It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Seacrest wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Seacrest agreeing that I'm arrogant. After his work the last few days in the Catholic threads. Now THAT'S funny.



See the difference is Seacrest seems to own the fact that he is an arrogant prick. You don't.


I'm handsome, have a beautiful wife and a lovely family.

And I can type a sentence using proper grammar.

What's not to be arrogant about in these parts?

:lol: Seacrest you are alright with me. I have done a 180 on you. I have went from thinking you are a steaming pile of shit to appreciating your place here and actually agreeing with you a lot of the time.

I think I need a shower.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Plenty of people here like to think that they're smarter than everyone else in regards to a certain topic and have no problem posting as such. Zack with Movies, IMU with video games/electronics, JORR with race relations and religion, BRick with everything.


:lol:

That's comedic gold Fearless Leader.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
rogers park bryan wrote:
Here is the deal

I have 3 requests that I think would serve all parties involved well

1) I ask that instead of saying "Youre dumb thats not right" Baby Mac just correct the poster with evidence or links to back it up.

2) My second request is that Baby Mc stop acting like everyone who disagrees with an Obama policy is Rush Limbaugh

3) If he wants to cite an article, post it, instead of complaining that no one else posted it.


I find these requests reasonable. If he chooses not to comply, that's fine.

Those are the issues I have with McNown.

Thank you and Rakim Bless America

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
RFDC wrote:
:lol: Seacrest you are alright with me. I have done a 180 on you. I have went from thinking you are a steaming pile of shit to appreciating your place here and actually agreeing with you a lot of the time.

I think I need a shower.


Thank you RFDC.

I feel accepted by the cool kids now. Btw, you and Frank are kind of tight.

Anyway you can put in the good word for me with Costanza?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
I have accused Baby McNown of being arrogant, posting talking points, and blindly carrying water for the democratic party

Does ANYONE here disagree with any of that?


Blindly?

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Seacrest wrote:
I'm handsome

Since when have chiropractors started doing plastic surgery?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Douchebag wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
I'm handsome

Since when have chiropractors started doing plastic surgery?


I'm persuasive too.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Baby McNown wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
If being Pwnd by somebody is them illustrating a lack of knowledge of facts then sure.

:lol:

There were no facts even discussed. Just your posting style and the fact that you think Al Gore won an election that he clearly lost (As evidenced by him not being President)


See, THAT is what Im talking about. Nothing in that thread was about facts. But Baby is gonna just throw that out there because Why Not?


And I posted FACTS as to why you are wrong in that statement.

I dont think you understand what FACT means.

Bush won Florida in 2000 is an example of a fact

Bush wouldnt have won if ____ is not a fact.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:46 pm 
Nooooo.... SCOTUS declared him the winner. By FL law he was not the winner.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Baby McNown wrote:
Nooooo.... SCOTUS declared him the winner. By FL law he was not the winner.

So which one trumps the other?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Baby McNown wrote:
Nooooo.... SCOTUS declared him the winner. By FL law he was not the winner.
No. The court said Florida's recount was not legal. They made no such determination of the winner or loser in that state.
Quote:
In a per curiam decision, the Court, by a 7-2 vote, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's method for recounting ballots was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The reason for this was the lack of equal treatment of all the ballots cast in Florida. The Court also ruled that no alternative method could be established within the time limits set by Title 3 of the United States Code (3 U.S.C.), § 5 (Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors), which is December 12. Three concurring justices also asserted that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, § 1, cl. 2 of the Constitution, by misinterpreting Florida election law that had been enacted by the Florida Legislature.

The decision allowed Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris's previous certification of George W. Bush as the winner of Florida's 25 electoral votes to stand. Florida's votes gave Bush, the Republican candidate, 271 electoral votes, one more than the required 270 electoral votes to win the Electoral College and defeat Democratic candidate Al Gore, who received 266 electoral votes (a District of Columbia elector abstained).

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Nooooo.... SCOTUS declared him the winner. By FL law he was not the winner.
No. The court said Florida's recount was not legal. They made no such determination of the winner or loser in that state.
Quote:
In a per curiam decision, the Court, by a 7-2 vote, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's method for recounting ballots was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The reason for this was the lack of equal treatment of all the ballots cast in Florida. The Court also ruled that no alternative method could be established within the time limits set by Title 3 of the United States Code (3 U.S.C.), § 5 (Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors), which is December 12. Three concurring justices also asserted that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, § 1, cl. 2 of the Constitution, by misinterpreting Florida election law that had been enacted by the Florida Legislature.

The decision allowed Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris's previous certification of George W. Bush as the winner of Florida's 25 electoral votes to stand. Florida's votes gave Bush, the Republican candidate, 271 electoral votes, one more than the required 270 electoral votes to win the Electoral College and defeat Democratic candidate Al Gore, who received 266 electoral votes (a District of Columbia elector abstained).



Thanks for posting that Francis.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Gore didn't clearly lose the election. If it was clear it wouldn't have dragged on and needed SCOTUS to make a decision it says shouldn't be used to base any other decisions on. He lost it though, sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
KDdidit wrote:
Gore didn't clearly lose the election. If it was clear it wouldn't have dragged on and needed SCOTUS to make a decision it says shouldn't be used to base any other decisions on. He lost it though, sure.

Once he conceded for a second time, he lost


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
rogers park bryan wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Gore didn't clearly lose the election. If it was clear it wouldn't have dragged on and needed SCOTUS to make a decision it says shouldn't be used to base any other decisions on. He lost it though, sure.

Once he conceded for a second time, he lost

I said he lost.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
KDdidit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Gore didn't clearly lose the election. If it was clear it wouldn't have dragged on and needed SCOTUS to make a decision it says shouldn't be used to base any other decisions on. He lost it though, sure.

Once he conceded for a second time, he lost

I said he lost.

It was clear though once he conceded.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:

Plenty of people here like to think that they're smarter than everyone else in regards to a certain topic and have no problem posting as such. Zack with Movies, IMU with video games/electronics, JORR with race relations and religion, BRick with everything.



:lol: Too funny.

Seriously, I don't think I'm smarter than anyone regarding those topics. I just think I'm more honest about them than most.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30331
I may have to change the title of this thread, it is starting to become a handicapped match.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:

Plenty of people here like to think that they're smarter than everyone else in regards to a certain topic and have no problem posting as such. Zack with Movies, IMU with video games/electronics, JORR with race relations and religion, BRick with everything.



:lol: Too funny.

Seriously, I don't think I'm smarter than anyone regarding those topics. I just think I'm more honest about them than most.
I'm only smarter than the dumb posters on this site. No offense Keeping Score.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
rogers park bryan wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Gore didn't clearly lose the election. If it was clear it wouldn't have dragged on and needed SCOTUS to make a decision it says shouldn't be used to base any other decisions on. He lost it though, sure.

Once he conceded for a second time, he lost

I said he lost.

It was clear though once he conceded.

We have different definitions of clear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Keeping Score wrote:
The ReVolution in a nutshell.


You Son of A......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
rogers park bryan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:

Plenty of people here like to think that they're smarter than everyone else in regards to a certain topic and have no problem posting as such. Zack with Movies, IMU with video games/electronics, JORR with race relations and religion, BRick with everything.

Out of those 4, only Zack openly will say "I know more than you" or "Im the expert"

Maybe IMU a little bit. I dont read the gaming section.


But there is a difference between posting confindently and literally saying "you're an idiot. you know nothing. Take a civics class"

Walt frequently does that too. And his confidence is completely unwarranted.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
:(

Why did you ignore my earlier proposal?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
rogers park bryan wrote:
1) I ask that instead of saying "Youre dumb thats not right" Baby Mac just correct the poster with evidence or links to back it up.

Also applicable to Walt.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Terry's Peeps wrote:
:(

Why did you ignore my earlier proposal?

I don't want certain posters to complain about my innuendo.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
:(

Why did you ignore my earlier proposal?

I don't want certain posters to complain about my innuendo.


But I can still put it innuendo?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
:silent:

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
:silent:


It isn't the amount of the innuendo that counts, Kid, it's how you use it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
SomeGuy wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
:silent:


It isn't the amount of the innuendo that counts, Kid, it's how you use it.

Elaborate. I'm listening.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RPB Vs. Baby McNown
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Seacrest wrote:
I'm handsome, have a beautiful wife and a lovely family.

I agree with you on all three.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group