It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:35 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
conns7901 wrote:
Youth Sports should be about participation. High School sports should also be about participation until Varsity.

Our goal on lower levels is to play as many kids as reasonably possible. Winning is second.

If this kid was faster he would of been running. However, you do not see many Freshman running varsity unless the team is not very good or they are just filling in an event.


What do you consider lower levels? If you are talking about Park District/House leagues, then I agree. But when you get into travel leagues, it changes a lot. Kids no longer are given equal playing time and sometimes might not play much at all in some games. But travelling team level play is only for the better players and they want to compete against the better competition.

I am not sure that I entirely agree with your last point. Some coaches try to reward Seniors for their past years of dedication and give them their opportunity to shine over a freshman or sophmore who will have plenty of opportunity in the future. Not always the case, but sometimes. He may have been faster and never given the chance to run those sprints. Then again, he may have run them in practice and been found to be slower than those chosen to run them. Need more info.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 12:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19378
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

What do you consider lower levels?

Freshman and Sophomores

Elmhurst Steve wrote:
But travelling team level play is only for the better players and they want to compete against the better competition.


Maybe 20 years ago. The majority of travels teams are not very good.


Elmhurst Steve wrote:
I am not sure that I entirely agree with your last point. Some coaches try to reward Seniors for their past years of dedication and give them their opportunity to shine over a freshman or sophmore who will have plenty of opportunity in the future. Not always the case, but sometimes. He may have been faster and never given the chance to run those sprints. Then again, he may have run them in practice and been found to be slower than those chosen to run them. Need more info.


If the kid was worth the 40 million his dad is suing for my guess is he would be running.

I also took a quick glance at Dyestat. They have a couple of kids who are decent middle distance types and their sprinters are average at best. Bad 4x1 times and decent 4x2 times. Which tells me the kid is not that fast and was probably at best close to the upper clansmen. I'm sure dad and work ethic didn't help things.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I just wonder what times this kid had in the 200, 400 etc.. the previous year in 8th grade races and compare those times with the times the Seniors chosen to run instead wound up with.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group