Tiger played a lot better than his numbers. He sucked friday morning and got off to a slow start in the afternoon and then birdied something like 4-5 holes on the back nine to get his team back into it only to have Stricker suck and give him no help in the comeback. Then Saturday afternoon he played well, especially on the back where he birdied 4-5 holes again, but his partner was a bum and he was unlucky to run into the hottest putting display in Ryder history from the big Belgium.

Then Sunday, he was 1 up sitting in the middle of the fairway on 18 when it ended.

As far as the team goats, he's not even in the top 3 which is reserved for Stricker, Furyk and Snedeker. Those 3 played far worse than Tiger and easily cost the US the Cup.

Also, take away one session (saturday morning) from Bubba and he was pretty brutal the rest of the weekend. Simpson got no help from him in their win Saturday afternoon and then he got schooled by Donald sunday.

While I agree that Tiger's play improved on Sunday, he was still pretty lousy the rest of the tournament. Both Furyk and Snedeker won points for the U.S. whereas Stricker and Woods did not. I guess I don't follow your logic here.

While I agree that Tiger's play improved on Sunday, he was still pretty lousy the rest of the tournament. Both Furyk and Snedeker won points for the U.S. whereas Stricker and Woods did not. I guess I don't follow your logic here.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

As poor as Snedeker was, he still scored more points than Stricker and Woods combined. They were up against hot competition on Saturday afternoon...they still both sucked on Friday.

I find the scoring to be somewhat confusing. Instead of matching them off against each why not just give the win to the team with the lowest overall number of strokes?

I find the scoring to be somewhat confusing. Instead of matching them off against each why not just give the win to the team with the lowest overall number of strokes?

I find the scoring to be somewhat confusing. Instead of matching them off against each why not just give the win to the team with the lowest overall number of strokes?

This.

Whether Snedeker played well or awful during the first two days won't show up in the overall score, which is the luxury of team play. Woods played much better Saturday afternoon and Sunday, but that won't show up either since his team still lost.

The only reason I put Tiger ahead of Stricker this weekend is because he managed a half-point on Sunday.

Got signatures from Keegan Bradley, Phil Mickelson, and Rory McIlroy

Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Part of me quoted it because I thought a couple of the golf fans on the board would find that kinda cool. The other part of me quoted because I knew you would say something about it. I'd have quoted it even if I got nothing just because of that. I'm certainly more entertaining than you, but that's not saying much.

Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

There is a mindset among some fans that when a team loses, someone on their preferred team must be blamed. Conversely, when their team wins, they get the credit. It is almost as if for these fans, the opponents' play doesn't matter. The Euros won because they played well and made more putts on Sunday. It wasn't a "collapse"...The Americans played ok to good. Several Euros played better. Whenever a team wins 8.5 -3.5 (Sunday's score) the winning team must have done a lot to win. I think credit goes to them much more than discrediting the Americans.

I could agree with that more if we hadn't epicly failed on 17 and 18 so badly. When it got the toughest, we folded.

I could agree with that more if we hadn't epicly failed on 17 and 18 so badly. When it got the toughest, we folded.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

There is a mindset among some fans that when a team loses, someone on their preferred team must be blamed. Conversely, when their team wins, they get the credit. It is almost as if for these fans, the opponents' play doesn't matter. The Euros won because they played well and made more putts on Sunday. It wasn't a "collapse"...The Americans played ok to good. Several Euros played better. Whenever a team wins 8.5 -3.5 (Sunday's score) the winning team must have done a lot to win. I think credit goes to them much more than discrediting the Americans.

Im pretty hammered right now.

When something/someone/anything is successful, somebody gets credit.
When something/someone/anything fails, somebody gets blame.

Because then you wouldn't be using match format and the entire event loses meaning.

I'm just suggesting that they shouldn't play with matches.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

I'm just suggesting that they shouldn't play with matches.

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.

Has anyone defined collapse yet?

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

WWE stock
Arkansas football
The New Orleans Saints

Has anyone defined collapse yet?

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.