It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 1:47 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Different context. He said Sale had a makeup and skill set similar to Randy Johnson. He never said Sale's ceiling was at a Randy Johnson level. He also said that in retort to IMU comparing Chris Sale to Erik Bedard.


Sale is certainly superior to Randy Johnson at the same age and same stage of their careers. Johnson walked the whole fucking world until he was nearly 30. But if anyone were to suggest that Sale will have the career Johnson did, I would think they were insane. Maybe he will, but it isn't something to count on. It just doesn't happen enough.

The modern fan gets so excited when a guy has a good three months. If I were to tell today's fan that you could lock Trout's career in right now as Harold Baines or Andre Dawson, most would think that was stupid, as if Trout is guaranteed to be better than that. Realistically, he probably won't be. Just like the guys who think Durant will average more than 22 ppg for his career. He better start throwing up some 30 ppg seasons right now.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
I know it is tough, as a Sox fans, watching prospect after prospect succeed for the Cubs. I wish I knew how to console you Frank.
:lol: :lol: The White Sox system has churned out major leaguer after major leaguer. Productive and sometimes All Star players at that. Just because not all of them play for the Sox, doesn't mean that their system has not been fruitful. They have had their own guys become impact players for them, and they have also picked up guys passed on by other teams;

Chris Sale
Gordon Beckham
Addison Reed
Gio Gonzalez
Nate Jones
Jose Quintana
John Danks
Jordan Danks
Clayton Richard
Tyler Flowers
Brent Lillibridge
Chris Getz
Alexei Ramirez
Nick Masset
Boone Logan
Joe Crede
Lucas Harrell
Daniel Hudson
Sergio Santos
Brent Morel

Its one of the biggest misconceptions out there, that the White Sox system is so bad. Yet ALL of the players above have been viable Major League players at some point since 2008. All were in the Sox system. Keep swinging and missing, IMU. At least you are consistently looking foolish in this thread!

You could make a similar list for most teams in baseball, Frank.

And half the guys on that list are bums.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
You could make a similar list for most teams in baseball, Frank.


Give us the Cubs list, Bryan.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Different context. He said Sale had a makeup and skill set similar to Randy Johnson. He never said Sale's ceiling was at a Randy Johnson level. He also said that in retort to IMU comparing Chris Sale to Erik Bedard.


Sale is certainly superior to Randy Johnson at the same age and same stage of their careers. Johnson walked the whole fucking world until he was nearly 30. But if anyone were to suggest that Sale will have the career Johnson did, I would think they were insane. Maybe he will, but it isn't something to count on. It just doesn't happen enough.

The modern fan gets so excited when a guy has a good three months. If I were to tell today's fan that you could lock Trout's career in right now as Harold Baines or Andre Dawson, most would think that was stupid, as if Trout is guaranteed to be better than that. Realistically, he probably won't be. Just like the guys who think Durant will average more than 22 ppg for his career. He better start throwing up some 30 ppg seasons right now.

The Trout-Baines-Dawson thing is valid because of those guys longevity

The Durant thing is a little weird. He'll likely end up around 24 or 25.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Durant thing is a little weird. He'll likely end up around 24 or 25.


How could you possibly figure that? He's averaging 26 and change right now. He will certainly have years at the end where he averages 12 or something like that. Unless he has a career-ending injury in his prime. He's certainly not on pace to average 24 or 25. That would be like saying Trout is on pace to average .375.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You could make a similar list for most teams in baseball, Frank.


Give us the Cubs list, Bryan.

No problem...

Dontrelle Willis
Josh Hamilton
Randy Wells
Geovany Soto
Darwin Barney
Brett Jackson
Zambrano
K Wood
Mark Prior
Carlos Marmol
Jeff Smardzija
James Russell
Ryan Theriot
Mike Fontonot
Corey Patterson
Eric Patterson


Over half of them are all stars and I could easily keep going since the perameters seems to be "contributed to a major league team"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Durant thing is a little weird. He'll likely end up around 24 or 25.


How could you possibly figure that? He's averaging 26 and change right now. He will certainly have years at the end where he averages 12 or something like that.

What do you mean certainly? He almost certainly will NOT ever average anything close to 12. He's a great scorer and getting better. His career avg is 26.8 right now. It will go up a bit and then come back to 24

EDIT/ADD: Dominique averaged 24.8 ppg. He had a 27 game season at the end where he averaged 5.0 I think Durant is better than him.

What superstar scorer ever averages 12?


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.

Well, if they are claiming Quintana


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.
Not really. Prior was up in 2003 and Wood in 1998. My initial list for the Sox guys was from 2008 thru the present.

But I can go back and edit my list to include Magglio Ordonez, Frank Thomas, Jack McDowell, Mark Buerhle, Keith Foulke...among others :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.
Not really. Prior was up in 2003 and Wood in 1998. My initial list for the Sox guys was from 2008 thru the present.

But I can go back and edit my list to include Magglio Ordonez, Frank Thomas, Jack McDowell, Mark Buerhle, Keith Foulke...among others :lol:

What do you mean 2008?

Lots of those guys were drafted before then


Are you talking in the majors since 08? That's awfully specific but ill make another list once you define the parameters you are using to make the White Sox system look good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57199
rogers park bryan wrote:
but ill make another list once you define the parameters you are using to make the White Sox system look good.


:lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Also, I didnt realize that Joe Crede came up in 08

He's already got 140 homeruns!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:14 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Outside of Crede, nobody on that list made their MLB debut prior to 2007. You went back to 1998 to attempt to make your list look better.

I'm not saying the Sox have this some all time great system or that its even one of the best in MLB. But its certainly nowhere near the worst, as many people believe. The amount of MLB players the Sox system has produced recently shows that to be true.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
rogers park bryan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.

Well, if they are claiming Quintana

The White Sox did teach Quintana how to throw a cutter which helped turn him into the pitcher he is now. I don't think the Cubs taught Hamilton anything in the 5 minutes he was in the organization.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
They probably taught him how to drink.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Outside of Crede, nobody on that list made their MLB debut prior to 2007. You went back to 1998 to attempt to make your list look better.

I'm not saying the Sox have this some all time great system or that its even one of the best in MLB. But its certainly nowhere near the worst, as many people believe. The amount of MLB players the Sox system has produced recently shows that to be true.

That's fine but you are using some pretty marginal players to make your point

My counterpoint is that every team has marginal guys make it and bounce around.

Its who develops the most GOOD players

Not who develops Brent Morel or Eric Patterson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Durant thing is a little weird. He'll likely end up around 24 or 25.


How could you possibly figure that? He's averaging 26 and change right now. He will certainly have years at the end where he averages 12 or something like that.

What do you mean certainly? He almost certainly will NOT ever average anything close to 12. He's a great scorer and getting better. His career avg is 26.8 right now. It will go up a bit and then come back to 24

EDIT/ADD: Dominique averaged 24.8 ppg. He had a 27 game season at the end where he averaged 5.0 I think Durant is better than him.

What superstar scorer ever averages 12?


Many average far below what they did in their 20s at the end. Aguirre, McAdoo. What did Malone get as a Laker? Even the great Jordan was under 20 in his last year.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.

Well, if they are claiming Quintana

The White Sox did teach Quintana how to throw a cutter which helped turn him into the pitcher he is now. I don't think the Cubs taught Hamilton anything in the 5 minutes he was in the organization.

Ok.

Quintana didnt come from the White Sox system.

Do you give the Cubs credit for teaching Sosa to hit homeruns?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Durant thing is a little weird. He'll likely end up around 24 or 25.


How could you possibly figure that? He's averaging 26 and change right now. He will certainly have years at the end where he averages 12 or something like that.

What do you mean certainly? He almost certainly will NOT ever average anything close to 12. He's a great scorer and getting better. His career avg is 26.8 right now. It will go up a bit and then come back to 24

EDIT/ADD: Dominique averaged 24.8 ppg. He had a 27 game season at the end where he averaged 5.0 I think Durant is better than him.

What superstar scorer ever averages 12?


Many average far below what they did in their 20s at the end. Aguirre, McAdoo. What did Malone get as a Laker? Even the great Jordan was under 20 in his last year.

Malone is a rare case. Most stars wont be 4th options at the end of their career.

I think Durant is better than everyone mentioned in this post other than 23


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79453
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.

Well, if they are claiming Quintana


Did the Cubs bring Hamilton to the big leagues? They didnt even know what they had. At least the Sox knew Gio was decent.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Morel is still young enough to have a solid career.

Anyway, the Cubs have developed some players too. IMU, stupidly, inferred that the Cubs were churning out all star after all star, and that Jackson is on that same path. He's had a good 10-12 games or so. Good for him. 2 weeks ago he was striking out more than Adam Dunn.....who IMU apparently thinks is awful and would rather Soriano over 40+ HRs and likely 100+ RBI's

I don't even think 312whistler would take Soriano over Dunn and/or Jackson over Trout. I guess the overall point of this whole thing is that IMU is kinda pretty stupid. :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
No. All that credit goes to Flintstone vitamins.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Hamilton is a stretch name you threw in there for shock value, but the point is well made.

Well, if they are claiming Quintana


Did the Cubs bring Hamilton to the big leagues? They didnt even know what they had. At least the Sox knew Gio was decent.

Doesnt mattter. Quintana is not a product of the White Sox system and Hamilton is not a product of the Cub system.

Its just that simple.

And if they knew Gio was decent, they shouldnt have traded him 6 times


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
No. All that credit goes to Flintstone vitamins.

Right.

Sosa was probably taking whatever A.J. is taking this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Morel is still young enough to have a solid career.

Anyway, the Cubs have developed some players too. IMU, stupidly, inferred that the Cubs were churning out all star after all star, and that Jackson is on that same path. He's had a good 10-12 games or so. Good for him. 2 weeks ago he was striking out more than Adam Dunn.....who IMU apparently thinks is awful and would rather Soriano over 40+ HRs and likely 100+ RBI's

I don't even think 312whistler would take Soriano over Dunn and/or Jackson over Trout. I guess the overall point of this whole thing is that IMU is kinda pretty stupid. :lol:

Yeah, see you responded to trolling.

Of course the Cubs are not churning out player after player....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23751
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Frank Coztansa wrote:
IMU, stupidly, inferred that the Cubs were churning out all star after all star, and that Jackson is on that same path.


Castro and Lahair, that's an all-star after all-star. Sounds right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
KDdidit wrote:
Castro and Lahair, that's an all-star after all-star. Sounds right.

Image
Oh, Dear....

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91921
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU,
Answer this question with a Yes or a No.

Do you think that Jackson will be as good as Mike Trout?

I don't even know if Mike Trout will be as good as Mike Trout. He has had a hell of a 2012 season...it could be somewhat of an aberration. He may never approach those season numbers again.
I'm asking which player you think will have a better career. Please answer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
Jackson's been on fire . . .

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group