It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:23 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:47 pm
Posts: 101
pizza_Place: Pagliai's Iowa City
Even though I agree with Dan’s premise on Urlacher being the better player, he stated yesterday that one of the main reasons for this opinion is Butka never won anything during his time as a Bear.

However, Urlacher never won a Super Bowl, and Dan has stated frequently on the show that titles are the only thing that matter. By that definition, wouldn’t the two players have had the exact same amount of success?

We measure success by banners and parades in this town. Big boy football, not wine & cheese football.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
These guys are so damn dumb. It was a totally different game back then. Urlacher was never a fearsome run stuffer, pressure up the middle guy. That's what the job was back in the 60s.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:26 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Urlacher isn't in the same league as Butkus. Butkus is one of the best five defensive players in the history of the game. dan is ridiculous.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
With this or especially with basketball these two obviously only compare the athletic ability. Worse yet they compare older generation players to recent ones. When I do these things I prefer to look at their status among those closer to their generation.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38353
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Urlacher isn't in the same league as Butkus. Butkus is one of the best five defensive players in the history of the game. dan is ridiculous.


Thank you

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Well if Dan says it, his minions believe it.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
CharlieFurbush wrote:
Even though I agree with Dan’s premise on Urlacher being the better player, he stated yesterday that one of the main reasons for this opinion is Butka never won anything during his time as a Bear.

However, Urlacher never won a Super Bowl, and Dan has stated frequently on the show that titles are the only thing that matter. By that definition, wouldn’t the two players have had the exact same amount of success?

We measure success by banners and parades in this town. Big boy football, not wine & cheese football.


Although full of holes, this is a great Who You Crappin. You can pretty much send that in as is and I wish you would

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Urlacher isn't in the same league as Butkus. Butkus is one of the best five defensive players in the history of the game. dan is ridiculous.


I don't think Butkus is one of the five best linebackers in the history of the game.

Dan is still a penus.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
It wasn't that the Butka teams never won anything. It's that his teams were monumentally bad and rarely even competitive. Urlacher's teams were at least in contention for most of his career.

Sadly, not WYC material.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 4:56 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
I don't think Butkus is one of the five best linebackers in the history of the game.


He was hands down the best and Lewis is the only guy even close.*





*I wouldn't call Lawrence Taylor a linebacker. He was his own thing.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 2270
Location: Wheaton, IL
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Lebron James is better than both of them put together!

_________________
Host of the weekly "We Fish ASA" podcast
Weekly columnist for the Northwest Herald
Bi-monthly columnist for Illinois Outdoor News magazine
Former host of The Outdoors Experience on WIND and The Great Outdoors on CLTV
http://www.wefishasa.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Brian Urlacher > Chris Zorich > Dick Butkus

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:05 pm
Posts: 1729
I don't listen to Screamy & Punny in the am much, but I turned it on this morning to hear Screamy befuddidly echo the statement "Urlacher is better than Butkus?" quickly followed by a "well that's just not true". He then went on to discuss some great Buffone-told stories about Butkus.

I can't form an opinion as I literally never saw Butka play one snap, but clearly that doesn't matter to Dan as his stupid radio narrative has deemed Butkus some knuckle-dragging idiot who has a great reputation mostly because of physical plays he'd make that AREN'T EVEN ALLOWED ANYMOAR!!!11!!!!!1!!!!

Screw Dan and his stupid absolutes. Of course lap dog Terry is going to nod along, agree, and supposedly give some credit to Dan's argument because he "did" see Butkus play......but Terry's opinion is about as valuable as a steak dinner when trying to land a big free agent. #boom


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Wasn't the thing that was always said about Butkus was that he played his last couple of years on one leg?

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
just watch the highlight reels. he was a man among boys a la Jim Brown.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Urlacher was certainly the faster player of the two. But it's sort of unusual to compare the two since they didn't really play in the same era, the same defensive scheme and they didn't serve the same purpose. Butkus didn't have the advances in weight training or medicine that the players have now. Urlacher was able to chase people down and interfere with opposing quarterbacks' ability to throw the ball. While Butkus was a menacing presence in the middle of the field who destroyed opposing players. Urlacher had the speed of a safety in a linebacker's body. I think the other team feared Butkus. The other problem is you can't compare stats since they didn't keep the same stats between when Urlacher played and when Butkus played.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
Wasn't Butkus a RB at the height of the quality of CPS football. Wasn't he also around 250 pounds.

Not slow. Was athletic. Would have certainly been big enough.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
He was the same size as Urlacher, only everyone else on the field was smaller. Linemen were like 250 or less??

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Id like to see Ray Lewis play a Soda Jerk on My Two Dads as well as Butka.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
rogers park bryan wrote:
Id like to see Ray Lewis play a Soda Jerk on My Two Dads as well as Butka.

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
I do think Butkus is the standard by which all LBs are judged and rightfully so. He was an all time great. But can someone explain to me what exactly Butkus could do on a football field that Urlacher could not? In my mind they are 1a. and 1b. in Bear History.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
But can someone explain to me what exactly Butkus could do on a football field that Urlacher could not?
I can only go on videos, but Butkus seemed better at delivering big hits and breaking through the line.

The one flaw in Urlacher's game has always been he needed game changing defensive lineman to meet his potential. Some of his "bad" seasons were because of changes up front. I believe the first example of this was after they lost Ted Washington.

Now, I'm sure the offensive lineman weren't as good when Butkus was playing either.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:09 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Now, I'm sure the offensive lineman weren't as good when Butkus was playing either.


I don't think that's true. They just had different qualities. Big fat guys like Ted Washington couldn't cut it as a lead blocker on a sweep, but they're perfect for getting in the way of pass rushers. The game is different but there are guys who could play in any era, like Randall McDaniel and Anthony Munoz and Art Shell and Forrest Gregg.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
But can someone explain to me what exactly Butkus could do on a football field that Urlacher could not?
I can only go on videos, but Butkus seemed better at delivering big hits and breaking through the line.

The one flaw in Urlacher's game has always been he needed game changing defensive lineman to meet his potential. Some of his "bad" seasons were because of changes up front. I believe the first example of this was after they lost Ted Washington.

Now, I'm sure the offensive lineman weren't as good when Butkus was playing either.


Yeah those are good points.

I just think that people seem to go to one of two areas in this discussion.

Urlacher was a freak athletically and Butkus(and players of his era) couldn't hang with him.

or

Butkus was an all time great and Urlacher couldn't hang with him.

I think both are equally wrong. I think the separation between them is extremely small.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Right there is a small difference. Also, I don't really buy into the freak athlete thing for any comparison like this. Back in those days the guys had to play and had jobs in the off season as well as less nutritional knowledge etc. If you don't think that if Butkus went to college in the 90's and played in the 2000's that he would look like Urlacher or Lewis you are sorely mistaken.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:21 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
RFDC wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
But can someone explain to me what exactly Butkus could do on a football field that Urlacher could not?
I can only go on videos, but Butkus seemed better at delivering big hits and breaking through the line.

The one flaw in Urlacher's game has always been he needed game changing defensive lineman to meet his potential. Some of his "bad" seasons were because of changes up front. I believe the first example of this was after they lost Ted Washington.

Now, I'm sure the offensive lineman weren't as good when Butkus was playing either.


Yeah those are good points.

I just think that people seem to go to one of two areas in this discussion.

Urlacher was a freak athletically and Butkus(and players of his era) couldn't hang with him.

or

Butkus was an all time great and Urlacher couldn't hang with him.

I think both are equally wrong. I think the separation between them is extremely small.



I wouldn't say Urlacher "couldn't hang" with Butkus. Urlacher was a great player, but Butkus is at the very top level. I'd put Ray Lewis right there. They're both better than Urlacher. That isn't really a knock on Urlacher. There are only a handful of guys who had the kind of impact on the game that guys like Butkus, Lewis, Lawrence Taylor did.

Roberto Clemente was a great player but he shouldn't be compared to Willie Mays or Mickey Mantle. Doug Wilson and Chris Pronger were great players but they shouldn't be compared to Bobby Orr. Butkus is Willie Mays or Bobby Orr.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
But can someone explain to me what exactly Butkus could do on a football field that Urlacher could not?
I can only go on videos, but Butkus seemed better at delivering big hits and breaking through the line.

The one flaw in Urlacher's game has always been he needed game changing defensive lineman to meet his potential. Some of his "bad" seasons were because of changes up front. I believe the first example of this was after they lost Ted Washington.

Now, I'm sure the offensive lineman weren't as good when Butkus was playing either.


Yeah those are good points.

I just think that people seem to go to one of two areas in this discussion.

Urlacher was a freak athletically and Butkus(and players of his era) couldn't hang with him.

or

Butkus was an all time great and Urlacher couldn't hang with him.

I think both are equally wrong. I think the separation between them is extremely small.



I wouldn't say Urlacher "couldn't hang" with Butkus. Urlacher was a great player, but Butkus is at the very top level. I'd put Ray Lewis right there. They're both better than Urlacher. That isn't really a knock on Urlacher. There are only a handful of guys who had the kind of impact on the game that guys like Butkus, Lewis, Lawrence Taylor did.

Roberto Clemente was a great player but he shouldn't be compared to Willie Mays or Mickey Mantle. Doug Wilson and Chris Pronger were great players but they shouldn't be compared to Bobby Orr. Butkus is Willie Mays or Bobby Orr.


I agree with all of that. Urlacher is at the top of that next tier right after Butkus and Lewis.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 11:42 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Doug WIlson shouldn't even be compared to Chris Pronger.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 11:47 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
Doug WIlson shouldn't even be compared to Chris Pronger.


Okay, we can assign various levels to all players. You know hockey better than I do, but Wilson was one of the better defensemen of his era, particularly from an offensive standpoint. Regardless, you get the point I was trying to make.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 1:14 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
pittmike wrote:
Right there is a small difference. Also, I don't really buy into the freak athlete thing for any comparison like this. Back in those days the guys had to play and had jobs in the off season as well as less nutritional knowledge etc. If you don't think that if Butkus went to college in the 90's and played in the 2000's that he would look like Urlacher or Lewis you are sorely mistaken.


Also, obviously the game has become much more centered on passing. This has caused offensive linemen to become bigger and stronger, but also slower. It has also allowed a place in the game for big fat interior linemen on defense, guys like Ted Washington and Keith Traylor who are there to push the pocket back against the big, fat offenive linemen. And shitty quarterbacks like Jim Miller put up more numbers than some Hall of Famers from past eras. Guys like Newton, Wilson, and RGIII might possibly cause the defensive linemen to become smaller and more athletic.

Butkus was a freakish guy in his time. He was as big, strong, and fast as anyone playing today. Let's not go all the way back to him anyway. Look at guys like Jay Hilgenberg and Jimbo Covert. They're pitifully undersized for today's game. But is anyone really going to say they weren't great? If they couldn't play today it isn't because today's replacements are "better", but rather because the game is played differently and different skills and attributes are valued.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group