SHARK Attackers

NSJ · **Posted:** Wed May 23, 2012 4:35 pm

SHARK Attack . . . within the swimming area.

http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/blog/336 ... eachgoers/

Quote:

We were fishing off the coast of Bondi Beach and were on board a 32-foot powerboat," he said, via email. "Shortly after catching a small blue shark we tied a rope off to it's tail and the large great white appeared obviously attracted by the frenzy of the blue shark.

"We were amazed as the shark bit the whole blue shark in half and proceeded to play tug of war with us with the remaining tail half. Never seen anything this big so close to Sydney and has been a real shock to the Sydney fishing and surfing community."

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:11 pm

viewtopic.php?f=128&t=70561&p=1450882#p1450882

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

Frank Coztansa wrote:

http://score670.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=70561&p=1450882#p1450882

Are you douchebagging yourself there?

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:14 pm

No. That is just another example of SHARK hearing/reading something and presenting it as his own thoughts. He does this very often with the Sox.

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

Frank Coztansa wrote:

No. That is just another example of SHARK hearing/reading something and presenting it as his own thoughts. He does this very often with the Sox.

Yes, this thread is about people who attack SHARK, and you linked to a thread where you attacked SHARK. Am I missing something here?

SomeGuy · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:21 pm

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:26 pm

You are missing something because nobody "attacks" him. There are posts in here from other people who don't necessarily care of his re-hashed type of posts. All I did was give another example of that.

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

Frank Coztansa wrote:

You are missing something because nobody "attacks" him. There are posts in here from other people who don't necessarily care of his re-hashed type of posts. All I did was give another example of that.

Frank Coztansa wrote:

SHARK wrote:

The fact less than half the Cell was filled the whole weekend tells me one thing. Sox fans aren't sold on this ballclub. They still don't think these Sox are any good.

No it doesn't. You hear that sort of stuff on this show and/or on B&B and you just repost it here. I heard Finji kind of infer this over the weekend, and M&H mentioned this morning as well. We all know you are a P1 guy, SHARK...so you hear these things too.

Chus posted some very valid reasons as to why he can't go. I'm up at 6:15 five days a week, and get home between 5-6pm. Thats a long fucking day. Its expensive, but I like going to games. Its too long of a day for me to go on a weekday. I am looking to go to one of these Toronto games because of the $5 seats, but really the money isn't the big thing. Its the time. I don't mind dropping $75 between a ticket, parking, and some food/beer a few times a season. I simply don't have time to go during the week.

I'm sold on this club, SHARK. In fact, most of the Sox fans I talk to are growing more and more confident in this team with each passing series. They have showed me they have more piss and vinegar than the have in a long, long time under Ozzie. But the lack of attendance doesn't "tell" you that people don't believe in this team. Its a talking point for the sports yakers, and you take it in the same direction they do. ALL THE TIME.

Why can't you just simply say, "I heard Mac (or whoever) talking about the lack of attendance and he seems to think that maybe fans aren't sold on this team yet. The more I think about it, the more I agree with him." Why do you always have to present these types of thoughts as you own?

SHARK · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:34 pm

SomeGuy wrote:

That also looks like a Led Zeppelin album cover...

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

OKC gettin a bit feisty this morning....

The Original Kid Cairo · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:43 am

Douchebag wrote:

OKC gettin a bit feisty this morning....

Nah man. He had people defending his odd points last week and this week. Now I caught him in a direct contradiction and I'm kinda feeling myself a little bit....so to speak.

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:44 am

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

I'm kinda feeling myself a little bit...

I feel ya....

Phil McCracken · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:07 am

Dewskie wrote:

I can't really say I've been here long enough to say I have a beef with anyone (cue up Murph soundboard), but I'm pretty sure every forum's got something of a SHARK, re: a guy who tries to be a daily contributor by starting threads that are informative and set the parameters for the discussion to come.

Unfortunately that variety of poster doesn't seem to work around here. This is no ordinary forum that let's posters come in and get a pass like that. If SHARK said some shit that could be deemed as bogus or factually retarded, he's gotta prove to you carnivorous bastards that he won't take bullshit lying down.

Or he can be like me and just get in shouting matches with Boilermaker Rick as I grasp straws to defend the fact that I'm violently wrong. It's sort of like Andy DuFresne fighting off the sisters in the laundry room, or Spider telling Tommy to go fuck himself.

I think Dewskie should be banned for life.

BD · **Joined:** Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm **Posts:** 12450

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

SHARK is just a quirky guy who posts facts instead of uneducated opinions like the rest of us.

His "facts" aren't usually fact though. They're opinions cloaked in the guise of being fact. Like saying that ABC would be upset with a Heat/OKC or Heat/Spurs matchup. He didn't say "I don't think ABC would like it." He tried to definitively state it as fact. He does that more often than people like to admit. Others do it and get called out for it. Why is he exempt from being called out?

Nobody is attacking SHARK as a person, but if you're gonna jump into the sports conversations, you should be subjected to having your thoughts picked apart just like everybody else.

So, he's a member of the Lame Stream Media then?

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

Frank Coztansa wrote:

SHARK wrote:

Frank Coztansa wrote:

Of course you weren't. You try to be just as negative as Bernstein.

SHARK's being realistic. It was fun while it lasted...

The fuck? The White Sox are in first place as it stands right now. As recent as Friday night, they had a chance to have the best record in the AL. Yes, the starting pitching needs to be better. 3rd base is not as much as a problem right now because the Sox are scoring a lot of runs.

Saying "it was fun while it lasted" about a first place club in June is not being realistic, its being flat out moronic.

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Not gonna back off that comment whatsoever. I don't care who said it. Implying that the Sox--or any MLB team in their position-- are done while they sit in 1st place on June 11th is just plain wrong and stupid. The goddam Cardinals were 10 games out last year on Labor Day and still made the playoffs.

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

I'm going to have to issue another warning. Lay off my guy.

The Original Kid Cairo · **Posted:** Fri Jun 15, 2012 1:35 pm

He's not being attacked. However, people have decided to stop handling him with kid gloves. If he wants to get in on the discussions, fine. But like I said, what you present to the conversation is often what you get out of it.

Brick · **Posted:** Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:34 am

http://score670.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=1464492#p1464492

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

Now you people are going with the "We are not allowed to comment route".

Top Suspects:
1. Terry's Peeps
2. Frank Cozstanza

I've got my eye on you two.

SHARK · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:54 pm

Douchebag wrote:

Now you people are going with the "We are not allowed to comment route".

Top Suspects:
1. Terry's Peeps
2. Frank Cozstanza

I've got my eye on you two.

It's OK if those guys want to comment on anything I post or discuss here. There's nothing wrong with constructive criticism. I'm cool with that.

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

C'mon SHARK, I want to see you get angry. There's chum in the water, and it's time to strike. Make Frank your bitch.

jimmypasta · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:56 pm

SHARK wrote:

Douchebag wrote:

Now you people are going with the "We are not allowed to comment route".

Top Suspects:
1. Terry's Peeps
2. Frank Cozstanza

I've got my eye on you two.

It's OK if those guys want to comment on anything I post or discuss here. There's nothing wrong with constructive criticism. I'm cool with that.

What are you smoking,Shark? "constructive criticism"? That's rich :lol:

SHARK · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:57 pm

Douchebag wrote:

C'mon SHARK, I want to see you get angry. There's chum in the water, and it's time to strike. Make Frank your bitch.

I don't understand what the fuss is about...

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:20 pm

Me either.

Terry's Peeps · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:36 pm

What a Douchebag...

Douchebag · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm **Posts:** 43572

FavreFan is on notice

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 30328

SHARK Attackers

Who is online