Killer V wrote:
My entire point, which I felt I've posted already, is not that he's exempt from whining (just winning). It's just that the things that he's whining about are actually able to be changed. Landmark BS, signage, parking, rooftops, etc. Every last thing can, and most likely will get changed. His whines are part of their overall campaign, including most likely, payoffs, clout, negotiations, and whatever else will work with the city. That's apparently how business is done. The end game is increasing revenue and modernizing the ballpark.
It's totally different when you move in next to the ballpark. As I've said, you don't move there expecting peace & quiet, just like moving into a house in an O'Hare flight path. You've chosen to move there, you didn't have to (I lived there for a few years). So no, I don't believe you get to bitch about the noise, traffic, & people. And even if you do bitch, what is your end game? The only solution to your complaint is to force the Cubs to move away. But then it's not exactly the Wrigleyville you chose to move into, is it?
And really? Playing off your board persona of knowing everyone and having experienced everything is considered "getting personal?" Then I'm offended by raccoons & missed layups!
I think the end game is to have some control or say so over what is happening in a neighborhood where you are paying taxes. That's all. And that's really no different than what Ricketts is doing.
Anyway, I completely understand the Cubs fans (most of whom live far away) saying, "Who cares? Let Ricketts run his business! If it gives the Cubs billions to sign Cabrera, Pujols, and Hamilton, fuck the hotel, let Tommy build a seven story strip club and casino." I understand that fan perspective. But getting past the emotion, anyone with a brain has to know that's a moronic thought, and of course there are limitations on what any business can do. That's what's so strange about bernstein espousing the idea. It's about as meatballish as it gets.