SomeGuy wrote:
Chus wrote:
I could say the same thing regarding you, and your need to respond to me, on matters such as this. I have heard your complaint, and it's obvious that I don't care what you think. Feel free to ignore me, if you don't like what I have to say.
No, not really. It is obvious that you care what I think, you keep responding. It's also obvious that your goal now is to antagonize Chas and that's fine, you're a troll, not a general troll but a Chas Troll. Or Chas is the troll and he's driven you to the brink, therefore he has won. Or maybe he isn't even a real person and you've been had.
I respond to many people whose opinions matter not to me. This is a message board. People respond to one another. I have heard you voice this same complaint many times. The fact that I continue to do as I feel, while ignoring your sage advice, is proof that I in fact, don't give a flying fuck about what you think about me, or my posts. It's pretty clear that you don't think much of me, and that's just fine with me. Somehow, my life, and my message board existence will go on.
Of course, I troll Chas. Stevie Wonder can see that. I guess you are the only one who is unsure as to whom is doing the trolling. It certainly isn't the guy who goes crying to the moderator for protection.
Why are you his white knight? He has an IQ in the 120's. He should be able to handle himself, especially against someone like me who can't understand your brilliance, right?
Chus wrote:
As far as I know, he doesn't have terminal cancer, so your previous analogy is ridiculous.
SomeGuy wrote:
It isn't a ridiculous analogy, what is out of this world is your inability to understand my simple point. Your hate for Chas and his condition is blinding you. Have fun on your crusade, a crusade that is turning out to be as successful as the Children's Crusade.
I understood what you said, it just didn't make much sense. Somebody who is suffering from terminal cancer is not the same thing as somebody who is on "Disability, baby!". Nobody knows exactly what his condition is. He won't answer the questions asked by myself, Seacrest, Darkside, and others. If it is that cut and dry, then it shouldn't be that difficult to explain. It was pretty easy for me to explain the reasons why my mother-in-law needs disability. Her case should be an absolute slam dunk, but we have to jump through hoops every year. So, I will not apologize for hammering somebody who I feel is cheating the system.
Your crusade is defending his great honor, from my vicious, and unwarranted attacks. Good luck with that.