RPB Vs. Baby McNown

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 30350

Kind of enjoying these little festivities.

viewtopic.php?f=149&t=77025

rogers park bryan · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm **Posts:** 81625

I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 30350

rogers park bryan wrote:

I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?

Not I, all I am saying is that I am enjoying it. Please carry on.

SomeGuy · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:23 pm

Was this thread really necessary?

Terry's Peeps · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:23 pm

rogers park bryan wrote:

I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?

I do. He doesn't ALWAYS blindly support the Democrats. Especially locally.

He is capable of posting his own original thoughts as well.

He's as arrogant as anyone else here.

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 30350

SomeGuy wrote:

Was this thread really necessary?

Are you really necessary here?

SomeGuy · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:25 pm

Hawg Ass wrote:

SomeGuy wrote:

Was this thread really necessary?

Are you really necessary here?

Go fuck yourself.

Don Tiny · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:26 pm

Hawg Ass wrote:

SomeGuy wrote:

Was this thread really necessary?

Are you really necessary here?

A fine rebuttal.

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 30350

SomeGuy wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

SomeGuy wrote:

Was this thread really necessary?

Are you really necessary here?

Go fuck yourself.

I have a headache and I am tired.

Terry's Peeps · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:26 pm

Hawg Ass wrote:

SomeGuy wrote:

Was this thread really necessary?

Are you really necessary here?

Are any of us really necessary here?

Bagels · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:42 pm

rpb tcb

rogers park bryan · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm **Posts:** 81625

Terry's Peeps wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?

I do. He doesn't ALWAYS blindly support the Democrats. Especially locally.

He is capable of posting his own original thoughts as well.

He's as arrogant as anyone else here.

So he sometimes blindly supports them?

Ok. I will concede he is a little more sane on local politics.

At the national level, he is insane and pure democrat.

Oh and not everyone here goes around calling other people stupid, misinformed and saying they should take a civics class. So Id say you're way off there.

Baby McNown · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:51 pm

RPB wrote:

Seacrest · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:51 pm

rogers park bryan wrote:

Terry's Peeps wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?

I do. He doesn't ALWAYS blindly support the Democrats. Especially locally.

He is capable of posting his own original thoughts as well.

He's as arrogant as anyone else here.

So he sometimes blindly supports them?

Ok. I will concede he is a little more sane on local politics.

At the national level, he is insane and pure democrat.

Oh and not everyone here goes around calling other people stupid, misinformed and saying they should take a civics class. So Id say you're way off there.

I don't think he's insane. I know what you are saying though.

Terry's Peeps · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:57 pm

rogers park bryan wrote:

Terry's Peeps wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?

I do. He doesn't ALWAYS blindly support the Democrats. Especially locally.

He is capable of posting his own original thoughts as well.

He's as arrogant as anyone else here.

So he sometimes blindly supports them?

Ok. I will concede he is a little more sane on local politics.

At the national level, he is insane and pure democrat.

Oh and not everyone here goes around calling other people stupid, misinformed and saying they should take a civics class. So Id say you're way off there.

Plenty of people here like to think that they're smarter than everyone else in regards to a certain topic and have no problem posting as such. Zack with Movies, IMU with video games/electronics, JORR with race relations and religion, BRick with everything.

And I wouldn't say the name-calling is arrogant. It's childish, again which everyone here is guilty of from time to time.

RFDC · **Joined:** Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm **Posts:** 57276

Bagels wrote:

rpb tcb

Yep that pretty much sums it up.

Baby McNown · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:05 pm

Seacrest agreeing that I'm arrogant. After his work the last few days in the Catholic threads. Now THAT'S funny.

KDdidit · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:17 pm

rogers park bryan wrote:

I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?

I'm a flaming liberal and I've got BM on ignore.

RFDC · **Joined:** Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm **Posts:** 57276

Baby McNown wrote:

Seacrest agreeing that I'm arrogant. After his work the last few days in the Catholic threads. Now THAT'S funny.

See the difference is Seacrest seems to own the fact that he is an arrogant prick. You don't.

Seacrest · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:22 pm

Baby McNown wrote:

Seacrest agreeing that I'm arrogant. After his work the last few days in the Catholic threads. Now THAT'S funny.

Once again, you are imagining things.

After the way RPB just Pwned you in the politics thread, feel free to hang out in Catholic thread for a while.

rogers park bryan · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm **Posts:** 81625

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Plenty of people here like to think that they're smarter than everyone else in regards to a certain topic and have no problem posting as such. Zack with Movies, IMU with video games/electronics, JORR with race relations and religion, BRick with everything.

Out of those 4, only Zack openly will say "I know more than you" or "Im the expert"

Maybe IMU a little bit. I dont read the gaming section.

But there is a difference between posting confindently and literally saying "you're an idiot. you know nothing. Take a civics class"

I find it hard to believe you dont see the difference.

Baby McNown · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:25 pm

If being Pwnd by somebody is them illustrating a lack of knowledge of facts then sure.

And I've already destroyed you in your Catholic thread. You just ignore post that make you look stupid.

Seacrest · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:25 pm

RFDC wrote:

Baby McNown wrote:

Seacrest agreeing that I'm arrogant. After his work the last few days in the Catholic threads. Now THAT'S funny.

See the difference is Seacrest seems to own the fact that he is an arrogant prick. You don't.

I'm handsome, have a beautiful wife and a lovely family.

And I can type a sentence using proper grammar.

What's not to be arrogant about in these parts?

Baby McNown · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:26 pm

Well you obviously don't comprehend the FL constitution so maybe you should consider it.

rogers park bryan · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm **Posts:** 81625

Here is the deal

I have 3 requests that I think would serve all parties involved well

1) I ask that instead of saying "Youre dumb thats not right" Baby Mac just correct the poster with evidence or links to back it up.

2) My second request is that Baby Mc stop acting like everyone who disagrees with an Obama policy is Rush Limbaugh

3) If he wants to cite an article, post it, instead of complaining that no one else posted it.

I find these requests reasonable. If he chooses not to comply, that's fine.

Those are the issues I have with McNown.

Thank you and Rakim Bless America

Terry's Peeps · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:27 pm

rogers park bryan wrote:

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Plenty of people here like to think that they're smarter than everyone else in regards to a certain topic and have no problem posting as such. Zack with Movies, IMU with video games/electronics, JORR with race relations and religion, BRick with everything.

Out of those 4, only Zack openly will say "I know more than you" or "Im the expert"

Maybe IMU a little bit. I dont read the gaming section.

But there is a difference between posting confindently and literally saying "you're an idiot. you know nothing. Take a civics class"

I find it hard to believe you dont see the difference.

You just called me an idiot. How dare you?!

McNown can be frustrating at times, especially when chas has posted in a thread. Maybe I'm just a fool and try to see the good in everyone.

Baby McNown · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:28 pm

Seacrest wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Baby McNown wrote:

Seacrest agreeing that I'm arrogant. After his work the last few days in the Catholic threads. Now THAT'S funny.

See the difference is Seacrest seems to own the fact that he is an arrogant prick. You don't.

I'm handsome, have a beautiful wife and a lovely family.

And I can type a sentence using proper grammar.

What's not to be arrogant about in these parts?

Show me in Oxford where the word Pwnd is grammar expert. I'll hang up and listen for my answer.

rogers park bryan · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm **Posts:** 81625

Baby McNown wrote:

If being Pwnd by somebody is them illustrating a lack of knowledge of facts then sure.

There were no facts even discussed. Just your posting style and the fact that you think Al Gore won an election that he clearly lost (As evidenced by him not being President)

See, THAT is what Im talking about. Nothing in that thread was about facts. But Baby is gonna just throw that out there because Why Not?

Baby McNown · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:30 pm

rogers park bryan wrote:

Baby McNown wrote:

If being Pwnd by somebody is them illustrating a lack of knowledge of facts then sure.

There were no facts even discussed. Just your posting style and the fact that you think Al Gore won an election that he clearly lost (As evidenced by him not being President)

See, THAT is what Im talking about. Nothing in that thread was about facts. But Baby is gonna just throw that out there because Why Not?

And I posted FACTS as to why you are wrong in that statement.

Terry's Peeps · **Posted:** Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:30 pm

Keeping Score wrote:

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Maybe I'm just a fool and try to see the good in everyone.

The ReVolution in a nutshell.

Probably true.

But I'm okay with that.

RPB Vs. Baby McNown

Who is online