It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 12:58 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Powerhouse233 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Shaq not a top ten player?

I don't have him in my top 10. Probably right outside of it, 11-15 range. He easily coulda been top 3 if he wanted it. He didn't.


Shaq is a top 10 player all time


I don't know where he ranks within the top 10 or 15, but I agree with FF about him being top 3 if he wanted it. Like I said earlier, Kobe was right about him being fat and lazy. He still got four rings despite himself, so I wonder what would have happened had he been slightly more professional.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Sounds like Bernsie needs to get started on one of these:

Image

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
badrogue17 wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Shaq not a top ten player?

Grant Hill better than Bird too


I don't know about him being better than Bird, but his first six years in the league were pretty good for someone so young and green. Check out his stats when he was the Pistons. They average out to something like 23 7 and 7, and this is all before age 28.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Powerhouse233 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Shaq not a top ten player?

I don't have him in my top 10. Probably right outside of it, 11-15 range. He easily coulda been top 3 if he wanted it. He didn't.


Shaq is a top 10 player all time

Yeah, that's called an opinion. I got one too, which is that he isn't top 10 all time. Love your suit Powerhouse, but disagree with you here.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Shaq not a top ten player?

I don't have him in my top 10. Probably right outside of it, 11-15 range. He easily coulda been top 3 if he wanted it. He didn't.


Shaq is a top 10 player all time

Yeah, that's called an opinion. I got one too, which is that he isn't top 10 all time. Love your suit Powerhouse, but disagree with you here.


That's fine, but from my standpoint his combination of dominance and team success puts him in that category. To be fair you also have to consider his somewhat sub-par defense and his consistently poor conditioning which may have contributed to him missing 10-15 games a lot of seasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
veganfan21 wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Shaq not a top ten player?

Grant Hill better than Bird too


I don't know about him being better than Bird, but his first six years in the league were pretty good for someone so young and green. Check out his stats when he was the Pistons. They average out to something like 23 7 and 7, and this is all before age 28.


He was incredible but I don't think he was as good as Bird. I don't think B&B really credit Bird for his astounding all around play. He's probably still the best passing forward of all time and he was also a great rebounder. If Grant Hill never got injured I think he could have been one of the 15-20 best players ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19372
I don't get how you can easily dismiss Shaq or Bird being top ten but saying Grant Hill would of been if had not gotten hurt. They may not be but are in argument.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Powerhouse233 wrote:
That's fine, but from my standpoint his combination of dominance and team success puts him in that category. To be fair you also have to consider his somewhat sub-par defense and his consistently poor conditioning which may have contributed to him missing 10-15 games a lot of seasons.

That's the rub. He was so dominant and so damn good, that I can even excuse the fact that you couldn't rely on him in the last two minutes of a close game. But all his other faults are too great for me to elevate him into the top 10. He also was an underachieving rebounder in the regular season. He could have put up 1960's rebounding numbers per game if he was motivated. If Ben Wallace could grab 15 a game, Shaq coulda gotten 20 if he wanted. Simmons or someone else once said about him that he was just motivated enough to win titles, be looked at as an all time great, be famous, and live the life. Which is fine. He still had a career that was better than all but maybe a dozen guys who ever lived. But I do think if he had Jordan's competitiveness he could be looked at as 1a and 1b with Jordan as GOAT.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
conns7901 wrote:
I don't get how you can easily dismiss Shaq or Bird being top ten but saying Grant Hill would of been if had not gotten hurt. They may not be but are in argument.

I must have missed something. Who doesn't have Bird in their top 10? He's easily in my top 5.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19372
FavreFan wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
I don't get how you can easily dismiss Shaq or Bird being top ten but saying Grant Hill would of been if had not gotten hurt. They may not be but are in argument.

I must have missed something. Who doesn't have Bird in their top 10? He's easily in my top 5.



Danny commented on how Maddux boy didn't have Bird in his top ten so atleast he got that right.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
conns7901 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
I don't get how you can easily dismiss Shaq or Bird being top ten but saying Grant Hill would of been if had not gotten hurt. They may not be but are in argument.

I must have missed something. Who doesn't have Bird in their top 10? He's easily in my top 5.



Danny commented on how Maddux boy didn't have Bird in his top ten so atleast he got that right.


I turned off the radio in the middle of his comment but did he have David Robinson and Karl Malone in his top 10?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
The game was good because Lebron played in it :shock: The game was over at halftime. Grant hill better than Bird ? What the fuck is wrong with you?

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Powerhouse233 wrote:

He was incredible but I don't think he was as good as Bird. I don't think B&B really credit Bird for his astounding all around play. He's probably still the best passing forward of all time and he was also a great rebounder. If Grant Hill never got injured I think he could have been one of the 15-20 best players ever.


Sure, I agree. Based on the output of his initial years, he could have easily averaged LeBron-esque numbers in points, boards, and assists. Not saying he would have been as good or better than James, but the numbers would have been there.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:02 am
Posts: 1777
Location: Who wants to know?
Powerhouse233 wrote:
He was incredible but I don't think he was as good as Bird. I don't think B&B really credit Bird for his astounding all around play. He's probably still the best passing forward of all time and he was also a great rebounder.


This is my feeling, and Bird had that competitive drive to cut your heart out, that I've only seen in Jordan and Kobe. That can't be ignored. There are such things as intangibles. B&B like to bash Bird to troll the old, white, "racist"(their word, not mine) caller.

_________________
I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out. - Bill Hicks

Let's do it for Johnny!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:02 am
Posts: 1777
Location: Who wants to know?
FavreFan wrote:
That's the rub. He was so dominant and so damn good, that I can even excuse the fact that you couldn't rely on him in the last two minutes of a close game. But all his other faults are too great for me to elevate him into the top 10. He also was an underachieving rebounder in the regular season. He could have put up 1960's rebounding numbers per game if he was motivated. If Ben Wallace could grab 15 a game, Shaq coulda gotten 20 if he wanted. Simmons or someone else once said about him that he was just motivated enough to win titles, be looked at as an all time great, be famous, and live the life. Which is fine. He still had a career that was better than all but maybe a dozen guys who ever lived. But I do think if he had Jordan's competitiveness he could be looked at as 1a and 1b with Jordan as GOAT.


Well written. I totally agree. And this Grant Hill is better than Bird chatter is ricockulous!

_________________
I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out. - Bill Hicks

Let's do it for Johnny!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
NBA Hell= Having a team without Durant or LeBron

Spurs are gonna be the first NBA Hell team to win a title. That's pretty cool.

I only got as far as the first page and started laughing. Am I the only one here who thinks a healthy Rose is worth more than 4 wins?

Cof, wanna rerun our division bet again next season? Instead of avatar lets make it like $50 or $100. This offer is open to anyone else too, btw.
yes, I would. I don't trust the Bulls to put together a good bench. I do trust Luol Deng to be due for a hobbling injury. I do trust Noah to have foot problems. I do trust Boozer to finally be injured for long stretches again as he has been off and on in his career. So yes, I'll do that, even while acknowledging the greatness of Derrick Rose.

$50? Large bets make large enemies. Besides, I just got done shelling out 6K for medical stuff in the fam.

And I just don't see the Spurs doing it. I'll be happily wrong. I see the Heat defending them well.

I wouldn't think $50 would be a huge amount for a Cubs season ticket holder, but I understand having a lot of bills for medical stuff. Avatar bet is fine. Anyone else on the board want to put actual money on the Pacers vs Bulls next season?


As for all this ridiculous NBA Hell/Bulls/Heat/LBJ/Durant talk - IF the Spurs beat the Heat in 5 or 6 games this year and it's not particularly competitive, will you guys finally start changing your mind about what it takes to win it all? Ill hang up and listen for my answer.

I think you misunderstood me. I'll take the $50 bet, not the $100 bet. Plus an avatar bet. And the Cubs season tickets are partly why I'm poor.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
I might put Grant Hill in the top 10 most over rated players

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I might put Grant Hill in the top 10 most over rated players


On what basis? And during what time-frame was he overrated?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
That's fine, but from my standpoint his combination of dominance and team success puts him in that category. To be fair you also have to consider his somewhat sub-par defense and his consistently poor conditioning which may have contributed to him missing 10-15 games a lot of seasons.

That's the rub. He was so dominant and so damn good, that I can even excuse the fact that you couldn't rely on him in the last two minutes of a close game. But all his other faults are too great for me to elevate him into the top 10. He also was an underachieving rebounder in the regular season. He could have put up 1960's rebounding numbers per game if he was motivated. If Ben Wallace could grab 15 a game, Shaq coulda gotten 20 if he wanted. Simmons or someone else once said about him that he was just motivated enough to win titles, be looked at as an all time great, be famous, and live the life. Which is fine. He still had a career that was better than all but maybe a dozen guys who ever lived. But I do think if he had Jordan's competitiveness he could be looked at as 1a and 1b with Jordan as GOAT.


The vast majority of the time he had his teams so far in front he wasn't needed in the last two minutes.

Nobody had Jordan's competitiveness. That's why he's Jordan.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:50 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:02 am
Posts: 1777
Location: Who wants to know?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody had Jordan's competitiveness. That's why he's Jordan.


Yep! Bernsie put it best. His competitiveness was pathological. That's why I'll take Jordan over Lebron 6 days a week, and twice on Sunday's and Game 7's.

_________________
I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out. - Bill Hicks

Let's do it for Johnny!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
veganfan21 wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I might put Grant Hill in the top 10 most over rated players


On what basis? And during what time-frame was he overrated?[/quote

19 years 6 time all star hurt way too much had a good 5 year span. From 2000 until 2013 what the fuck did he do????

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:57 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:02 am
Posts: 1777
Location: Who wants to know?
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I might put Grant Hill in the top 10 most over rated players


+1

You're not great on potential. Yeah he was injured, but that's life. Penny Hardaway was pretty damn good for a bit too.

_________________
I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out. - Bill Hicks

Let's do it for Johnny!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Dallas Winston wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody had Jordan's competitiveness. That's why he's Jordan.


Yep! Bernsie put it best. His competitiveness was pathological. That's why I'll take Jordan over Lebron 6 days a week, and twice on Sunday's and Game 7's.


Exactly.

And I should correct myself. There are other guys as competitive as Jordan, but never was a guy anywhere close to as skilled as Jordan so competitive. It's hard. They don't have to be. So they aren't. They can show up and be good. Why work hard or try to kill the other guy? I know I wouldn't. Scott Skiles is as competitive as Jordan. If he weren't, he wouldn't have played a single NBA game.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Dallas Winston wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I might put Grant Hill in the top 10 most over rated players


+1

You're not great on potential. Yeah he was injured, but that's life. Penny Hardaway was pretty damn good for a bit too.



Exactly..just. cause Boers likes him...as a college player and pro when did this fuck know anything?

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG

Bird
Career 897 870 38.4 .496 .376 .886 2.00 8.00 10.00 6.3 1.73 .84 3.14 2.50 24.3

Hill
Career 1,026 972 33.9 .483 .314 .769 1.1 4.9 6.0 4.1 1.2 .6 2.40 2.32 16.7

I am not a Bird guy but he has it seems to me. Also, laughed when Bernsie was ready to remove the Admiral for Hill.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Dallas Winston wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I might put Grant Hill in the top 10 most over rated players


+1

You're not great on potential. Yeah he was injured, but that's life. Penny Hardaway was pretty damn good for a bit too.



Exactly..just. cause Boers likes him...as a college player and pro when did this fuck know anything?



Terry used to suck Hill's dick big time early in his career. You can always tell right away when Terry has his heart on a young kid. He says he is "terrific". Corey Patterson was another can't miss.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Forgot Penny Hardaway too. Terry loves when he is on the ground floor of a terrific player and really get that not well know nickname out there.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
KS, thank you for laying all that out.

Your newest Bull for next year will be Randy Foye. That would be such a GarPax move.

SIGH

You're probably right.

I hate Paxson as a gm. If he didnt luck into Rose he'd be worse than his brother.

Not sure if serious....

Hyperbole but I think you overrate John Paxson

And City, how are his hands tied financially in a salary cap league?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I can't figure that out either. It is a salary cap league and aside from the luxury taxers you can't get new good people. I watch trades all over the damn place. Not that I would want him but the Lakers were able to trade from cap hell for Howard?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Paxson was well on his way to ruining this team before May 2008.

Not even close. Gordon is one of the only players he has overdrafted. Deng has turned out to be a solid pick. Noah has turned out to be a really good pick(most people wanted Spencer Hawes). Kirk was ok enough his first go-around here.

A good case can be made that Paxson is the 2nd best drafting GM in the NBA right now, behind Sam Presti. His only weakness is not being aggressive enough on the trade front, but one bad blockbuster trade could easily undo all the work he's done the past six years. By being conservative and not selling the farm for KG or Kobe, he has built a team right now that should win 55-60 games a year for the forseeable future, and will most definitely not be in NBA Hell. He also hired who is now the 2nd best coach in the league(also hired Vinny but credit to him for firing Vinny even after making the playoffs two years in a row and then bringing in Thibs)

Tyrus Thomas wasn't over drafted?
Ben Wallace signing?
Hiring Vinny?

All terrible


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group