It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
good dolphin wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I consider LBJ and D-Howard's situations much worse.
Rose is choosing not to play when the biggest experts in the world on the subject think he should. Could you imagine the uproar if Lebron decided he didn't feel like playing and skipped the playoffs?


what do you feel is the benefit to him playing now?


The Bulls winning a playoff series.

What do you feel are the detriments?


IF he isn't 100% (physically healthy) then obviously some kind of re-injury
I guess my only argument is that if he's 85% healthy, I have no issue with him sitting and coming back 100% next year since this year is a wash anyways
If he is in fact 100% healthy and its just a mental things, then yes obviously he should be out there


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82241
Bagels wrote:
IF he isn't 100% (physically healthy) then obviously some kind of re-injury
I guess my only argument is that if he's 85% healthy, I have no issue with him sitting and coming back 100% next year since this year is a wash anyways
If he is in fact 100% healthy and its just a mental things, then yes obviously he should be out there


I guess this gets to the crux of the matter. Unless there is a subsequent injury, he is physically healthy. It really isn't even within the boundaries of probability anymore that he isn't fully healed.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23844
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Nobody else is 100% (maybe VladRad is), why should Rose be special. I think Rose would be okay with playing this series. He knows he'd look like a hero if he came back, but he also knows he'd get his shit pushed in in the next series so he chickens out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Wherever in the world has it ever been acceptable (from a good teammate's perspective) NOT to play if you're ONLY 85-90 percent? If it's a close playoff series with my teammates showing amazing levels of heart, I'd feel empty sitting and waiting on the mythical 110%.

I never thought I'd question this kid's heart. His head, yes occasionally, but not his desire to play and/or support his teammates. I'm moving shockingly close to joining the "Trade Derrick" camp.

I certainly will not spend dime the first on any Addidas products.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
good dolphin wrote:
Bagels wrote:
IF he isn't 100% (physically healthy) then obviously some kind of re-injury
I guess my only argument is that if he's 85% healthy, I have no issue with him sitting and coming back 100% next year since this year is a wash anyways
If he is in fact 100% healthy and its just a mental things, then yes obviously he should be out there


I guess this gets to the crux of the matter. Unless there is a subsequent injury, he is physically healthy. It really isn't even within the boundaries of probability anymore that he isn't fully healed.


well i don't want to play Panthro here with the 'not believing anything' angle, but the whole situation has been handled shady so i'm not sure what to believe
i have to go with the fact that he's been medically cleared, so he should be playing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He needs to get acclimated to competitive NBA basketball.


That's what the next pre-season will be for. He will get back into the swing of things and ready for the season.

It's clear that he decided that this season and post season were never even under concideration. Which I'm fine with. It's a terrible injury that costs most people a full season. But the only error he made, in my mind, was not being forthcoming about it. Giving the illusion that there was some possibility of playing. He shouldn't hae done that. Not DB worthy, imo. Just a misstep...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
The whole "percentage healthy" thing makes no sense to me. I find it to be a lazy excuse athletes use to say they don't want to play or they're too scared of re-injury. My whole opinion rests on the timing of Rose's pending return. At this point, I'd say it's smarter to have him sit until next season.

I admit I'm a pessimist in this discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
The whole "percentage healthy" thing makes no sense to me. I find it to be a lazy excuse athletes use to say they don't want to play or they're too scared of re-injury. My whole opinion rests on the timing of Rose's pending return. At this point, I'd say it's smarter to have him sit until next season.

I admit I'm a pessimist in this discussion.


I agree with 84% of this post...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
If he is in fact 100% healthy and its just a mental things, then yes obviously he should be out there
If he's not 100% healthy now then he never will be.

It's just mental now, and those mental issues will be there all offseason which limits how he can work.

That was what was so amazing about Adrian Peterson. He seemed to have no mental issues in regards to his surgery. He ran from day one like it never happened. Most people aren't so lucky. Given that Rose isn't playing because he doesn't feel ready, it's a huge concern.

It's the cliched "Get back on the horse" issue for him now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He needs to get acclimated to competitive NBA basketball.


That's what the next pre-season will be for. He will get back into the swing of things and ready for the season.

It's clear that he decided that this season and post season were never even under concideration. Which I'm fine with. It's a terrible injury that costs most people a full season. But the only error he made, in my mind, was not being forthcoming about it. Giving the illusion that there was some possibility of playing. He shouldn't hae done that. Not DB worthy, imo. Just a misstep...


I agree with all of that and I"m ok with it
Like DB has mentioned before, i'm sure it was more the Bulls as an organization than him dropping comeback hints in order to keep ticket sales going


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
If he is in fact 100% healthy and its just a mental things, then yes obviously he should be out there
If he's not 100% healthy now then he never will be.

It's just mental now, and those mental issues will be there all offseason which limits how he can work.

That was what was so amazing about Adrian Peterson. He seemed to have no mental issues in regards to his surgery. He ran from day one like it never happened. Most people aren't so lucky. Given that Rose isn't playing because he doesn't feel ready, it's a huge concern.

It's the cliched "Get back on the horse" issue for him now.


are you a doctor? how can you make such a proclamation?
the only reason i give a slight benefit of the doubt here is that it's a pretty complicated and serious injury...if it was (example) a strained hamstring and 99.9% of players come back in 2 weeks and he's 2 months, ok. but i'm just not sure arguing that because Shumpert came back already and Rose didn't something is amiss, their injuries are not going to be 100% the same


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Krazy Ivan wrote:
It's a terrible injury that costs most people a full season.

Is that true?

I know the guy who got hurt the same day as him has been back a while and it has been over a calender year now


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
Krazy Ivan wrote:
That's what the next pre-season will be for. He will get back into the swing of things and ready for the season.
That still means that it will effect his workouts all offseason. Also, preseason games aren't played at the same level or intensity. It will slow down his progress next year without question.

Krazy Ivan wrote:
It's clear that he decided that this season and post season were never even under concideration. Which I'm fine with. It's a terrible injury that costs most people a full season. But the only error he made, in my mind, was not being forthcoming about it. Giving the illusion that there was some possibility of playing. He shouldn't hae done that. Not DB worthy, imo. Just a misstep...
So would you be fine if he chose to sit out next season too? I know he won't, but it's the same concept.

He is choosing not to play. It's as simple as that. Doctors didn't rush him back. If anything, they were cautious with him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
This guy is DB of the century.

1700s: King of England
1800s: Southerners
1900s: Hitler
2000s: Derek Rose


Corrected as follows:

1700s: Slave owning Founders
1800s: Mark Twain for using politically incorrect language
1900s: Wicked Witch of the West
2000s: Jo Pa

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So would you be fine if he chose to sit out next season too? I know he won't, but it's the same concept.


how is that the same concept?
so if you are late on your credit card payment by 15 days or by 6 months its the same thing?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23844
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
He's not going to be 100% until he plays a game. He's not going to play a game until he's 100%. Does he not see the flaw in his thought process?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:04 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
KDdidit wrote:
He's not going to be 100% until he plays a game. He's not going to play a game until he's 100%. Does he not see the flaw in his thought process?


Sadly, I'm not so sure he's the only person who can make this decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:05 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
good dolphin wrote:
It won't but it is the same stain as 1.8.
Scottie won titles before and after that.

This will be a far greater stain than 1.8 unless the Bulls-- with Rose for 70+ games and playoffs-- win the title.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
are you a doctor? how can you make such a proclamation?
There is a time period where healing occurs after any surgery. For this one, it's not more than a year. It's less than a year with extra time given for safety. They also have tests and he's passed all of them. I'm not a doctor, but neither is Rose.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
the 1.8 was a heat of the moment decision. Derek has had months to think about refusing to play.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So would you be fine if he chose to sit out next season too? I know he won't, but it's the same concept.


how is that the same concept?
so if you are late on your credit card payment by 15 days or by 6 months its the same thing?
He's still choosing to sit out games when he's considered healthy to play. All we are adding is more games missed. That's why it's the same concept.

It's a fact that Rose is actively choosing not to play. He is making the decision. Doctors aren't. The team isn't. He is.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's a fact that Rose is actively choosing not to play. He is making the decision. Doctors aren't. The team isn't. He is.


how is that a fact? can you point me to the conclusive evidence that this is the case?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:11 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
I'm honestly surprised at how severe people are making Rose's inactivity seem in the grand scheme of his career.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's a fact that Rose is actively choosing not to play. He is making the decision. Doctors aren't. The team isn't. He is.


how is that a fact? can you point me to the conclusive evidence that this is the case?

Hasnt the doctor and team both cleared him?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:13 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's a fact that Rose is actively choosing not to play. He is making the decision. Doctors aren't. The team isn't. He is.


how is that a fact? can you point me to the conclusive evidence that this is the case?

Hasnt the doctor and team both cleared him?


Yes. There is no question the decision is up to Rose's camp.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
i would have to assume that the team wants him out there...not only to win games but to sell tickets
if they have cleared him and he's refusing to play wouldn't this get far nastier? i mean if he's flat out refusing to play when able to couldn't the suspend him, take back game pay, etc. ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's a fact that Rose is actively choosing not to play. He is making the decision. Doctors aren't. The team isn't. He is.


how is that a fact? can you point me to the conclusive evidence that this is the case?
It's been reported that doctors and the team have cleared him. Also, while Rose hasn't said much, his comments make it pretty clear that he doesn't feel he is ready to play. That means it is his decision that he isn't playing.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
Yes, I am going to finally go meatball on this topic.

You would think he would be ashamed to sit there on that bench while his teammates are battling through exodus levels of plagues to win this series.

That's not really a meatball thought. At this point, it's probably fair to say those still defending Rose are the meatballs. There's not one logical reason to defend what he's doing. He deserves every criticism leveled towards him over this.

I also agree that people won't easily forgive and forget when he comes back and dunks. BRick is right, he is refusing to enter games when he is healthy enough to play. That's basically a cardinal sin in every sport.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:22 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
I also agree that people won't easily forgive and forget when he comes back and dunks. BRick is right, he is refusing to enter games when he is healthy enough to play. That's basically a cardinal sin in every sport.
Absolutely. Especially when his teammates are currently playing through injuries and sickness.


Jay Cutler was essentially slaughtered in the media and on sportsradio for doing something far less egregious in the NFC title game a couple years back.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek Rose
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Yes, I am going to finally go meatball on this topic.

You would think he would be ashamed to sit there on that bench while his teammates are battling through exodus levels of plagues to win this series.

That's not really a meatball thought. At this point, it's probably fair to say those still defending Rose are the meatballs. There's not one logical reason to defend what he's doing. He deserves every criticism leveled towards him over this.

I also agree that people won't easily forgive and forget when he comes back and dunks. BRick is right, he is refusing to enter games when he is healthy enough to play. That's basically a cardinal sin in every sport.


let me clarify , i want him out there and if he's healthy he should be

but i also don't think this is so heinous of an offense as others do, and i still think there could be something going on that we're not aware of since the whole situation has been shrouded in mystery and lies


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group