It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 10:07 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 3895
Location: Ninjas
pizza_Place: Perry's Deli Home of the Swaggie
It's true, It's true !!

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/ ... -episodes/

It's been teased for so long, I figured after this long there was no chance.

----------------


Captain Ahab had Moby-Dick; Linus van Pelt had the Great Pumpkin; and, in the five years since “Arrested Development” has gone off the air, fans of that underdog Fox comedy series have spent their lives pining for a film adaptation that would further the adventures of its deeply dysfunctional Bluth clan.

Mitchell Hurwitz, the creator of “Arrested Development,” and cast members including Jason Bateman, Will Arnett and Michael Cera have also done their part to keep hopes of a movie alive, mentioning the project in numerous interviews, often along with apologies for why it still wasn’t happening yet.

On Sunday afternoon, Mr. Hurwitz tossed a few more crumbs to the “Arrested Development” faithful at a New Yorker Festival event that reunited him with the show’s ensemble cast, telling the audience that a movie was still in the works, along with a new set of television episodes that would serve as a prelude to the film.

Asked by the event’s moderator, Nancy Franklin, for an update on the movie, Mr. Hurwitz said, “We’re 80 percent of the way to an answer,” which was understandably greeted by some laughter.

Mr. Hurwitz went on to say that he and Ron Howard, the director and producer who was the “Arrested Development” narrator, “had been talking about this for ages and trying to get this going.”

Mr. Hurwitz continued: “We don’t completely own the property, there are business people involved and studios and that kind of thing. Just creatively, I have been working on the screenplay for a long time and found that as time went by, there was so much more to the story. In fact, where everyone’s been for five years became a big part of the story. So in working on the screenplay, I found even if I just gave five minutes per character to that back story, we were halfway through the movie before the characters got together.”

So, Mr. Hurwitz said, “We’re trying to do a limited-run series into the movie.” After a wave of excited applause died down, he continued, “We’re basically hoping to do nine or 10 episodes, with almost one character per episode.”

The first episode, he said, could focus on Buster Bluth, the deeply neurotic brother played by Tony Hale. “The latest joke we have,” Mr. Hurwitz said, “is that it’s Cambridge, Mass., and there’s all these scientists in lab coats and they’re waiting for somebody. Buster comes through the door in a white lab coat – ‘Let’s begin’ – and they say, ‘Oh, no, you don’t get to wear the lab coat. We’re experimenting on you.’ ”

Assuming Mr. Hurwitz and his “Arrested Development” confederates are not performing their own experiment on their fan base, he said he was about halfway through a screenplay with his co-writers Jim Vallely and Dean Lorey, but did not specify a studio for either the movie or television components, or a network that might broadcast the new episodes. The project, he said, “requires studios to work together that don’t typically work together, film and TV.”

Mr. Bateman, who played Michael Bluth, the lone, sane member of the family, said: “There’s business left to be done, but creatively we are all on board and have a very specific plan about how it would come out and what we would do and when we would shoot it. I think we’re targeting next summer to shoot it.”

Mr. Hurwitz added, “Perhaps the series is in the fall. This isn’t my decision.”

By way of apology, Mr. Hurwitz also said that while he and the “Arrested Development” team had intimated in the past that the movie wasn’t coming together because Mr. Cera – who has since been propelled into leading roles in films like “Superbad” and “Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World” – was standing in the way, this had all been an inside joke gone wrong.

“I kind of was perpetuating a little thing, like, wouldn’t it be funny if Michael Cera was the holdout. Let’s put that out there. And Michael had that Andy Kaufman thing. And then it really turned ugly, quickly. So I really just have to say, for those of you that have been following this saga, Michael’s always been great.”

Just when it seemed everyone had made amends and cleared their schedules, Mr. Cera piped in: “Actually, I do have a thing.”

Later on Sunday, Mr. Bateman posted the following message on his Twitter account:

It’s true. We will do 10 episodes and the movie. Probably shoot them all together next summer for a release in early ‘13. VERY excited!Sun Oct 02 22:42:23 via Twitter for iPhoneJason Bateman
batemanjason

_________________
Drop In wrote:
I'm picturing a 12 year old Bob Loblaw bitching out a Randy Savage Wrestling Buddy for botching his finisher. Also envisioning Bob Loblaw getting bitched at for lighting the living room table on fire for said finisher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37840
Location: ...
maybe there is a god afterall. now if only "whitney" could get cancelled.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 3895
Location: Ninjas
pizza_Place: Perry's Deli Home of the Swaggie
:lol: :lol:

let's not get greedy now

_________________
Drop In wrote:
I'm picturing a 12 year old Bob Loblaw bitching out a Randy Savage Wrestling Buddy for botching his finisher. Also envisioning Bob Loblaw getting bitched at for lighting the living room table on fire for said finisher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:07 pm
Posts: 25
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Its about time. So many teases over the years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 3922
Location: Right here
pizza_Place: nowhere
All is right in TV Land again

_________________
"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
W_Z wrote:
. now if only "whitney" could get cancelled.

done


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
this has led to me watching IFC the past two weeks, and quickly switching the channel during their "commercials".

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
City of Fools wrote:
this has led to me watching IFC the past two weeks, and quickly switching the channel during their "commercials".

Been on a Netflix run trying to catch up. Just a few episodes left


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43576
rogers park bryan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
this has led to me watching IFC the past two weeks, and quickly switching the channel during their "commercials".

Been on a Netflix run trying to catch up. Just a few episodes left

Same here, I just started the third season, so I need to finish up soon.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I hope they play this show out for all the unawares out there, not just the fan base. I'd love to see this thing succeed beyond the base level.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Watched 5 episodes sunday and yesterday.

Still very good, but different.

Id say Portia de Rossi looks the most different.

Also, not sure Im in favor of actors playing young George and his wife. I thought they did well as themselves in those flashbacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:

Id say Portia de Rossi looks the most different.



Think you're being funny, but yea, the jokes about her appearance are the best part for me so far. I thought episodes 1-3 were actually bad, but 4-5 picked up and it's better since then. I think they lost some of the subtle tone, and that's the biggest difference for me. Took some adjusting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bucky Chris wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

Id say Portia de Rossi looks the most different.



Think you're being funny, but yea, the jokes about her appearance are the best part for me so far. I thought episodes 1-3 were actually bad, but 4-5 picked up and it's better since then. I think they lost some of the subtle tone, and that's the biggest difference for me. Took some adjusting.

Im not being funny. Have there been a lot of jokes about her appearance? I think I remember one.

I really havent paid attention to her career, but yeah, she looks waaaay different.

You're right it is less subtle. That's not a good thing. But like Barry Zuckerkorn, its still very good


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

Id say Portia de Rossi looks the most different.



Think you're being funny, but yea, the jokes about her appearance are the best part for me so far. I thought episodes 1-3 were actually bad, but 4-5 picked up and it's better since then. I think they lost some of the subtle tone, and that's the biggest difference for me. Took some adjusting.

Im not being funny. Have there been a lot of jokes about her appearance? I think I remember one.

I really havent paid attention to her career, but yeah, she looks waaaay different.

You're right it is less subtle. That's not a good thing. But like Barry Zuckerkorn, its still very good


Yes, maybe you haven't gotten to her episode. Her boyfriend is a guy who can't recognize her face, numerous nose jokes, wigs, haircuts, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bucky Chris wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

Id say Portia de Rossi looks the most different.



Think you're being funny, but yea, the jokes about her appearance are the best part for me so far. I thought episodes 1-3 were actually bad, but 4-5 picked up and it's better since then. I think they lost some of the subtle tone, and that's the biggest difference for me. Took some adjusting.

Im not being funny. Have there been a lot of jokes about her appearance? I think I remember one.

I really havent paid attention to her career, but yeah, she looks waaaay different.

You're right it is less subtle. That's not a good thing. But like Barry Zuckerkorn, its still very good


Yes, maybe you haven't gotten to her episode. Her boyfriend is a guy who can't recognize her face, numerous nose jokes, wigs, haircuts, etc.

Oh, yeah ok. I was kinda fallin asleep on that one. The "acting class" they go to.


Also, it seems like they probably had a hard time getting all these people together and that's why the episodes focus on a few of them. The old episodes seemed like everyone was in every one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
the article in this thread states that the wanted to update every character's whereabouts in the movie but they took too long to do each one, so they accomplished that with these episodes to lead into a movie. Therefore it doesn't thread them all together as much. Haven't seen them yet but that was one of the strengths of the show. The ability to tie multiple threads and characters together, ala Seinfeld at its best. I think the movie will be worth watching.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
City of Fools wrote:
the article in this thread states that the wanted to update every character's whereabouts in the movie but they took too long to do each one, so they accomplished that with these episodes to lead into a movie. Therefore it doesn't thread them all together as much. Haven't seen them yet but that was one of the strengths of the show. The ability to tie multiple threads and characters together, ala Seinfeld at its best. I think the movie will be worth watching.

It seems that way at first, but the tie ins come eventually.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Very busy weekend so I only saw the first one. Thought it was OK. I dont like only focusing on one character each episode but I am glad it's finally back.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:24 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16819
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Started watching this over the weekend. First episode was ok, second episode was awful.


Not surprised considering how overrated this show has become in its absence. The first season was great and it was all downhill from there, season 3 was unwatchable.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
shakes wrote:
Started watching this over the weekend. First episode was ok, second episode was awful.


Not surprised considering how overrated this show has become in its absence. The first season was great and it was all downhill from there, season 3 was unwatchable.

I thought season 3 was hilarious and the show's popularity didnt change much in its absence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43576
shakes wrote:
Not surprised considering how overrated this show has become in its absence.

What does that even mean? :scratch:

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Douchebag wrote:
shakes wrote:
Not surprised considering how overrated this show has become in its absence.

What does that even mean? :scratch:

Its possible. Its happened with other shows, but AD pretty much always had a cult following and its about the same.

At least that's how it seems to me.


Shakes is a professional TV critic though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I thought the show took a little while to find itself, I'm not a fan of the first couple episodes of season one. I thought season 2 was overall the best but I didn't think season 3 dipped that much. I'm not a fan overall of David Cross and felt his over the top stuff did come more to the front in season 3 but I still thought it was good...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Just started on this show a couple weeks ago. I'm halfway through Season 2. Almost lost my shit with the Christmas Party episode in S2 with afternoon delight and delite and Buster operating the crane. Amazing payoff.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
rogers park bryan wrote:
shakes wrote:
Started watching this over the weekend. First episode was ok, second episode was awful.


Not surprised considering how overrated this show has become in its absence. The first season was great and it was all downhill from there, season 3 was unwatchable.

I thought season 3 was hilarious and the show's popularity didnt change much in its absence.

I've noticed more people talking about it in its absence than in its presence, and the Mr. F/Mentally Retarded Female storyline from the third season was absurd and not in the good way.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Curious Hair wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
shakes wrote:
Started watching this over the weekend. First episode was ok, second episode was awful.


Not surprised considering how overrated this show has become in its absence. The first season was great and it was all downhill from there, season 3 was unwatchable.

I thought season 3 was hilarious and the show's popularity didnt change much in its absence.

I've noticed more people talking about it in its absence than in its presence, and the Mr. F/Mentally Retarded Female storyline from the third season was absurd and not in the good way.

To each their own I suppose.

Bob Loblaw and the Blue Man group were both season 3 things I thought worked well. And there was plenty of absurdity in the first two seasons.

Ive always seen a vocal minority of people talk up the show. It didnt really ramp up in its absence, unless you're talking about the last few months as the new season approached, which would be expected.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group