It is currently Wed Dec 18, 2024 12:28 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 186 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
I like The Stones, but everything post Exile On Main St. is complete garbage.


I go as far as Some Girls.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
rogers park bryan wrote:
Zeppelin
Stones
The Who
Beatles


In THAT order

:cheers:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30468
Douchebag wrote:
You can also add Shattered to my worst songs ever list. The Stones produced a bunch of crap in the 80's.

Whoever said Satisfaction is overrated is 312player dumb.

:lol:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56162
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
doug - evergreen park wrote:
The Beatles are overproduced? 80% of their albums have the sound quality of a fog horn in a metal garbage can being thrown off the Empire State Building.

What the fuck?

The only overproduced Beatles album is Let It Be, which duh Phil Spector. George Martin is one of the greatest producers ever, maybe second only to Eno.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I dont think you can go wrong with Zeppelin, Stones, The Who or The Beatles. I would put the Beatles at the top but those are the top 4 bands of all time. Only the order can be disputed.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56162
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I dont think you can go wrong with Zeppelin, Stones, The Who or The Beatles. I would put the Beatles at the top but those are the top 4 bands of all time. Only the order can be disputed.

The Smiths are up there. Smaller catalogue, but their highs are as high as anyone's. "There Is A Light That Never Goes Out" might be one of the most perfect songs ever written.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92443
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I dont think you can go wrong with Zeppelin, Stones, The Who or The Beatles. I would put the Beatles at the top but those are the top 4 bands of all time. Only the order can be disputed.
So music peaked in the late 70s and not a single band in 30 years has been able to compete?

The idea that the 60s and 70s is some magical musical time and that current bands aren't as good or better is something I'll never understand. It just doesn't make sense to me. You'd think someone would have found a way to be worth something in the last 30 years.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Douchebag wrote:
Start Me Up might be the worst rock song ever written. When I hear it it almost makes me want to hate the part of their catalog that is actually good. It's that bad.

I'll take "Cultural Significance" for $500, Alex.
[img]http://texttheater.]net/wp-content/Windows-95-Screenshot-PlugPlay1.jpg[/img]

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56162
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I dont think you can go wrong with Zeppelin, Stones, The Who or The Beatles. I would put the Beatles at the top but those are the top 4 bands of all time. Only the order can be disputed.
So music peaked in the late 70s and not a single band in 30 years has been able to compete?

The idea that the 60s and 70s is some magical musical time and that current bands aren't as good or better is something I'll never understand. It just doesn't make sense to me. You'd think someone would have found a way to be worth something in the last 30 years.

Every genre does this. Wynton Marsalis is one of the worst offenders of "jazz was only jazz for a few months in 1964 and everything thereafter was just crap." And seemingly no composer is allowed to be as great as Beethoven and Mozart. I never even liked Mozart.

But yeah, while I'll freely admit that many of my favorite acts fall in the 1964-1979 sweet spot (Frank Zappa, Miles Davis, Led Zeppelin, Beatles), I still listen to a lot of '80s-present stuff and enjoy it very much.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15152
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
The Stones suck. You want a good Stones song? Try "You Got the Silver". It's got Keith Richards on main vocals and Ronnie Wood on backing vocals. Nearly every Stones song Jagger sings on is awful. I can put up with "Gimmie Shelter", "Honkey Tonk Woman" and a few other songs where the harmony overcomes bad melody, but other than that you can have the whole thing. I'll stick with the Beatles. If you're going to list them in order, it goes:

Beatles
Led Zepplin
The Kinks
The Who

Notice what these bands all have in common: good to great lead singer(s).

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56162
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Yeah, in terms of Frontmen Who What They Lacked In Singing Made Up For In Being Edgy And Dangerous, it's Lou Reed followed by everyone else. Jagger is just a mincing misogynist. That's the worst kind!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
City of Fools wrote:
The Stones suck. You want a good Stones song? Try "You Got the Silver". It's got Keith Richards on main vocals and Ronnie Wood on backing vocals. Nearly every Stones song Jagger sings on is awful. I can put up with "Gimmie Shelter", "Honkey Tonk Woman" and a few other songs where the harmony overcomes bad melody, but other than that you can have the whole thing. I'll stick with the Beatles. If you're going to list them in order, it goes:

Beatles
Led Zepplin
The Kinks
The Who

Notice what these bands all have in common: good to great lead singer(s).

Boy this is even worse than your basketball thoughts somehow. And I love the Kinks but to say Ray Davies is a great singer is a stretch.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
City of Fools wrote:
The Stones suck. You want a good Stones song? Try "You Got the Silver". It's got Keith Richards on main vocals and Ronnie Wood on backing vocals. Nearly every Stones song Jagger sings on is awful. I can put up with "Gimmie Shelter", "Honkey Tonk Woman" and a few other songs where the harmony overcomes bad melody, but other than that you can have the whole thing. I'll stick with the Beatles. If you're going to list them in order, it goes:

Beatles
Led Zepplin
The Kinks
The Who

Notice what these bands all have in common: good to great lead singer(s).



Oh geeze.........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Start Me Up might be the worst rock song ever written.


Come on, Douchebag! You don't like the song, okay, but you have to admit that's hyperbole. "Start Me Up" is better than the entire Meatloaf canon.


Correct.

Also, Start Me Up is more a pop dance song for the late 70s/early 80s crowd than a rock song, thus why it makes a functionally less-than-attractive rock song.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15152
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
The Stones suck. You want a good Stones song? Try "You Got the Silver". It's got Keith Richards on main vocals and Ronnie Wood on backing vocals. Nearly every Stones song Jagger sings on is awful. I can put up with "Gimmie Shelter", "Honkey Tonk Woman" and a few other songs where the harmony overcomes bad melody, but other than that you can have the whole thing. I'll stick with the Beatles. If you're going to list them in order, it goes:

Beatles
Led Zepplin
The Kinks
The Who

Notice what these bands all have in common: good to great lead singer(s).

Boy this is even worse than your basketball thoughts somehow. And I love the Kinks but to say Ray Davies is a great singer is a stretch.

yeah...so you don't think his voice sounds good on say, "Celluloid Heroes?"

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
The Stones suck. You want a good Stones song? Try "You Got the Silver". It's got Keith Richards on main vocals and Ronnie Wood on backing vocals. Nearly every Stones song Jagger sings on is awful. I can put up with "Gimmie Shelter", "Honkey Tonk Woman" and a few other songs where the harmony overcomes bad melody, but other than that you can have the whole thing. I'll stick with the Beatles. If you're going to list them in order, it goes:

Beatles
Led Zepplin
The Kinks
The Who

Notice what these bands all have in common: good to great lead singer(s).

Boy this is even worse than your basketball thoughts somehow. And I love the Kinks but to say Ray Davies is a great singer is a stretch.

yeah...so you don't think his voice sounds good on say, "Celluloid Heroes?"

We could do this all day. Do you think Mick Jagger's voice sucks on "Angie"? I think they are pretty comprable singers honestly.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
As much as I love Led-Zeppelin, Robert Plant was the weakest link of the 4. His stage presence and his persona moreso than his voice is what made him legendary.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15152
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Phil McCracken wrote:
We could do this all day. Do you think nut Jagger's voice sucks on "Angie"? I think they are pretty comprable singers honestly.

ok...so you're insane.
Frank Costanza wrote:
As much as I love Led-Zeppelin, Robert Plant was the weakest link of the 4. His stage presence and his persona moreso than his voice is what made him legendary.


wait...no, you're insane too.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
We could do this all day. Do you think nut Jagger's voice sucks on "Angie"? I think they are pretty comprable singers honestly.

ok...so you're insane.
Frank Costanza wrote:
As much as I love Led-Zeppelin, Robert Plant was the weakest link of the 4. His stage presence and his persona moreso than his voice is what made him legendary.


wait...no, you're insane too.

:lol: I am not going to break my long standing rule to get involved in musical arguments because it is so subjective. I am heading back to the Kellen Davis thread. Have fun in here errrrybody

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15152
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Robert Plant, at his peak, was the best vocalist among those four bands. Over time, I'd say Roger Daltrey's voice is more impressively there than anyone else, but at times Pete's the best vocalist in that band.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13316
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Curious Hair wrote:
And seemingly no composer is allowed to be as great as Beethoven and Mozart. I never even liked Mozart.

What's so great about Beethoven? Everyone talks about how "great" Beethoven was. Beethoven wasn't so great. He never got his picture on a bubble gum card. How can you say someone is great who's never had his picture on a bubble gum card?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
No, I'm perfectly sane. You go ahead and try to argue that Robert Plant was better at his craft than Jimmy Page, John Paul Jones, or John Bonham.

Daltrey I'll give you, but before he got sick Freddie Mercury was a better singer than the other 3 you initially listed.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Last edited by Frank Coztansa on Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56162
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Frank Coztansa wrote:
You go ahead and try to argue that Robert Plant at his craft than Jimmy Page, John Paul Jones, or John Bonham.

You can't, but that speaks more to the other three's strength than to Plant's relative weakness.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
City of Fools wrote:
The Stones suck. You want a good Stones song? Try "You Got the Silver". It's got Keith Richards on main vocals and Ronnie Wood on backing vocals. Nearly every Stones song Jagger sings on is awful. I can put up with "Gimmie Shelter", "Honkey Tonk Woman" and a few other songs where the harmony overcomes bad melody, but other than that you can have the whole thing. I'll stick with the Beatles. If you're going to list them in order, it goes:

Beatles
Led Zepplin
The Kinks
The Who

Notice what these bands all have in common: good to great lead singer(s).

2 of those bands dont even have ONE dedicated lead singer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Plant was good, no doubt, but his voice was totally shredded and burnt out by the end of LZ.

It was sad listening to him during Live-Aid....and sad in a funny way to see Jimmy Page so fucked up


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15152
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Frank Coztansa wrote:
No, I'm perfectly sane. You go ahead and try to argue that Robert Plant at his craft than Jimmy Page, John Paul Jones, or John Bonham.

Daltrey I'll give you, but before he got sick Freddie Mercury was a better singer than the other 3 you initially listed.

yes, Freddie was better. But Robert had some vocal issues too. Led Zep 1-3 were great but his vocal progressively got worse after that. Yes, I do think before that Plant was an equal partner in that band. They would not have worked at all without him.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15152
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
rogers park bryan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
The Stones suck. You want a good Stones song? Try "You Got the Silver". It's got Keith Richards on main vocals and Ronnie Wood on backing vocals. Nearly every Stones song Jagger sings on is awful. I can put up with "Gimmie Shelter", "Honkey Tonk Woman" and a few other songs where the harmony overcomes bad melody, but other than that you can have the whole thing. I'll stick with the Beatles. If you're going to list them in order, it goes:

Beatles
Led Zepplin
The Kinks
The Who

Notice what these bands all have in common: good to great lead singer(s).

2 of those bands dont even have ONE dedicated lead singer

I'm not sure where that contradicts what I said. The Beatles had three lead singers. All were good, although I'd say both John and George could be sketchy depending on the song. But all three were better than Jagger. Both Pete and Roger were better, far better than Jagger.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
So you have a thing against M. Jagger?

Cool.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
rogers park bryan wrote:
So you have a thing against M. Jagger?

Cool.

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
Please allow me to introduce myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste...


Comparisons like those being made are great for internet debate/fight stuff. I like em all, depends a lot on the mood and environment. Some will fall out of favor for a while then come back.

I seem to remember a I HATE ZEPPELIN or STAIRWAY thread several years back as some believed them to be overplayed. It happens. Wait a couple years and they/it are awesome again. hohum.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 186 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group