It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:02 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:50 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I never said "perfect". It was a little slower then I liked. But I defidently liked the last scene.

Yes Midget I guessed it about half way through. But I wasn't convinced I was correct. That's why the suspense was still there for me.

I knew before the show there was no way they could tie all of the shit they threw at us in an hour episode.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:57 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Beardown wrote:
I never said "perfect". It was a little slower then I liked. But I defidently liked the last scene.

Yes Midget I guessed it about half way through. But I wasn't convinced I was correct. That's why the suspense was still there for me.

I knew before the show there was no way they could tie all of the shit they threw at us in an hour episode.


Even if one accepts the idea that the ending was suspenseful (which is difficult to do given your contradictory statements about it), why is that inherently good?

And the "perfect" comment was obviously Mustang Rob's. I thought I made that clear when I quoted him in my response.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:58 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Thinking more about it. I think there was a symbol of that bell ringing when Meadow walked in and showing Tony's meatball face looking at the door.

He's wondering when that bell will toll for him.

In fact, I don't think that bell rang every time other people walked in. I could be wrong.

I also think Chase's overall message was that women can't drive. That's why we saw meadow struggle to park for such a long time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:01 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
It's not a contradiction. I said I didn't know. It was just a guess running through my mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:06 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Beardown wrote:
It's not a contradiction. I said I didn't know. It was just a guess running through my mind.


For God's sake, read your own writing. Obviously you couldn't say for sure that you "knew" how the episode would end, but you did claim to "figure it out half way through". If you figured it out, there's no suspense.

But even if you didn't, why is a suspenseful ending inherently desirable and preferable to any number of other ways the show might've ended?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37833
Location: ...
TM, you said it. I agree 100%.

Greenie this morning was trying to make a comparison to a short story read to him 30 years ago called "The Lady, or the Tiger?". The purpose of the story was to show ambiguity in humanity, and conundrums. Its ending was not an ending, it was a question; the same thing happened in a wonderful John Sayles movie called "Limbo". In both cases, the entire idea of the story and the narrative arc has to do with not resolving things, but dealing with the open ended questions about life.

So if you're going to say that "The Sopranos" wanted to go for that as well, then it betrayed everything about the show. The mob is about closure. Nothing's ever left on the table. People are "taken care of". To now go back and say, "No we're not going to show you what happens to Tony" is a complete 180 of what the show's direction was--and not only is it not artistic, it's unsatisfactory and it's just another example of David Chase and Terrence Winter's arrogance.

If the show wasn't about closure, then why spend so much time on characters' deaths? To me, it seemed, most of the deaths were cop outs creatively because the writers didn't know where to go with their stories anymore.

That last five minutes of the finale, which admittedly were well shot and gives you a feeling of urgency and anxiety--fell flat in the end.

Bah. Humbug.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:10 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I guess I didn't need the bullet through Tony's head to declare it a genious episode like so many did.

I know what I said Midget. I tried to explain why their was still suspense for me. I have no motive to lie about that on a message board. I wasn't convinced that I was correct. I don't know what more to say.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:14 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Not half way like I initially said. I knew nothing was gonna happen when that guy walked into the bathroom. I knew that was Chase fucking with us and making us think "God Father".

So there. It was towords the end when I figured it out. Sorry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
In my opinion, hearing the gunshot would have been all that was needed. At this point, we are left to argue whether or not this scene was even an attempt on Tony's life.

For years, people had followed the story of Tony Soprano. The payoff was to not know even if this was an attempt on his life. If taken that he wasn't killed, then that scene was the most suspenseful and dramatic buildup for absolutely nothing I have ever seen. If taken that he was killed, it was a letdown due to the fact that there is no definitive evidence that it was even an attempt on his life.

This is not a Picasso. This is not a symphony. This was a tv show. I could make up my own story and make it whatever I want. I watch shows to be surprised by the creativity of professional script writers and directors and actors.


LOST better end much better than this, but I fear it won't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:21 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
But you still haven't answered why the "suspenseful" ending is an inherently good one. It seems like the only way you can justify it is by contrasting it to an alternate ending where Tony "gets a bullet in his head". Sorry, but those aren't the only two options for ending the show. It could've gone in any number of directions if it hadn't lost its narrative perspective a couple seasons ago. It was a bad ending to what had become an intellectually and imaginatively bankrupt show. The fact that we don't know what happens to the characters doesn't improve the finale's imaginative richness. Rather, it simply widens the black hole that became The Sopranos' narrative arc.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:22 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Right. You watch to be surprised. I'll bet most of America was surprised by that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:27 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Panther pislA wrote:
The show is ONLY what the writers, directors, and actors make it to be.

You idiots that try to make it YOURS by feeling this way and that about the ending are megalomaniacs.

You wandered upon a "telling" tale, and it ended the way it ended (or. . . did not end), and that's IT.

All this philosophizing (is that even a word?) about the wasted suspense, etc. just makes you sound like A.J. SOPRANO.


This is some of the dumbest shit I've ever read on this board. Any fictional text is open to interpretation. Further, in its more imaginative early stages, The Sopranos actually openly encouraged multiple interpretations through experimenting with dream sequences and purposely abstract, inscrutable scenes. For you to suggest that there is ONLY one way to feel about a show is reductive, inconsistent with the show's own aesthetic, and out of touch with the manner in which imaginative works operate.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:28 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Sure Midget. It could have gone in several directions. Another one might have been accepted by you and not others.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:30 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Beardown wrote:
Right. You watch to be surprised. I'll bet most of America was surprised by that.


Yeah, well, if Tony had jumpeed up on the table and started doing a strip tease while singing "I've Got to Be Me", the audience would've been surprised, too. But that wouldn't have made the ending good. The lack of an ending may have been surprising, but it was also a retreat from all of the larger ideas the show had set in motion from its inception. In abruptly breaking from its narrative and thematic trajectory, the ending was clearly a failure.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:32 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Beardown wrote:
Sure Midget. It could have gone in several directions. Another one might have been accepted by you and not others.


My quibble isn't with a lack of closure so much as it is with the show's refusal to engage with its own main ideas in any sustained way. The whole final couple of seasons had a random quality that grossly undercut its early greatness. Are you under the impression that the final couple of seasons were good?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:45 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:29 pm
Posts: 1927
Location: State of Love and Trust
The whole ending was a cop-out. David Chase refused to give us any idea of what lies in store for Tony - does he die, is he arrested, does he flip, does life just continue on? Instead, he continued his trend of mailing it in, and ruined the whole show previous to this episode for me. I will never be able to remember the good episodes that the Sopranos had without being reminded of this crap.

_________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. ~ Benjamin Franklin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:55 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I don't think a shows worth is dependent on its conclusion. It's about the journey for shows like this. Most of you liked this show. They had several conflicts throughout with satisfactory conclusion to many of you.

If you think the "fade to black" meant nothing then the conclusion of the show was Tony won - for now. We just won't be able to see his life any more. I'm fine with that. There were several other messages involved that many have interpretted. But at the core it's that Tony wins.

It's fine if you don't like that. I'm fine with it and thought the show was great for the most part. It was a fun ride that had you thinking.

I think people put too much on the conclusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:06 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Beardown wrote:
I don't think a shows worth is dependent on its conclusion. It's about the journey for shows like this. Most of you liked this show. They had several conflicts throughout with satisfactory conclusion to many of you.

If you think the "fade to black" meant nothing then the conclusion of the show was Tony won - for now. We just won't be able to see his life any more. I'm fine with that. There were several other messages involved that many have interpretted. But at the core it's that Tony wins.

It's fine if you don't like that. I'm fine with it and thought the show was great for the most part. It was a fun ride that had you thinking.

I think people put too much on the conclusion.


Like I've already said, I don't have a problem with a lack of closure in principle. It's the poorly executed finale--its retreat from its major ideas and meaningful plot--that I found troubling. You seem to be setting yourself up as a champion of narrative ambiguity who opposes a group of closure-obsessed simpletons. But that's not really what the debate is about. You are championing something that is by almost any aesthetic standard a failure.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Even though it is before my time, would it have made Dallas better to never find out who shot JR and instead leave it up to your imagination?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
What major ideas? Tony and his crew were dumb mafia guys. Tony is a sociopath who contradicts himself throughout.

The show never had this great set up to a conclusion like you say. That was part of its charm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37833
Location: ...
like the finale, i don't think this will ever be resolved.

we've all made our points, and i don't think anybody's changing their mind. i've reflected more on the episode, and though i can see more clearly what chase was doing, it doesn't make up for the inconsistencies of the show or the masturbation that was the finale. i stand by my position on the finale--i'm just not using the expletives anymore to describe it...at least not now :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Quote:
What major ideas? Tony and his crew were dumb mafia guys. Tony is a sociopath who contradicts himself throughout.

The show never had this great set up to a conclusion like you say. That was part of its charm.



What significant imaginative texts don't contradict themselves or at least characters who contradict themselves? It would be hard, if not impossible, for me to name any. Can you? Contradiction, ambiguity, ambivalence and paradox are important aspects of most novels, movies, and ambitious TV shows. If you disagree, show me otherwise.

The show abandoned all kinds of ideas in its final season--questions of Tony's psychological development, his status as a sensitive killer, adulterous family man and patriotic criminal all seemed like they would be important conflicts in determining his fate, but didn't amount to much, if anything. The show just ends without doing more than point out these conflicts, leaving the viewer to wonder what the point of all the sound and fury was.

Additionally, the major conflict between the idea of the mafia as a family and mafia as a business was never fully developed, even when Tony kills Chris, the nephew whom he loves as a son. What, according to the show's own logic, should have been a devastating, life-changing moment for Tony was treated as something casual, like Tony roughing up an upstart street tough trying to cut in on one of his illicit businesses. The show established the Tony-Chris relationship as a crucial one, but ended it without a second thought. This was a betrayal of the audience and a betrayal of its own ideas, as was the series finale and the last couple of seasons as a whole.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:09 pm
Posts: 3944
http://score670.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=12361


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:38 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Panther pislA wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
The show is ONLY what the writers, directors, and actors make it to be.

You idiots that try to make it YOURS by feeling this way and that about the ending are megalomaniacs.

You wandered upon a "telling" tale, and it ended the way it ended (or. . . did not end), and that's IT.

All this philosophizing (is that even a word?) about the wasted suspense, etc. just makes you sound like A.J. SOPRANO.


This is some of the dumbest shit I've ever read on this board. Any fictional text is open to interpretation. Further, in its more imaginative early stages, The Sopranos actually openly encouraged multiple interpretations through experimenting with dream sequences and purposely abstract, inscrutable scenes. For you to suggest that there is ONLY one way to feel about a show is reductive, inconsistent with the show's own aesthetic, and out of touch with the manner in which imaginative works operate.



Midget, I am sure I have seen it somewhere in here before, but you are obviously either Bernstein or you are one of his overly-faithful flock ("ass-lickers", you [or your hero] would say). . .

. . . an artsy-fartsy control freak just like him (or how he purports to be while he is on the air). I bet you have been admonished for "backseat driving" many times before.

You are obviously NOT the target audience for this show - you are more the target audience for Frazier or whatever show Dr. Melfi watches.

Your decimation of the finale is akin to one wondering why DaVinci did not make the Mona Lisa's smile even, and then clamoring for a fix to be painted-in or saying that it is worthless art. It is useless to bash a true masterpiece of one artist's vision in that manner.

What is deplorable, though, is the way you try to commandeer the board with your proclamative tone. Your overuse of the persuasive words "Clearly", etc. implies what? - that you are the God of TV?

When you eventually do get up from the toilet, you will find that you forgot to check for the plunger before you sat down.

P.S.: And if you want an "Intellectual Throw Down" we can do that, too. I will be here all day with your self-absorbed, condescending ass.

P.S.S.: You can go ahead and edit my grammar and spelling if you get bored.


It's funny that you label me the control freak when you're the one telling others not to question or criticize a TV show. I guess we all need to sit down and listen for our answers from the great David Chase, eh? I can't believe I have to explain this to someone, but people have been discussing, debating, and criticizing artwork since artwork itself has existed. Criticism is, after all, part of the process that helps define a "masterpiece" as such. Your ignorance in this regard is almost as unfortunate as David Chase's creative fecklessness.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:38 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
It is clear that Tony considered Mafia a business only. Not a family. He never cried or showed any emotion after any of his guys died. He killed his cousin Tony. He killed Christopher. He never cried for silvio or his brother in law. He moved on as if nothing happened.

He wanted sympathy for his mother and lack of love yet he didn't have sympathy for his son and his problems. He called him weak. Chris was weak because he couldn't cure his demons.

Tony was selfish and only cared about himself and his problems. His only goal was survival.


Last edited by Beardown on Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Panther Pisa and Tall Midget,
Do you not realize this is the internet? You aren't supposed to argue with big words and thought out sentences. Arguing on the internet is all about gay jokes, telling the other person to get out of their moms basement, and bragging about your hot girlfriend.

There is no room on the internet for your kind of dialogue.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:54 pm
Posts: 5432
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Tall Midget is my hero


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
You're my hero.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group