It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 5:54 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
From the cbs story about the Jackson signing

With the addition of Jackson, the Cubs now feasibly have seven big-league level starting pitchers in Jackson, Matt Garza, Jeff Samardzija, Scott Feldman, Scott Baker, Travis Wood and Carlos Villanueva. Baker is recovering from Tommy John surgery, Garza is recovering from second-half arm issues and Villanueva could pitch out of the bullpen, so there's some need for depth.

So you figure Smardz, Jackson and Garza are locks for the rotation if healthy.....Is it bad that I am worried that we won't be able to find two starters that arent awful out of the Feldman, Baker, Villanueva, Wood pu pu platter?

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Phil McCracken wrote:
From the cbs story about the Jackson signing

With the addition of Jackson, the Cubs now feasibly have seven big-league level starting pitchers in Jackson, Matt Garza, Jeff Samardzija, Scott Feldman, Scott Baker, Travis Wood and Carlos Villanueva. Baker is recovering from Tommy John surgery, Garza is recovering from second-half arm issues and Villanueva could pitch out of the bullpen, so there's some need for depth.

So you figure Smardz, Jackson and Garza are locks for the rotation if healthy.....Is it bad that I am worried that we won't be able to find two starters that arent awful out of the Feldman, Baker, Villanueva, Wood pu pu platter?


Who cares? They will suck next year anyways.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
By mid-season,Chris Rusin will be starting.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
From the cbs story about the Jackson signing

With the addition of Jackson, the Cubs now feasibly have seven big-league level starting pitchers in Jackson, Matt Garza, Jeff Samardzija, Scott Feldman, Scott Baker, Travis Wood and Carlos Villanueva. Baker is recovering from Tommy John surgery, Garza is recovering from second-half arm issues and Villanueva could pitch out of the bullpen, so there's some need for depth.

So you figure Smardz, Jackson and Garza are locks for the rotation if healthy.....Is it bad that I am worried that we won't be able to find two starters that arent awful out of the Feldman, Baker, Villanueva, Wood pu pu platter?


Who cares? They will suck next year anyways.

I understand. But I think we can both agree that it would be nice if they sucked a little bit less than last year. That was a hard season to get through. Would you be pissed if the Cubs somehow went on a run for a post season berth because it messed up the suckage plan?

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
jimmypasta wrote:
By mid-season,Chris Rusin will be starting.


We will see if he's even on the team. Cubs have to DFA some people to make room for the new signings, I believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Big Chicagoan wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
By mid-season,Chris Rusin will be starting.


We will see if he's even on the team. Cubs have to DFA some people to make room for the new signings, I believe.

*fingers crossed* Cmon Ian Stewart.....

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Phil McCracken wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
From the cbs story about the Jackson signing

With the addition of Jackson, the Cubs now feasibly have seven big-league level starting pitchers in Jackson, Matt Garza, Jeff Samardzija, Scott Feldman, Scott Baker, Travis Wood and Carlos Villanueva. Baker is recovering from Tommy John surgery, Garza is recovering from second-half arm issues and Villanueva could pitch out of the bullpen, so there's some need for depth.

So you figure Smardz, Jackson and Garza are locks for the rotation if healthy.....Is it bad that I am worried that we won't be able to find two starters that arent awful out of the Feldman, Baker, Villanueva, Wood pu pu platter?


Who cares? They will suck next year anyways.

I understand. But I think we can both agree that it would be nice if they sucked a little bit less than last year. That was a hard season to get through. Would you be pissed if the Cubs somehow went on a run for a post season berth because it messed up the suckage plan?


I would like them to suck less, but If Feldman, Baker, or Villanueva pitch well this season, they will all be gone at the deadline. In other words, Cubs could be better until July 31, at which time they will tank the season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I think there's nothing wrong with inviting Stewart to camp. Let's see if he can hit the ball,we know he is a decent fielder. I keep thinking of Derrick Lee and his wrist injury. It takes awhile.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
jimmypasta wrote:
I think there's nothing wrong with inviting Stewart to camp. Let's see if he can hit the ball,we know he is a decent fielder. I keep thinking of Derrick Lee and his wrist injury. It takes awhile.

They signed Stewart to like a 2 million dollar deal I am sure he will be in camp. He blows.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Phil McCracken wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I think there's nothing wrong with inviting Stewart to camp. Let's see if he can hit the ball,we know he is a decent fielder. I keep thinking of Derrick Lee and his wrist injury. It takes awhile.

They signed Stewart to like a 2 million dollar deal I am sure he will be in camp. He blows.


ONLY if he breaks with the team and makes the roster.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
jimmypasta wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I think there's nothing wrong with inviting Stewart to camp. Let's see if he can hit the ball,we know he is a decent fielder. I keep thinking of Derrick Lee and his wrist injury. It takes awhile.

They signed Stewart to like a 2 million dollar deal I am sure he will be in camp. He blows.


ONLY if he breaks with the team and makes the roster.

So you are telling me there's hope that he will break his wrist again and I will never have to see that pile of garbage in a Cubs uni? It is going to be a Merry Christmas after all james.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
yeah and he's fat,too!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Phil McCracken wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
They gave away Paul Maholm for I don't remember what. That move is costing them about 40-50 million this year.


They got one of the Braves top pitching prospects.


Ok,I forgot but it is true. Maholm was signed for 2013. Maybe they don't chase Edwin Jackson if they have him to pick up 150 IP.

So the Cubs shouldn't trade their pitchers for prospects? I am so confused by what my fellow Cubs fans want. We are all over the place this offseason from a fan reaction standpoint.


Hoping for a team to lose in order for it to eventually win creates a psychosis

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Here's what I don't understand about this deal. Jackson was a free agent last off season coming off a year where he went 12-9 3.79 ERA 199.2 IP 1.437 WHIP and his best offer was 1yr/$11M from the Nats. Last season he went 10-11 4.03 ERA 189.2 IP 1.218 WHIP and he receives a 4yr/$52M contract. This has been a very strange off season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Keyser Soze wrote:
Here's what I don't understand about this deal. Jackson was a free agent last off season coming off a year where he went 12-9 3.79 ERA 199.2 IP 1.437 WHIP and his best offer was 1yr/$11M from the Nats. Last season he went 10-11 4.03 ERA 189.2 IP 1.218 WHIP and he receives a 4yr/$52M contract. This has been a very strange off season.


I believe he was offered a 3yr/33M contract last year, but took the one-year to get a big payoff from the Cubs this year. It seems like we say the free agent market is strange every year.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Drop In wrote:
It seems like we say the free agent market is strange every year.


Chan Ho Park wrote:
귀하의 창녀 입 닥쳐

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Jackson will have some high strikeout/dominant games, where this move will seem to make some sense, but he's wildly inconsistent and this was a stupid move. I just pray he has enough high quality starts prior to the trade deadline to make him desireable to a contending team that might be stupid enough to trade for this steaming pile of monkey spunk.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79461
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
I don't think the 2013 Cubs are going to be good, but it wouldn't take a whole lot of stuff to break the right way for them to contend in that shitty division. You've got to have guys like Jackson to make it even a possibility. It was a more than reasonable signing.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Jackson will have some high strikeout/dominant games, where this move will seem to make some sense, but he's wildly inconsistent and this was a stupid move. I just pray he has enough high quality starts prior to the trade deadline to make him desireable to a contending team that might be stupid enough to trade for this steaming pile of monkey spunk.


The real frustrating thing about Jackson is that, even when dominating he fucks around on the mound so much that his pitch count is high by the 5-6 inning and burns the bullpen.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79461
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Jackson will have some high strikeout/dominant games, where this move will seem to make some sense, but he's wildly inconsistent and this was a stupid move. I just pray he has enough high quality starts prior to the trade deadline to make him desireable to a contending team that might be stupid enough to trade for this steaming pile of monkey spunk.


The real frustrating thing about Jackson is that, even when dominating he fucks around on the mound so much that his pitch count is high by the 5-6 inning and burns the bullpen.


But guys like that have value. There are less balls put into play. That's the thing about pitching. Guys like Mark Buehrle- and there aren't a lot of them- are unbelievably consistent in hitting spots and doing what they want. But that can only take them so far. Guys like Edwin Jackson and Gavin Floyd, if they can find consistency in their deliveries they have the opportunity to have a special year. And most guys like them do put together that giant season at least once in their careers. The idea is to have them do it for you. I think the Cubs signed Jackson at the right time. They'll probably get his best years. The next team that signs Floyd will probably get his. The Sox will get a draft pick or some minor league bums.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Take Gavin Floyd's cock out of your mouth for just a minute, would ya? He will never have another season like he did in 2008. That was his "giant" season. The next team that signs him will get something like 40-45 wins, 40-45 losses and an ERA right around 4.3-4.5

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79461
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Take Gavin Floyd's cock out of your mouth for just a minute, would ya? He will never have another season like he did in 2008. That was his "giant" season. The next team that signs him will get something like 40-45 wins, 40-45 losses and an ERA right around 4.3-4.5


No, Frank. He will almost definitely have a better season than that.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
He has to have a better ERA, fewer losses, and more wins than he did in 2008. I don't think he compiles a season like that.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57199
Gavin will be 30 when next season starts. It is not like he is on the last couple seasons of his career. I think it is very possible, if not likely he has one season better than that one.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
He could if he gets on the right drugs.

He should call Curt Schilling.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Image

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Gone by July 31st, 2014


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Jackson will have some high strikeout/dominant games, where this move will seem to make some sense, but he's wildly inconsistent and this was a stupid move. I just pray he has enough high quality starts prior to the trade deadline to make him desireable to a contending team that might be stupid enough to trade for this steaming pile of monkey spunk.


Those who defended this signing might want to reconsider their position. This pile of monkey crap has such poor command he gets in trouble more often than Lindsey Lohan on a bender. It was a DUMB signing, as I said in December. Oh, he will have some good outings when he strikes out 10-12 batters and gets a win. But he will have just as many crap outings like this one. Thats why he is 70-72 lifetime with a 4.40 ERA and has been on 8 teams already.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Last edited by Elmhurst Steve on Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Jackson will have some high strikeout/dominant games, where this move will seem to make some sense, but he's wildly inconsistent and this was a stupid move. I just pray he has enough high quality starts prior to the trade deadline to make him desireable to a contending team that might be stupid enough to trade for this steaming pile of monkey spunk.


Those who defended this signing might want to reconsider their position. This pile of monkey crap has such poor command he gets in trouble more often than Lindsey Lohan on a bender.

Topical!



Elmhurst Steve wrote:
It was a DUMB signing, as I said in December. Oh, he will have some good outings when he strikes out 10-12 batters and gets a win. But he will have just as many crap outings like this one. Thats why he is 70-71 lifetime with a 4.40 ERA and has been on 8 teams already.

But he keeps getting traded for highly rated prospects. That's the only hope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Edwin Jackson
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
next cub closer

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group