It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I support second amendment rights but this "If we ban guns we have to ban every physical thing that's ever been near a crime" is pretty silly.

We don't need to ban guns but that kind of comparison isn't helping


BAN THIS ARGUMENT

Nonsense.
I've said all along, guns are a tool. nothing more, nothing less.
You can ban em, background check em, but none of that would make these marathoners any safer.

I think banning arguments, RPB, is much much more dangerous than banning guns for what it's worth.
A little satire is a wonderful tool for showing just how damn silly an idealism can be, such as gun bans.

Yes guns are a tool. A tool that he's abused resulting in death so I'm all for stringent regulation

There is no apt comparison with guns. Its a unique issue.

And my BAN THIS ARGUMENT was also satire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65779
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Yes guns are a tool. A tool that he's abused resulting in death so I'm all for stringent regulation

There is no apt comparison with guns. Its a unique issue.

And my BAN THIS ARGUMENT was also satire

I will admit that I am fearful of the people who will be in charge of the regulation. I don't trust them.

Obama said today that no one is safer as a result of the failure of the bill. I submit that no one truly would have been safer with the passage of the bill. That's my opinion.

And I love your satire.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Darkside wrote:
I will admit that I am fearful of the people who will be in charge of the regulation. I don't trust them.

Obama said today that no one is safer as a result of the failure of the bill. I submit that no one truly would have been safer with the passage of the bill. That's my opinion.

And I love your satire.



You can have my +1 (euphemism) on all three points.

Obama was a petulant child today because his side lost. Completely reprehensible showboating, even for a politician.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I'm not a gun owner so I haven't thought much about it but what is the fear of the list? How would it be used?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65779
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
rogers park bryan wrote:
I'm not a gun owner so I haven't thought much about it but what is the fear of the list? How would it be used?

Well, it's not really the "list" I'm fearful of. Although I would submit that my name being released as a FOID owner along with my address (like our own AG wanted to do) would make me a target for crime.

I am more fearful of the people that want so desperately to disarm me. The government that has no problem keeping us addicted to oil, and subjected to billions of dollars worth of advertising of pills we don't need, and a government that poisoned crestwood, and a government that killed the electric car in leiu of keeping us in environment killing machines suddenly cares so much for me?
I don't buy it.
I am fearful of a government that exists simply to further our dependence upon it.
I am fearful of a government that wages war against not just countries... but also ideas. "Wars" on drugs that do little more than imprison a larger percentage of our population that almost every other country in the world and further addiction and racial inequity.
I'm fearful of the idea that we're perpetuating that no one is safe without goverment intervention. That no one can protect us unless they're appointed or elected.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23857
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Darkside wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I'm not a gun owner so I haven't thought much about it but what is the fear of the list? How would it be used?

Well, it's not really the "list" I'm fearful of. Although I would submit that my name being released as a FOID owner along with my address (like our own AG wanted to do) would make me a target for crime.

I know if I was a criminal I'd target gun owners. I'd also target MMA fighters, people with beware of dog signs, those who live next door to police stations, and anyone with "protected by ADT" things stuck to the windows.

Forgot paroled convicted murderers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55966
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Costco must have had a sale on logical fallacies today.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Colonel Angus wrote:
I think there will be a point where nobody's allowed to carry anything on them & they have to wear skintight bodysuits.

I grew up in the parachute pants days, and that is not good.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Colonel Angus wrote:
I think there will be a point where nobody's allowed to carry anything on them & they have to wear skintight bodysuits.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I'm not a gun owner so I haven't thought much about it but what is the fear of the list? How would it be used?

Well, it's not really the "list" I'm fearful of. Although I would submit that my name being released as a FOID owner along with my address (like our own AG wanted to do) would make me a target for crime.

I am more fearful of the people that want so desperately to disarm me. The government that has no problem keeping us addicted to oil, and subjected to billions of dollars worth of advertising of pills we don't need, and a government that poisoned crestwood, and a government that killed the electric car in leiu of keeping us in environment killing machines suddenly cares so much for me?
I don't buy it.
I am fearful of a government that exists simply to further our dependence upon it.
I am fearful of a government that wages war against not just countries... but also ideas. "Wars" on drugs that do little more than imprison a larger percentage of our population that almost every other country in the world and further addiction and racial inequity.
I'm fearful of the idea that we're perpetuating that no one is safe without goverment intervention. That no one can protect us unless they're appointed or elected.

I see your point of view even though I dont share it exactly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I know DS is being face..faesis...kidding but maybe one solution is to incorporate some type of
unique identification that can be tracked by police with a scanner. I'm sure they can incorporate some slight thing in the paint or something making it unique to pressure cookers.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Pressure cookers should be banned, I agree.

They were obviously designed to be deadly weapons.

Guns are tools. No different than a tape measure or an allen wrench.

This thread really put things in perspective for me...

_________________
This is my signature...


Last edited by Krazy Ivan on Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Krazy Ivan wrote:
This thread really put thingsi n perspective for me...


kujoe Ivan...

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
This thread really put thingsi n perspective for me...


kujoe Ivan...


yep

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Don Tiny wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I will admit that I am fearful of the people who will be in charge of the regulation. I don't trust them.

Obama said today that no one is safer as a result of the failure of the bill. I submit that no one truly would have been safer with the passage of the bill. That's my opinion.

And I love your satire.



You can have my +1 (euphemism) on all three points.

Obama was a petulant child today because his side lost. Completely reprehensible showboating, even for a politician.


I'm with The Don and DS.

+34


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Colonel Angus wrote:
I think there will be a point where nobody's allowed to carry anything on them & they have to wear skintight bodysuits.


That is why people from the future always wear one piece jumpsuits with no pockets.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
If the bill wouldnt have made anyone safer because Evil people will find another tool, then why have background checks at all?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
rogers park bryan wrote:
If the bill wouldnt have made anyone safer because Evil people will find another tool, then why have background checks at all?


Yeah. Why have any safety meassures for that matter?

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
Krazy Ivan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If the bill wouldnt have made anyone safer because Evil people will find another tool, then why have background checks at all?


Yeah. Why have any safety meassures for that matter?

I think we should get rid of all bans on people owning grenades, rocket launchers, and landmines.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Douchebag wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If the bill wouldnt have made anyone safer because Evil people will find another tool, then why have background checks at all?


Yeah. Why have any safety meassures for that matter?

I think we should get rid of all bans on people owning grenades, rocket launchers, and landmines.


We should trust that they are responsible enough to know when and how to use their rocket launchers. We should also make sure that every citizen is able to own said rocket launcher to protect themselves from rocket launcher attacks from........other rocket.....launcher..........oweners

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
I'm surprised I didn't say this yet but...

...fuck guns.

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If the bill wouldnt have made anyone safer because Evil people will find another tool, then why have background checks at all?


Yeah. Why have any safety meassures for that matter?

I think we should get rid of all bans on people owning grenades, rocket launchers, and landmines.


I can tell that you're being facetious so let me drop a little knowledge on you. Rocket launchers and their ilk are designed to take out today's "super animals" like the flying squirrel or electric eel.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
SpiralStairs wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If the bill wouldnt have made anyone safer because Evil people will find another tool, then why have background checks at all?


Yeah. Why have any safety meassures for that matter?

I think we should get rid of all bans on people owning grenades, rocket launchers, and landmines.


I can tell that you're being facetious so let me drop a little knowledge on you. Rocket launchers and their ilk are designed to take out today's "super animals" like the flying squirrel or electric eel.

I'm being 100% serious. There shouldn't be any restrictions on any weapons. Are you against the 2nd amendment?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
I'm being 100% serious. There shouldn't be any restrictions on any weapons. Are you against the 2nd amendment?


I'm against it in the sense that it's not permissive enough. I don't see where in the Constitution is says I can't have a gun that shoots knives, but every time I go down to the patent office Uncle Sam keeps turning me down.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Douchebag wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If the bill wouldnt have made anyone safer because Evil people will find another tool, then why have background checks at all?


Yeah. Why have any safety meassures for that matter?

I think we should get rid of all bans on people owning grenades, rocket launchers, and landmines.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
SpiralStairs wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
I'm being 100% serious. There shouldn't be any restrictions on any weapons. Are you against the 2nd amendment?


I'm against it in the sense that it's not permissive enough. I don't see where in the Constitution is says I can't have a gun that shoots knives, but every time I go down to the patent office Uncle Sam keeps turning me down.

Where in the constitution does it say I can't own any particular weapon?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
I'm being 100% serious. There shouldn't be any restrictions on any weapons. Are you against the 2nd amendment?


I'm against it in the sense that it's not permissive enough. I don't see where in the Constitution is says I can't have a gun that shoots knives, but every time I go down to the patent office Uncle Sam keeps turning me down.

Where in the constitution does it say I can't own any particular weapon?


Oh it doesn't but some pencil necked bureaucrat keeps telling me my invention doesn't fall within the traditional definition of "arms" and is more a "aggressively impractical crime against humanity".

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Last edited by SpiralStairs on Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
It seems the Official Herp Derp Circle Jerk as finally begun in earnest.

Only took 3 pages, though. Impressive.

To be too rough, dudes and be sure to use the :lol: emoticon liberally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
SomeGuy wrote:
It seems the Official Herp Derp Circle Jerk as finally begun in earnest.

Only took 3 pages, though. Impressive.

To be too rough, dudes and be sure to use the :lol: emoticon liberally.

Where in the constitution does it say that certain arms are not allowed, but others are okay?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ban Pressure Cookers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
SomeGuy wrote:
It seems the Official Herp Derp Circle Jerk as finally begun in earnest.

Only took 3 pages, though. Impressive.

To be too rough, dudes and be sure to use the :lol: emoticon liberally.


You just have to rally the troops so we can get a nice, heathy counter-jerk going.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group