanRick thinks?


If 84 wins per season and playoffs 1 of every 5 years is great for a GM, then the White Sox must have terribly low expectations, regardless of payroll.



Just last week you and trickbeck wanted to couch a discussion based on wins per dollar spent. Now suddenly that doesn't count? Let's get a position and stick with it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
The results are the results.
Humber perfect game > Wood 20K game using your own logic.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

How come you don't want to take their respective payrolls into consideration now?

I didnt say anything about payrolls.

The results are the results.

You think calling Kenny a little above average is an insult and only White Sox hate like WhiteSoxFanRick thinks?


If 84 wins per season and playoffs 1 of every 5 years is great for a GM, then the White Sox must have terribly low expectations, regardless of payroll.

RPB, I refuse to believe that you think all teams results should be viewed in an equal light. If that's the case it must really suck for a team like the Royals that they can't even get a Kenny Williams level GM over 2-3 decades.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The results are the results.
Humber perfect game > Wood 20K game using your own logic.

Actually I think using that logic it would be
Humber game = Wood game.

1 win = 1 win

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cubs @ Sox
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

How come you don't want to take their respective payrolls into consideration now?

I didnt say anything about payrolls.

The results are the results.

You think calling Kenny a little above average is an insult and only White Sox hate like WhiteSoxFanRick thinks?


If 84 wins per season and playoffs 1 of every 5 years is great for a GM, then the White Sox must have terribly low expectations, regardless of payroll.



Just last week you and trickbeck wanted to couch a discussion based on wins per dollar spent. Now suddenly that doesn't count? Let's get a position and stick with it.

No, thats not true.

All I said was that Trickybeck was posting facts and not excusing anything Theo does like you said.



I find it funny that Rick seems to think Kenny Williams is one of the top GMs in the game with the very average results he's had.

Does anyone who isnt a Sox fan think Kenny is a great GM?


And if you want to talk about payroll, both the Sox's were usually 2nd in spending in their division for most of the GM's tenure (at least since Det started spending) and Theo still was better.


Im sorry but arguing Kenny has had as much success as Theo is just dumb. He hasnt.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 317 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group